enhancement: improve python code quality by passing it through automated tools #330
Comments
|
Hello! How do i contribute to this? I have tried forking the repo and feeding it against deepsource. I see a lot of suggested fixes. How do i go forward now? Thank you! |
|
@SumirSeth thanks for tackling this! Yes, I have seen the same with No need to fix them yet: let's just iterate the checks through the different tools (in separate repos, to do the comparison). I propose to review them together, if would like to do that or, find some other procedure which is mutually convenient. If you could share the URLs to review together here in this issue, that would be the next step. |
|
@SumirSeth : would you like to select a couple of potential PRs from deepsource? do you see any unavoidable changes? |
sorry, been extremely busy with uni. will look into it. |
QA: The code of qtop has already been through
ruff(in a configuration which is now part of the git tree), however there are more things to check and aspects of the code waiting to be improved, without necessarily changing its functionality.A project of its own is to try the qtop repository against different online tools and see what they report and how (and how easy are the fixes involved). At least of these should be adopted for a day-to-day usage.
The way to go about it is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: