The ASan report is as follows:

AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==74==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x6030bf3b722e (pc 0x7fc277c6ae10 bp 0x7ffe22b2c9a0 sp 0x7ffe22b2c158 T0)
==74==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
    #0 0x7fc277c6ae10  /build/glibc-eX1tMB/glibc-2.31/string/../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S:365
    #1 0x49d947 in __asan_memcpy (/home/docker/kiravision/test/clang-memtest+0x49d947)
    #2 0x50e00a in TF_TString_ResizeUninitialized(TF_TString*, unsigned long) /opt/tensorflow/include/tensorflow/core/platform/ctstring_internal.h:278:7
    #3 0x50ba34 in TF_TString_Copy(TF_TString*, char const*, unsigned long) /opt/tensorflow/include/tensorflow/core/platform/ctstring_internal.h:389:17
    #4 0x50bbac in Model::restore(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) /home/docker/kiravision/cppflow/src/Model.cpp:107:5
    #5 0x4e98e2 in KiraVision::LearnedModel::LearnedModel(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) /home/docker/kiravision/src/LearnedModel.cpp:12:13
    #6 0x4e28ed in KiraVision::TableDetector::TableDetector(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, KiraVision::LogLevel const&) /home/docker/kiravision/src/TableDetector.cpp:13:24
    #7 0x4d058a in main /home/docker/kiravision/test/memtest.cpp:16:31
    #8 0x7fc277bd30b2 in __libc_start_main /build/glibc-eX1tMB/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:308:16
    #9 0x425ccd in _start (/home/docker/kiravision/test/clang-memtest+0x425ccd)

AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV /build/glibc-eX1tMB/glibc-2.31/string/../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S:365
==74==ABORTING

The problem was incorrect initalization of a `TF_TString`. The existing
code initialized it as `new TF_Tstring` (which is not really any kind of
initalization, just memory allocation). `TF_TString`'s have to be
initialized with `TF_TString_Initialize` before they an be used. The
fact that the offending code is using a `unique_ptr` to ensure deletion
of the `TF_TString` makes it all a little clunky.

…-issue