Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubeadm v1.8 release tracking issue #51841

Closed
luxas opened this issue Sep 1, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

kubeadm v1.8 release tracking issue #51841

luxas opened this issue Sep 1, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/kubeadm kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.
Milestone

Comments

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented Sep 1, 2017

On request by @jdumars and the @kubernetes/kubernetes-release-managers, I'm creating this tracking issue for the kubernetes/kubeadm repo.

I'm tracking what we need to get done for kubeadm to be in a release-able state in this milestone: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/milestone/3

On a high level, all required PRs are lgtm'd, they will be merged in the coming days as the SQ gets to them.
There will be lots of work with testing now that the v1.8-specific tests are set up.

Actions required by the release team or vice versa will be communicated via this channel.
When all the kubeadm tasks are done, we can close this meta-issue.

Sounds good to you?

@luxas luxas added area/kubeadm kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. labels Sep 1, 2017
@luxas luxas added this to the v1.8 milestone Sep 1, 2017
@jdumars
Copy link
Member

jdumars commented Sep 1, 2017

@luxas thank you very much for helping improve coordination with kubeadm!

@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@luxas we have a kubeadm-related feature tracking issue at the features repo - kubernetes/enhancements#11.

Any updates planned for 1.8 to be reflected at the features repo?

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

[MILESTONENOTIFIER] Milestone Labels Complete

@luxas @roberthbailey @timothysc

Issue label settings:

  • sig/cluster-lifecycle: Issue will be escalated to these SIGs if needed.
  • priority/critical-urgent: Never automatically move out of a release milestone; continually escalate to contributor and SIG through all available channels.
  • kind/feature: New functionality.
Additional instructions available here The commands available for adding these labels are documented here

@luxas
Copy link
Member Author

luxas commented Sep 7, 2017

@idvoretskyi I've done the required modifications to the release notes and splitted the "kubeadm upgrades with selfhosting" feature to one for upgrading and one for self-hosting as they mature separately

@luxas
Copy link
Member Author

luxas commented Sep 13, 2017

Update, https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/milestone/3 contains four items:

@jdumars ACK? The most important one is 2), not sure what to do there in the meantime.

@jdumars
Copy link
Member

jdumars commented Sep 14, 2017

ack - I'll keep an eye on this as best I can. Please let me know directly if things change for better or worse. I have a lot of irons in the fire at the moment. :)

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Sep 18, 2017

@luxas looks like there are 5 items now :)

@jdumars
Copy link
Member

jdumars commented Sep 21, 2017

@luxas - we need to determine (today if possible) if any of the kubeadm work is truly release blocking. If so, please add the release-blocker label and update this issue with relevant issues/PRs. Thanks!

@luxas
Copy link
Member Author

luxas commented Sep 29, 2017

Nope, the things that were outstanding were fixed in the go. I manually tested kubeadm v1.8.0-rc.1 packages on all possible and impossible OSes and configurations as well successfully (well, I had to tweak the docs a bit, but anyway 😄)

We're gonna have some nonblocking cherrypicks to v1.8 (for instance we found that the kubelet asks for a cert although it has one already when cert rotation is enabled, etc), and small UX improvements, but we had nothing that truly blocked the release in the end, which is awesome!

I think this can now be closed 🎉 🌯

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/kubeadm kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants