-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated cherry pick of #26418 #27113
Automated cherry pick of #26418 #27113
Conversation
The 'parent' PR of a cherry-pick PR must have one of the "release-note" or "release-note-action-required" labels, or this PR must follow the standard/parent release note labeling requirement. (release-note-experimental must be explicit for cherry-picks) |
Thanks. LGTM. |
@janetkuo Please help shepherd this cherrypick. The e2e failure was:
|
@k8s-bot e2e test this issue: #IGNORE |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
12 similar comments
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
No test results found. |
1 similar comment
No test results found. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
No test results found. |
1 similar comment
No test results found. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
No test results found. |
1 similar comment
No test results found. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
No test results found. |
1 similar comment
No test results found. |
ok to test pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label. |
No test results found. |
1 similar comment
No test results found. |
GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 02e044a. Please reference the list of currently known flakes when examining this failure. If you request a re-test, you must reference the issue describing the flake. |
Removing LGTM to shut up the bot. |
@roberthbailey you probably want to merge this by hand.... |
Looks like https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/JENKINS-31103 some kinda weird Jenkins SHA limit thingy? |
Maybe #27685 is the culprit? |
I think we need to merge this to to get the "kubernetes-test-go-release-1.2" Jenkins working again. Manual merge? |
No idea what happened here. @kubernetes/test-infra-maintainers did we break PR Jenkins for 1.2 somehow? |
So the merge-bot is angry because 'Jenkins verification' is never run on That's a merge-bot problem, but it doesn't explain the k8s-bot responses. That's a different bot problem for the test-infra team. |
@fabioy kubernetes-test-go-release-1.2 failed on the run after this PR was merged into the release branch. Any other ideas of how to fix that test on the release branch? |
…of-#26418-upstream-release-1.2 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#26418
…of-#26418-upstream-release-1.2 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#26418
Cherry pick of #26418 on release-1.2. @bgrant0607 ptal.