-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stubtest: fix signature construction for overload + implicit classmethod #9921
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
stubtest: fix signature construction for overload + implicit classmethod
__class_getitem__ and __init_subclass__ are always classmethods, even if they aren't decorated. We previously only handled this correctly if these methods weren't overloaded. This came up in python/typeshed#4937
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if I name it
_cls
instead? It sounds like we should just unconditionally remove the first arg.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unconditionally removing the first argument here isn't right, because it'll do the wrong thing if you do choose to decorate with
@classmethod
, since those get their first argument stripped when resolving the decorator.I don't think this is important enough to figure out how to chain enough state to keep track of that.
Especially since stubtest currently is picky about classmethod names being cls, e.g. this not-actually-needed-potentially-problematic assert when resolving the classmethod decorator:
mypy/mypy/stubtest.py
Line 815 in 92923b2