Is your feature request related to a problem?

I would like to implement reflexive operator on a custom class applied to xarray objects.

Following is a demo snippet:

import numpy as np
import xarray as xr


class DemoObj:
    def __add__(self, other):
        print(f'__add__ call: type={other.__class__}, value={other}')
        return other

    def __radd__(self, other):
        print(f'__radd__ call: type={other.__class__}, value={other}')
        return other


obj = DemoObj()
da = xr.DataArray(np.arange(8))

print('#### Test __add__ ####')
obj + da
print('\n')

print('#### Test __radd__ ####')
da + obj

Actual Output:

#### Test __add__ ####
__add__ call: type=<class 'xarray.core.dataarray.DataArray'>, value=<xarray.DataArray (dim_0: 8)>
array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7])
Dimensions without coordinates: dim_0

#### Test __radd__ ####
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=0
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=1
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=2
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=3
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=4
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=5
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=6
__radd__ call: type=<class 'int'>, value=7

We can see __add__ got called once and received xr.DataArray obj but __radd__ got called 8 times and received ints. This causes 2 problems;

• Performance issue on large xr.DataArray
• No access to xr.DataArray coords which is needed in a more realistic use case

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to have a mechanism so that DemoObj.__radd__ got called only once and received xr.DataArray instance in the above example.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Option 1:

The most naive approach to workaround this is to call obj.__radd__(da) to achieve da + obj which defeats the purpose of implementing the reflexive operator and not offer good readability.

Option 2:

As xr.DataArray._binary_op replies on numpy's operator resolving mechanism under the hood, I could improve the situation by setting __array_ufunc__ = None on my class, e.g.:

class DemoObj:
    __array_ufunc__ = None

    def __add__(self, other):
        ...

    def __radd__(self, other):
        ...

This will make __radd__ get called once with np.ndarray instead of 8 times with ints. This solves the potential perf concern, however, it still doesn't cover the case if xr.Dataarray.coords is needed.

Additional context

Considering xr.DataArray._binary_op has already returned NoImplemented for a list of classes:
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/v2025.01.1/xarray/core/dataarray.py#L4808-L4809

I'm wondering whether we should do the same for classes has __array_ufunc__ = None, i.e.:

def _binary_op(
    self: T_DataArray,
    other: Any,
    f: Callable,
    reflexive: bool = False,
) -> T_DataArray:
    if hasattr(other, '__array_ufunc__') and other.__array_ufunc__ is None:
        return NotImplementd
    ...

I'm happy with a similar property if you prefer to make it xarray specific. I'm happy to make the PR as well once you confirmed the mechanism / property name you preferred.

Many thanks in advance!