Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: All release platforms should have weekly builds & tests #711

Open
1 of 15 tasks
cipherboy opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 15 tasks

CI: All release platforms should have weekly builds & tests #711

cipherboy opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@cipherboy
Copy link
Member

cipherboy commented Nov 14, 2024

As seen in #700 and #710, we need CI to verify all release platforms at least weekly and ideally be triggerable on demand prior to release. Tests using Docker need not pass (though, ideally, an external Docker host should be provided on platforms which don't have native Docker support), but the binaries should be buildable on these platforms.

  • Linux
    • amd64 (native GitHub Actions)
    • arm64 (native GitHub Actions)
    • riscv
    • s390x (OSU OSL)
    • ppc64 (OSU OSL)
  • Windows
    • amd64 (has GH Actions)
  • MacOS
    • amd64 (has GH Actions)
    • arm64 (has GH Actions)
  • OpenBSD
  • FreeBSD
  • NetBSD
  • Illumos

As seen with Solaris, if a platform lacks support for OpenBao and its dependencies, it may be dropped from certain releases.

The following platforms and architectures are proposed for mandatory release support:

  • Linux/amd64
  • Windows/amd64
  • MacOS/amd64, MacOS/arm64

Pending support in our CI pipelines, the following will be added to mandatory release support:

  • Linux/arm64

If anyone would like to volunteer to bring a CI platform, please comment here or otherwise reach out!

@cipherboy cipherboy added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 14, 2024
@cipherboy
Copy link
Member Author

@DanGhita @JanMa nodejs/build#2876 will be interesting for v2.2.0 assuming #739 is finished. I think what will need to happen is we build the UI once in an earlier stage and then depend on it from cache for all other arches.

@cipherboy
Copy link
Member Author

@JanMa @DanGhita Hmm, perhaps problematic, but if we continue to use the matrix form, we'll be limited by https://github.com/gotestyourself/gotestsum/releases , which doesn't support Windows for one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant