Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support rule recursion and fix cardinality errors #880

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Improved messages
  • Loading branch information
SimonCockx committed Dec 10, 2024
commit e6439feab3ff40821612f87d2a0070fd4e41de94
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ public void checkOnlyExistsExpression(RosettaOnlyExistsExpression expr) {

RMetaAnnotatedType parentType = null;
if (parent != null) {
isSingleCheck(parent, parent, null, "The `only exists` operation requires a single cardinality input");
isSingleCheck(parent, parent, null, "The `only exists` operator requires a single cardinality input");
parentType = typeProvider.getRMetaAnnotatedType(parent);
} else {
if (cardinalityProvider.isImplicitVariableMulti(expr)) {
Expand Down
Loading