-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix broken cassandra test: Up to date containers + RC of 2 nodes with… #21639
Conversation
Labelling this PR as size/S |
cb2136b
to
23a3a61
Compare
GCE e2e build/test failed for commit cb2136be101132490cb712ebb42a49010b72ca01. |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 23a3a61bdf9ccbe1c8fd0acef4772cb641b78dd9. |
FYI one of the commits here is an updated jar file. That jar file simply builds the latest containers which have the correct internal endpoint |
23a3a61
to
bc18bda
Compare
PTAL @brendandburns @davidopp |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit bc18bdaf5080b211ed644bfd577c2d70dd188c6c. |
@jayunit100 I'd rather rebuild myself. Can you split the PR so that we can merge the updated jar and then I can rebuild the image and push to gcr? |
Sure.
|
236d9c1
to
9e1911c
Compare
Ok @brendandburns i think this is what you meant. look forward to your follow on Jar fix ! thanks ! |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 236d9c18597f1f13b26f24ea8a82e66fb3851a0d. |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 9e1911c5b863e146fb9694074cc5dcaeda84a39f. |
9e1911c
to
4c91cf2
Compare
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 4c91cf2. |
bump @brendandburns |
@k8s-bot test this Tests are more than 48 hours old. Re-running tests. |
@ihmcreery ok here we go, this should go in soon to I guess... That is about half the flakes in examples that should now be addressed. We can sync on the others next Tuesday in sig-testing I guess . Thanks Brendan for the review! Please let us know when the containers are updated as well! |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 4c91cf2. |
ping @lhmcreely maybe we can merge this so we can do another evaluate of the examples/ e2es by this wknd to see what work is left |
err = waitForEndpoint(c, ns, "cassandra") | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
||
By("create and scale rc") | ||
// Create an RC with n nodes in it. Each node will then be verified. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"with n nodes in it" isn't a particularly helpful comment since the n isn't defined in this file...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is only meaningful in context of the diff, because we don't (create, scale to n, verify), but rather (create n, verify). agree its not super useful, it's at best redundant since this can be seen from the code .
Oh never mind my comment, I see it has been LGTMd already |
Fix broken cassandra test: Up to date containers + RC of 2 nodes with…
cc @amygdala |
See also #21645 |
…out rescaling. Update cassandra jar in container build, fixes another portion of #20999