Skip to content

CRI: seccomp format is changed from docker 1.12 to 1.13. #52827

Closed
@Random-Liu

Description

Ref moby/moby#27978.

  1. We are currently relying on docker seccomp profile format;
  2. We are supporing docker 1.11-1.13.

As CRI runtime, which format should we follow? Or should we support both?

@yujuhong @feiskyer @mrunalp @mikebrow @timstclair
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node-bugs @kubernetes/sig-node-api-reviews

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area/kubelet-apilifecycle/rottenDenotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.sig/nodeCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions