I'd like to bump this issue and also request publishing binaries for arm64 too. This would allow multiarchitecture ACA-py images to be built. Related issue, openwallet-foundation/acapy#2124

@tplooker -- is this project still being maintained? Is there anyone likely to do this work? It's impacting downstream projects. Thanks.

Hi @swcurran our focus is currently on an updated implementation for BBS that is conformant with the latest draft https://identity.foundation/bbs-signature/draft-irtf-cfrg-bbs-signatures.html. As this issue was a bit ambiguous which platforms were you looking for support in and for what language wrappers?

Hey @tplooker, We're specifically looking to be able to include the ursa-bbs-signatures package in multiarchitecture ACA-py images supporting linux/arm64 and linux/386. Currently the ursa-bbs-signatures will only install successfully on a linux/amd64 image. More details here; openwallet-foundation/acapy#2124 (comment)

Understood so this is python wrapper related which I believe was contributed by @karimStekelenburg who might be able to assist with how to enable a release for this architecture?