Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPA scale-in: is pod resource usage taken into account to prioritize pods to be deleted ? #124821

Open
remiville opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 8 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling.

Comments

@remiville
Copy link

Hello,

I know that in case of node resource pressure, the controller prioritizes pods to be evicted, for example in case of node memory pressure, pods using more memory than requested are prioritised for deletion.

But for HPA scale-in I struggle to find if and how pods are sorted to prioritize them for deletion.

While looking at the PodDeletionCost feature PR I found this priorization comment in the code https://github.com/ahg-g/kubernetes/blob/2d88d2d993b36c231fdc7537212685544469c517/pkg/controller/controller_utils.go#L785

Does it mean that no resource usage is taken into account when the controller has to select pods to be deleted during a scale in event ?

For example, if a scale-in occurs because the CPU usage is lower than the threshold set in the HPA, the controller will select pods to be deleted without prioritizing them by their current CPU usage, right ?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels May 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Contributor

/sig autoscaling

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels May 12, 2024
@ishaankalra
Copy link

Can I give it a try?

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Contributor

Can I give it a try?

Need to wait for confirmation and triage from the sig autoscaling team.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 12, 2024
@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 12, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 10, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants