[CVAT] Update quality metric to precision #2965
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue tracking
Context behind the change
Depends on cvat-ai/cvat#8888
These changes make the annotation quality more understandable from the annotator viewpoint. Simple precision has a flaw that if not enough annotations is provided, only the provided ones will be checked. This is workarounded by considering empty frames virtually annotated as "empty", which makes it impossible to provide not enough annotations. This change will increase the quality metrics in assignments in general, as accuracy includes both gt as user annotations in the denominator, while precision includes only the user annotations.
match_empty_framesto the newempty_is_annotatedHow has this been tested?
Release plan
Potential risks; What to monitor; Rollback plan