Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
english/fragments: init
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
milahu committed Apr 11, 2021
1 parent ab64f28 commit e0a7fd5
Showing 14 changed files with 547 additions and 0 deletions.
Binary file not shown.
26 changes: 26 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/archetypes.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
warrior lover magician king ==
fire earth air water ==
Ntuiting sensing feeling thinking == 1234.

all the same thing, just different words.
element is inborn and stable for life.
we can only change our subtype (version, modality)
see my #alchi project @ https://milahu.github.io/alchi/english/alchi-tables.html -
also, obligatory warrior sound: Chase & Status - Fire in your eyes @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWeieT3jnrg

How to Date Hot Girls when you're not a "Cool Kid"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwoDbVgKm0c

via The-Four-Layers-of-Strength.pdf by Elliott Hulse



"balance your strongest archetype with the others" ....
let me say: you are confused, but you have the right spirit.
what this "balancing" means exactly (imho), is
having balanced relationships to all of our six natural friends:
three have opposite element/archetype, one has the same element,
and the two others have the two remaining types.
at least that is my prediction, which i have visualized here
https://milahu.github.io/alchi/src/alchi-maps/dist/alchi-maps.2020-09-02.html

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
Another intricacy that emerged from the study
of the dark side of interpersonal communication
involves arguing and fighting.

By and large, arguments between friends or spouses
are generally thought of as a negative event.

However, research in this field shed light
on the age-old adage that “it’s not what you argue about, it’s how you argue.”

Research further yielded that couples, both romantic and platonic,
who argue with a purpose and do not devolve into fights filled with ad hominin attacks,
actually better manage their relationships.

Moreover, an argument will often involve forgiveness and reconciliation,
which may ultimately strengthen the relationship.

While “fighting” in relationships is negative, research continues to show
that “arguing,” when done properly, is a positive force.

Scholars continue to examine these “gray areas” in interpersonal communication,
which have relevance in the improvement of social bonds at both the personal and the greater societal levels.

https://www.mastersincommunications.com/research/interpersonal-communication/

45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/differences to other systems.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
differences to other systems
deviations from other systems

cherry picking

corrections

liberal interpretation
loose translation



traditional alchemy:
fire + air = masculine
earth + water = feminine

we change this to
fire + water = masculine
earth + air = feminine
and
fire + air = young
earth + water = old

cos fire and water have long bottom (and longer penis), which is more masculine.
cos earth and air have broad bottom ("child-bearing hips"), which is more feminine.

cos fire and air have broad top (and short hair), which is more childish.
cos earth and water have long top (and long hair), which is more mature.




the eigencolors of fire and air have two variants:
a. fire red + air yellow
b. fire yellow + air red

here we choose variant a (fire red + air yellow),
cos fire is opposite of earth (green) and red is opposite of green.
cos air is opposite of water (blue) and yellow is opposite of blue.
see the tenscross, or the four color system color wheel.
opposite colors do not mix.
depending on the color system (additive or subtractive), they mix to black or white.



31 changes: 31 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/early education.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
early education

movies:

No Small Matter (2020)

The Raising of America
Documentary on the science of early childhood, working parents and public policy
https://raisingofamerica.org/order-now

demain

(alphabet - freiheit oder angst)

Starting at Zero: Reimagining Education in America
via https://www.alabamaschoolreadiness.org/invest-early-alabama-film-festival/

Through The Night



The Hundred Languages of Children

https://www.bbc.co.uk/teach/early-years-teaching-resources/zhhf92p

Strategies For Children
https://www.youtube.com/user/StrategiesChildren

https://player.fm/podcasts/Early-Childhood


Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
fake victim
hypocrite
playing the victim
greed
passive aggression
passive violence



The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you

It's an antisemitic proverb that's basically saying that when Jews complain, the complaining is invalid because it's really the nonJews (goyim, goy) who are suffering.

The Jewish Bolsheviks (93% of all soviet commissars were Jewish, including Stalin, Lenin, and Trotsky) murdered 66 million Russians and it was a saying that Russian peasants used to say when complaining about the Jewish commissars calling them 'anti-semites' and 'racists' (the Jews invented this word) while murdering entire villages. This term entered the English vernacular through the stories of refugees from the Bolshevik 'Red terror'.

The origin of the term, however, has it's roots in 16th century Poland. The Jews were notorious as loan-sharks who used usury to enslave the polish peasantry through debt and they would use some of the most vile and cruel methods when collecting these debts, and would always complain that they were in fact the victims, even after employing murder, rape, and robbery to collect what they mistakenly believed they were owed. Hence the saying 'the Jew cries out in pain as he stikes you'.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
[Asbestos](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos#Discovery_of_toxicity), [Thalidomide](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide#Birth_defect_crisis), [Amalgam](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalgam_(dentistry)#History_of_use), [Alcohol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States), [Heroin](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heroin#History), [Cocaine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocaine#Medicalization), [Amphetamine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphetamine#History,_society,_and_culture), [PCB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polychlorinated_biphenyl#History), lead, formaldehyde, pesticides ([DDT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT#United_States_ban), Glyphosate), human feces (in drinking water causing typhoid and cholera in Rome and London), industrial waste (leather-tanning waste, butchering waste) ...

these materials all were considered "safe", and you were called "crazy" when you tried to warn people, before the actual damages grew too large to cover them up, so today we have a "scientific consent" that these materials are harmful

for "secretly harmful" materials like electromagnetic radiation, the "proof of harm" is much harder to show

and the idiots will always "if it was harmful, it would be prohibited by our benevolent dictators"

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoNewNormal/comments/mk94a8/trust_the_science/

http://www.pollutionissues.com/Fo-Hi/History.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_waste

https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/fracking-risk-compared-to-thalidomide-and-asbestos-in-uk-report

28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/hold on or let go.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
if you love then let go
if you fear then hold on

mind game:

our family has one crazy child.
what shall we do? let go or hold on?

this question is a personality test
just like any other "critical" issue.

but the question is not complete yet.

we assume there is a second family.
that whole family is crazy in our eyes,
but they have one child that is not crazy.
we call that child "the foreign child".

so, what shall we do with our crazy child?

"let go" means:
1. we let our crazy child live with the crazy family
2. we allow the foreign child to live with us

"hold on" means:
1. we force our crazy child to stay with us
2. we refuse the foreign child to join our family

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
people are stupid, cos they were trained to be stupid (educated, brainwashed, demoralized, made disorganized and dependent).

its a slow process, and the most important time are the first ~20 years in life. then they are physically trapped in their learned stupidity, and they will cling to their stupidity and defend their stupidity for the rest of their life.

this is why they are such greedy child "fuckers" and will do anything to protect kids from "false prophets" and "bad teachers". (except for the few privileged kids who inherit wealth, strength, health, truth.)

remember the matrix: we cannot liberate "old" people cos they are too afraid to let go. quotes from the matrix: "time is our enemy" and "We never free a mind once it's reached a certain age. It's dangerous, the mind has trouble letting go. I've seen it before and I'm sorry." (cypher the traitor probably was too old)

in reply to "THE YOUNG PHARAOH )DELETED VIRAL VIDEO)" @ https://www.bitchute.com/video/6OBaDceDAbho/

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
People that self-identify as liberals, for example,
were more likely to face the camera directly,
and were more likely to express “surprise” in their pictures.

Conservatives, meanwhile, on top of being on the whole more white, male, and old,
also ended up expressing more “disgust” in their photos than their liberal counterparts.

https://gizmodo.com/a-new-stanford-study-uses-facial-recognition-to-figure-1846052406

--> optimist vs pessimist, idealist vs realist



Studies focusing on the objective characteristics of human faces
have found some associations between facial morphology and personality features.

For instance, facial symmetry predicts extraversion9.

Another widely studied indicator is the facial width to height ratio (fWHR),
which has been linked to various traits, such as
achievement striving10, deception11, dominance12,
aggressiveness13,14,15,16, and risk-taking17.
The fWHR can be detected with high reliability irrespective of facial hair.
The accuracy of fWHR-based judgements suggests that the human perceptual system
may have evolved to be sensitive to static facial features, such as the relative face width18.

Trait intercorrelations

The structure of the correlations between the scales
was generally similar for the observed test scores and the predicted values,
but some coefficients differed significantly (based on the z test) (see Table 3).

Most notably, predicted openness was more strongly associated
with conscientiousness (negatively) and extraversion (positively),

[ high openness ~ low conscientiousness ]
[ high openness ~ high extraversion ]
[ --> openness = extraversion versus conscientiousness ]

whereas its [openness] association with agreeableness was negative rather than positive.
[ high openness ~ low agreeableness ]

The associations of predicted agreeableness with conscientiousness and neuroticism
were stronger than those between the respective observed scores.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-65358-6


55 changes: 55 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/reciprocal or one-sided relation.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
reciprocal or one-sided relation



2.2 Theory of Interpersonal Relationship

According to Social Exchange theory proposed by George Casper Homans in the year 1958, “give and
take” forms the basis of almost all relationships though their proportions may vary as per the intensity of the
relationship.

In a relationship, every individual has expectations from his/her partner. A relationship without
expectations is meaningless.

According to Social Exchange Theory feelings and emotions ought to be
reciprocated for a successful and long lasting relationship. Relationships can never be one sided. An individual
invests his time and energy in relationships only when he gets something out of it.

There are relationships where
an individual receives less than he gives.

This theory becomes necessary to organisations because it takes two or
more people to form a team and a team cannot exist without “give and take” which is the core of any
relationship. Therefore, this theory emphasises the need for positive interpersonal relationship among
organisation’s members in other to achieve its goals.

http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-5%20Issue-6/Version-2/P0562115125.pdf



Defining Interpersonal Communication

Defining interpersonal communication is no easy task.
While most scholars cannot agree on one single definition,
there is a general consensus that interpersonal communication
is the sharing of meaning and messages between people
who share some level of interdependence.

This meaning can be shared in-person,
via a computer-mediated channel,
or through audio or mobile technologies,

and it can be verbal or nonverbal in nature.

While interpersonal communication research
is usually focused on interactions between two people,
there are some cases of high intimacy and interdependence
that extend this definition to a small group (e.g., a nuclear family).

https://www.mastersincommunications.com/research/interpersonal-communication/






44 changes: 44 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/stress cycle. typical stress response.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
stress cycle. typical stress response of four elements

feminine and childish are similar in that they both are broad.
masculine and mature both are long.

this also makes test questions a bit similar,
but the difference is:

feminine/masculine = mental sex = gender = motorics = behavior in ABSENCE of stress (change or keep, active or passive)
childish/mature = mental age = sensorics = behavior in PRESENCE of stress (change or keep, active or passive)

we model "stress" as a square wave:
on "stress start", the wave goes from zero to 100% in a vertical line.

the first split is between the two sensorics:
childish CHANGE their path to confront the stress source (easy to distract, easy to provoke, rise early, curious),
and they hold the confrontation (they interact with the stress source).
mature KEEP their path to avoid the stress source (ignore stress, repress, hard to distract, rise late),
but they slowly get distracted more and more by the stress source, until they "explode" (rise late).

now all four are at 100% stress,
and our square wave drops back to zero stress.

the second split is between the two motorics:
masculine quickly relax back to zero stress,
they CHANGE their path to confront the new "zero stress" state.
feminine KEEP their path at 100% stress,
they continue their activity in absence of stress.
(air is active both in presence and absence of stress = hyper active),
(earth is only active in absence of stress = "flow goer", and is blocked by presence of stress).
the feminine elements slowly decrease their activity,
and at the end of the cycle,
all elements are back to zero stress (and zero activity).

the next cycle continues with:
stress goes back up to 100%,
childish quickly CHANGE ther path to confront the stress (high activity),
mature KEEP their path (low activity), only to later "join the party" (rise late).
at half cycle, all are at 100% stress and 100% activity, and the stress jumps back to zero.
masculine quickly CHANGE their path, and go back to zero activity.
feminine KEEP their level of activity,
and only slowly return back to zero.


18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions english/fragments/the reaper and the priest.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
the reaper sits at the town's gate
a priest comes along, and sits down next to him.

the priest asks: what are you doing here?
the reaper says: i want to visit the city and take 100 lives.

the priest runs into the city and screams in panic:
the reaper is coming and he wants to take 100 lives!

the citizens panic, run home and lock their doors for many weeks.
5000 people die.

as the priest wants to leave town, the reaper is still sitting there.
the priest says full of anger:
you wanted 100 lives, but you took 5000!

the reaper says: i took only 100 - sick and old people, like every week.
the other lives were taken by fear, the fear that you created.
Loading

0 comments on commit e0a7fd5

Please sign in to comment.