Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Masters in large (>1000 Nodes) clusters need more space on disks #25660

Closed
gmarek opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Masters in large (>1000 Nodes) clusters need more space on disks #25660

gmarek opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
area/platform/gce area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.
Milestone
v1.3

Comments

@gmarek
Copy link
Contributor

gmarek commented May 16, 2016

On GCE by default we have a 10G boot disk that stores all logs and etcd data. It's enough for 1000 Nodes, but larger clusters can run out of space.

@zmerlynn @alex-mohr @wojtek-t
@gmarek gmarek added sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. area/platform/gce area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider labels May 16, 2016
@gmarek gmarek added this to the v1.3 milestone May 16, 2016
@gmarek gmarek added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label May 16, 2016
@gmarek gmarek mentioned this issue May 16, 2016
Merged
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2016
Merge pull request #25670 from gmarek/root-disk
059980e 
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Make bigger master root disks in GCE for large clusters

Ref. #25660

cc @zmerlynn @wojtek-t
@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this was fixed by #25670.

openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2020
@k8s-publishing-bot
Merge pull request kubernetes#25660 from p0lyn0mial/release-3.11-cve-…
0bf83f7 
…invalid-redirect

Bug 1852692: CVE-2020-8559  compromised node could escalate to cluster level privileges

Origin-commit: e566b4f19560b2f9f68827885bb3b185200613ba
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/platform/gce area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gmarek @mikedanese @roberthbailey