-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Patch instead of SSA for Pod Disruption condition #121103
Conversation
76819e1
to
8e34a95
Compare
For the record, failing integration test after 8e34a95: |
/assign @alculquicondor |
This change in analogous to: kubernetes/kubernetes#121103. Required because of kubernetes/kubernetes#118261
This change in analogous to: kubernetes/kubernetes#121103. Required because of kubernetes/kubernetes#118261
/kind regression Thanks for the PR. Please include "Fixes a regression in default configurations in $version-that-enabled-disruption-condition-by-default ..." |
Sure, added to the release note. I want to cherry-pick this down to 1.26. |
/hold cancel |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: dce2e98adc820b4abca8b03f3a8cf11b09e1cb7f
|
thanks, go ahead and open the picks back to 1.26/1.27/1.28 |
…03-upstream-release-1.28 Automated cherry pick of #121103: Use Patch instead of SSA for Pod Disruption condition
…03-upstream-release-1.26 Automated cherry pick of #121103: Use Patch instead of SSA for Pod Disruption condition
…03-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of #121103: Use Patch instead of SSA for Pod Disruption condition
Changelog suggestion Fixed a regression in default configurations in that enabled PodDisruptionConditions by default,
that then prevented the control plane's pod garbage collector from deleting pods that contained duplicated field keys (env. variables with repeated keys or container ports). |
Thanks, applied the note, just rephrased slightly the first part. PTAL. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind regression
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #118261
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: