Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Csi translation portworx #103447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2021
Merged

Csi translation portworx #103447

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2021

Conversation

trierra
Copy link
Contributor

@trierra trierra commented Jul 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add support for Portworx plugin to csi-translation-lib

in support of csi-migration proposal here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/storage/csi-migration.md

Will help with migration of in-tree Portworx plugin to Portworx CSI.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #
2589

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Add support for Portworx plugin to csi-translation-lib. Alpha release

Portworx CSI driver is required to enable migration.
This PR adds support of the `CSIMigrationPortworx` feature gate, which can be enabled by:

1. Adding the feature flag to the kube-controller-manager `--feature-gates=CSIMigrationPortworx=true` 
2. Adding the feature flag to the kubelet config:

featureGates:
  CSIMigrationPortworx: true

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

/sig storage
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jul 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @trierra!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @trierra. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/dependency Issues or PRs related to dependency changes sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from ahg-g, davidz627 and a team July 2, 2021 20:01
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch from 354103e to be30295 Compare July 2, 2021 20:03
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jul 2, 2021
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch 2 times, most recently from 7ebbe9b to cd35090 Compare July 2, 2021 20:25
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 2, 2021
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch from cd35090 to e98bb90 Compare July 2, 2021 20:27
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 2, 2021
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch from dbfb24a to 923d13f Compare November 15, 2021 19:46
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 15, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 15, 2021
@lauralorenz lauralorenz mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2021
Open
12 tasks
@yujuhong
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

for the cmd/kubelet change

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g, Jiawei0227, jsafrane, msau42, sttts, trierra, yujuhong

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Nov 15, 2021
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch from 923d13f to 75bfe66 Compare November 16, 2021 18:19
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Nov 16, 2021
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch from 75bfe66 to 22f572b Compare November 16, 2021 18:39
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 16, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 16, 2021
@trierra
Add support for Portworx to csi-translation lib
3af11fc 
Signed-off-by: Oksana Naumov <trierra.dev@gmail.com>
@trierra trierra force-pushed the csi-translation-portworx branch from 22f572b to 3af11fc Compare November 16, 2021 21:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 16, 2021
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 16, 2021

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 16, 2021
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 17, 2021

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 17, 2021
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 17, 2021

/milestone 1.23

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@msau42: The provided milestone is not valid for this repository. Milestones in this repository: [next-candidate, v1.16, v1.17, v1.18, v1.19, v1.20, v1.21, v1.22, v1.23, v1.24, v1.25, v1.26]

Use /milestone clear to clear the milestone.

In response to this:

/milestone 1.23

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 17, 2021

/milestone v1.23

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Nov 17, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@trierra: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link false /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link false /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-grpc 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link false /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-grpc
pull-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-windows-containerd 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link false /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-windows-containerd
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-http-connect 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link true /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-http-connect
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ipvs 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link false /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ipvs
pull-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-network-policies 4834076c92df84c822226be5568e601187a16289 link false /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-network-policies

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Nov 17, 2021

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8d9e424 into kubernetes:master Nov 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@msau42 msau42 msau42 left review comments

@davidz627 davidz627 Awaiting requested review from davidz627

@Huang-Wei Huang-Wei Awaiting requested review from Huang-Wei

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev Awaiting requested review from SergeyKanzhelev

@gnufied gnufied Awaiting requested review from gnufied

@jsafrane jsafrane Awaiting requested review from jsafrane

@Jiawei0227 Jiawei0227 Awaiting requested review from Jiawei0227

Assignees

@sttts sttts

@Huang-Wei Huang-Wei

@derekwaynecarr derekwaynecarr

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev

@saad-ali saad-ali

@Jiawei0227 Jiawei0227

@msau42 msau42

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/apiserver area/cloudprovider area/dependency Issues or PRs related to dependency changes area/ipvs area/kubeadm area/kubectl area/kubelet area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
SIG Node CI/Test Board
Archived in project
SIG Node: code and documentation PRs
Archived in project
Milestone
v1.23
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.