Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Align JSKOS ConceptScheme properties with MOD vocabulary #104

Open
nichtich opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Align JSKOS ConceptScheme properties with MOD vocabulary #104

nichtich opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 2 comments
Milestone
1.0.0

Comments

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

The MOD vocabulary collects classes and properties for description of ontologies. An ontology (or any other controlled vocabulary) in JSKOS is an instance of JSKOS ConceptScheme. BARTOC collects metdata about these vocabularies and exposes the metadata in JSKOS format, with some additional properties (which might become part of JSKOS specification): EXAMPLES, ACCESS, ADDRESS, CONTACT, FORMAT. We also don't fully use JSKOS Distribution yet.

Anyway, I comparison of MOD and JSKOS/BARTOC could improve the data model and result in an another mapping from JSKOS to RDF (see current JSON-LD context).
@biswanathdutta
Copy link

@nichtich yes, we can do a mapping between JSKOS/BARTOC and MOD. As suggested above, some of the properties from MOD proposition may also be adopted to the BARTOC catalogue. Let us discuss this.

@nichtich nichtich mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2021
Open
@nichtich nichtich modified the milestones: 0.9.0, 1.0.0 Nov 9, 2023
@nichtich
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like MOD is used in AgroPortal, so alignment is needed in NFDI to integrate data from BARTOC and from AgroPortal. Current repository is https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD, currently being worked on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nichtich @biswanathdutta