Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add back parser support of label #243

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

fuyufjh
Copy link
Contributor

@fuyufjh fuyufjh commented Jan 2, 2025

Bring back the parser support for <label> of query tests.

Note that the label doesn't function as expected. This PR only supports it in parser so that a valid .slt file won't panic

See more background in #242.

@xxchan
Copy link
Member

xxchan commented Jan 2, 2025

cc @Omega359 May you try whether it works for you?

@Omega359
Copy link
Contributor

Omega359 commented Jan 2, 2025

cc @Omega359 May you try whether it works for you?

I will try this out hopefully today or tomorrow - thanks for the ping!

@Omega359
Copy link
Contributor

Omega359 commented Jan 5, 2025

I tested this with DataFusion pointing to the branch source for this PR and it seems to work as expected. Thanks!

@fuyufjh
Copy link
Contributor Author

fuyufjh commented Jan 6, 2025

cc. @xxchan shall we merge this and release a new verison (along with #244)

Signed-off-by: Eric Fu <fuyufjh@gmail.com>
@fuyufjh fuyufjh force-pushed the eric/support_label_in_parser branch from 64bd3ed to f7c2eee Compare January 6, 2025 05:47
Signed-off-by: xxchan <xxchan22f@gmail.com>
@xxchan xxchan enabled auto-merge (squash) January 6, 2025 06:13
@xxchan xxchan disabled auto-merge January 6, 2025 06:13
@xxchan xxchan enabled auto-merge (squash) January 6, 2025 06:14
@xxchan xxchan merged commit 7b86552 into risinglightdb:main Jan 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@xxchan
Copy link
Member

xxchan commented Jan 6, 2025

0.26.0 published

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants