Replies: 1 comment 10 replies
-
Hey— thanks for filing this, hadn’t been aware macOS users were running into this. I think it could make sense for backrest to try to keep the path static and instead use the restic executable itself to check the version (via version command). Will macOS retain the full disk access permissions even if the binary checksum changes? Is the path the only thing that matters? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
10 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I just started it using 2-3 days ago so still getting the hang of it but so far liking it. It's simple and it just works without getting in the way or how
restic
is configured.However I noticed this when I upgraded from
1.5.0
to1.5.1
that I had to give fresh permission to Photos/etc access, Full Disk Access, and also approval forobjective-see/LuLu
as well. Because apparently every version is referenced from its path which contains the version number in it.Can it be avoided? Or is there already a way that can avoid it (maybe I am not aware of that)?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions