-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refine and document Policy WG strategy and approach #293
Comments
Created a parent / epic to keep track of this #298 |
Thanks @eddie-knight , I'll have a look at this today. |
Why does this working group exist?We exist to define and document best practice and process for implementing compliant cloud infrastructure, while streamlining the process for contributions from financial institutions in a frictionless manner. What are the main, high level objectives this group is working toward?
How are each of those objectives being pursued?
How is work tracked relating to each of these objectives?
What is the best way for a new contributor to begin contributing to this work?
|
Per @abdullahgarcia on the WG call today, the sequence of work will be to establish a MVP approach using EKS, OCP, and Fargate. Developing a process for gathering FI input on policies will come after confirmation from the policy consumers (FIs + Reproducible Infra WG) |
Next step is to get this all documented in an easily consumable fashion for both users and contributors. Additional feedback is encouraged on this thread as documentation work continues. |
There are a few things that are left to solidify for the policy WG. This may be clear in the WG member's minds, but it should be made clear in some form of documentation so that everyone is on the same page.
Some questions to start:
From #298:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: