-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: remove sig/api-machinery from OWNERS files that sig/etcd owns #128213
Conversation
@aaron-prindle: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/triage accepted |
/assign @serathius |
Probably we can add a etcd team in the OWNER_ALIASES file. |
/lgtm /hold |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: d2a5d93862c598bef0b408a67ee6c419b0bdbd37
|
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aaron-prindle, dims, jpbetz, serathius The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/unhold |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR removes sig/api-machinery from OWNERS files that likely sig/etcd should solely own. This is related to the issue #127336 that was filed during the sig/api-machinery bi-weekly bugscrub. The gist of this issue is that sig/api-machinery is flagged on PRs that should likely solely belong to sig/etcd. Fully "fixing" this issue would also likely include using OWNERS
filters:
for top level directories and setting specific files to be delegated to sig/etcd (for example -hack/lib/etcd.sh
, etc.) As such this PR is only part of the solution to #127336. For additional context on the sig/etcd label and OWNERS, see the original PR that added the sig/etcd label to OWNERS here: #125679Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #127336
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:
/sig api-machinery
/sig etcd
/triage approved