Fix typos

lazzarello · Oct 13, 2016 · 2b427f7 · 2b427f7
1 parent 9b3ca2f
commit 2b427f7
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 6 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/proposals/resource-metrics-api.md b/docs/proposals/resource-metrics-api.md
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ due to performance issues.
 #### Scheduler
 
 Scheduler in order to schedule best-effort pods requires node level resource usage metrics
-as an average aggreated across 1 minute (the window may change in the future).
+as an average aggregated across 1 minute (the window may change in the future).
 The metrics should be available for all resources supported in the scheduler.
 Currently the scheduler does not need this information, because it schedules best-effort pods
 without considering node usage. But having the metrics available in the API server is a blocker
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ it will be probably possible to provide a reasonable implementation of the featu
 #### Kubernetes dashboard
 
 [Kubernetes dashboard](https://github.com/kubernetes/dashboard) in order to draw graphs requires resource usage
-in timeseries format from relatively long period of time. The aggreations should be also possible on various levels
+in timeseries format from relatively long period of time. The aggregations should be also possible on various levels
 including replication controllers, deployments, services, etc.
 
 Since the use case is complicated it will not be supported initally in the API and they will query Heapster
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ The following query parameters are supported:
 - `labelSelector` - restrict the list of returned objects by labels (list endpoints only)
 
 In the future we may want to introduce the following params:
-`aggreator` (`max`, `min`, `95th`, etc.) and `window` (`1h`, `1d`, `1w`, etc.)
+`aggregator` (`max`, `min`, `95th`, etc.) and `window` (`1h`, `1d`, `1w`, etc.)
 which will allow to get the other aggregates over the custom time window.
 
 ## Further improvements
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Depending on the further requirements the following features may be added:
 - support for more metrics
 - support for application level metrics
 - watch for metrics
-- possibility to query for window sizes and aggreation functions (though single window size/aggregation function per request)
+- possibility to query for window sizes and aggregation functions (though single window size/aggregation function per request)
 - cluster level metrics
 
 <!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->

diff --git a/examples/javaweb-tomcat-sidecar/README.md b/examples/javaweb-tomcat-sidecar/README.md
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Documentation for other releases can be found at
 
 <!-- END MUNGE: UNVERSIONED_WARNING -->
 
-## Java Web Application with Tomcat and Sidercar Container
+## Java Web Application with Tomcat and Sidecar Container
 
 The following document describes the deployment of a Java Web application using Tomcat. Instead of packaging `war` file inside the Tomcat image or mount the `war` as a volume, we use a sidecar container as `war` file provider.
 

diff --git a/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/azure/azure_test.go b/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/azure/azure_test.go
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ func TestReconcileLoadBalancerRemoveAllPortsRemovesFrontendConfig(t *testing.T)
 		t.Error("Expected the loadbalancer to need an update")
 	}
 
-	// ensure we abandonded the frontend ip configuration
+	// ensure we abandoned the frontend ip configuration
 	if len(*lb.Properties.FrontendIPConfigurations) != 0 {
 		t.Error("Expected the loadbalancer to have no frontend ip configuration")
 	}

diff --git a/plugin/pkg/admission/antiaffinity/admission_test.go b/plugin/pkg/admission/antiaffinity/admission_test.go
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ func TestInterPodAffinityAdmission(t *testing.T) {
 						"thisIsAInvalidAffinity": [{}
 					}}`,
 			},
-			// however, we should not got error here
+			// however, we should not get error here
 			errorExpected: false,
 		},
 	}

diff --git a/test/e2e/kubelet_perf.go b/test/e2e/kubelet_perf.go
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ var _ = framework.KubeDescribe("Kubelet [Serial] [Slow]", func() {
 		// affect the runtime cpu usage. Fail the test if prepulling cannot
 		// finish in time.
 		if err := framework.WaitForPodsSuccess(f.Client, api.NamespaceSystem, framework.ImagePullerLabels, imagePrePullingLongTimeout); err != nil {
-			framework.Failf("Image puller didn't complete in %v, not running resource usage test since the metrics might be adultrated", imagePrePullingLongTimeout)
+			framework.Failf("Image puller didn't complete in %v, not running resource usage test since the metrics might be adulterated", imagePrePullingLongTimeout)
 		}
 		nodes := framework.GetReadySchedulableNodesOrDie(f.Client)
 		nodeNames = sets.NewString()

diff --git a/test/e2e/security_context.go b/test/e2e/security_context.go
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ limitations under the License.
 
 /* This test check that SecurityContext parameters specified at the
  * pod or the container level work as intended. These tests cannot be
- * run when the 'SecurityContextDeny' addmissioin controller is not used
+ * run when the 'SecurityContextDeny' admission controller is not used
  * so they are skipped by default.
  */