-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kubernetes-e2e-gce-master-on-cvm has been broken since 5/31 #26850
Comments
An alternate resolution to this bug is that we abandon CVM masters entirely in open source, but that's a larger decision. |
We want to keep CVM working for now (which is why I stuck this test into the 1.3 tab in Jenkins). @girishkalele -- can you please take a look tomorrow? |
I'll fix it - should be straightforward - #26335 actually was to fix the breakage in DNS when we moved to GCI masters, the skydns yaml files were moved and the dns pod is probably not even starting up in CVM masters. |
Is there a way I can ask the testbot to trigger this specific Jenkins (CVM-on-Master) test on my pull request ? The fix is simple - svc and rc DNS files were renamed.
|
@girishkalele: No, but it's easy to |
Got an error setting just the KUBE_OS_DISTRIBUTION flag.
Then, I set all image related KUBE variables to the below and the master doesn't get ready. KUBE_GCE_NODE_IMAGE=container-v1-3-v20160604 |
@girishkalele: That last set is exactly what
|
The Debian debian-8 images are not visible when I do I think it is not accessible to folks who don't have read perms for google_containers. |
That shouldn't be launching |
Closed via #26902 Merged at 2:09 PM, Jenkins jobs started passing right after. |
We have a test suite called
kubernetes-e2e-gce-master-on-cvm
running to allow us to, in theory, switch back from GCI masters to Container VM masters at any point.We succeeded at http://kubekins.dls.corp.google.com/job/kubernetes-e2e-gce-master-on-cvm/lastStableBuild/ (c1c0567) and then failed at http://kubekins.dls.corp.google.com/job/kubernetes-e2e-gce-master-on-cvm/338 (ee412ef), and it's all consistently DNS related issues, so I'm pretty sure #26335 broke this suite entirely.
It's also somewhat blocking me from evaluating a new version of Container VM, but not really - I think we're safe to evaluate it on nodes only for now.
cc @roberthbailey @thockin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: