Skip to content

CRI: using typed and structured fields instead of annotations  #39130

Closed
@feiskyer

Description

CRI supports AppArmor, Seccomp and Sysctls via annotations today, we should move them to typed and structured fields instead. (refer here)

cc @yujuhong @euank @kubernetes/sig-node-misc

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

sig/nodeCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions