Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Preference/optional form of PodSpec.NodeSelector #8008

Closed
davidopp opened this issue May 8, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Preference/optional form of PodSpec.NodeSelector #8008

davidopp opened this issue May 8, 2015 · 6 comments
Labels
area/api Indicates an issue on api area. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling.

Comments

@davidopp
Copy link
Member

davidopp commented May 8, 2015

Borg has preferences a.k.a. "soft constraints." We should have the same thing in Kubernetes. (Try to place this pod on a node that satisfies this selector, but if you can't, schedule it anywhere else.) We could call it PodSpec.PreferredNodeSelector or something like that.

Sorry if this issue is already filed but I didn't immediately see it.
@davidopp davidopp added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. team/master labels May 8, 2015
@davidopp davidopp added this to the v1.0-post milestone May 8, 2015
@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

This is related to #367

@davidopp davidopp mentioned this issue May 26, 2015
Closed
@timothysc
Copy link
Member

subscribe

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added area/api Indicates an issue on api area. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. labels May 26, 2015
@gabrtv
Copy link

gabrtv commented Jul 7, 2015

/subscribe

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 removed this from the v1.0-post milestone Jul 24, 2015
@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

davidopp commented Dec 7, 2015

This is part of #18261

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

Can we close this one then, and rally on the proposals?

@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

davidopp commented Dec 9, 2015

Agreed.

@davidopp davidopp closed this as completed Dec 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/api Indicates an issue on api area. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@timothysc @gabrtv @bgrant0607 @davidopp