Nominating @fuweid as etcd reviewer

### Who would you like to nominate?

I would like to propose @fuweid for role of [reviewer](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/Documentation/contributor-guide/community-membership.md#requirements-1).

@fuweid has demonstrated excellent knowledge in crucial areas of both etcd and grpc-gateway/protobuf. They were instrumental in landing https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16595 (refer discussion in https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16454).

They have [reviewed over 150 PRs](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pulls?q=is%3Apr+-author%3Afuweid+reviewed-by%3Afuweid+) and [authored over 60 merged pr's](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Afuweid+is%3Amerged).

@fuweid's technical knowledge is a tremendous asset to the project and their participation as [the fourth most active contributor to etcd](https://etcd.devstats.cncf.io/d/66/developer-activity-counts-by-companies?orgId=1&var-period_name=Last%20quarter&var-metric=contributions&var-repogroup_name=All&var-country_name=All&var-companies=All) makes them an excellent candidate for an etcd reviewer.

### Requirements

- [X] I have reviewed the [community membership guidelines](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/Documentation/contributor-guide/community-membership.md)
- [X] The members are actively contributing to 1 or more etcd subprojects
- [X] The members are being sponsored by two current reviewers or a current maintainer.

### How do the new members meet the regular active contribution requirements?

- [x] member for at least 3 months. [Joined April 2023](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/15665).

- [x] Primary reviewer for at least 5 PRs to the codebase:
  - https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16595
  - https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16547
  - https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16371
  - https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16252
  - https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16092


- [x] Reviewed or contributed at least 20 substantial PRs to the codebase, examples:
  - Improving testing compute capacity through large runners https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16440 
  - Making test output easier to understand by reducing noise https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16439
  - Improving robustness test suite https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16310
  - Adding features to our benchmarking tooling https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16196
  - Deflaking complex tests (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/15489, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16558, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16549, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16268, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16173, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/15920, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/15667)
  - Finding and fixing race in grpc server start code https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/15509
  - Finding issue with closing listeners https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/15446#discussion_r1153075486
  - Finding issue with etcd scripts and rewriting them to strict mode greatly improving their reliability and quality https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/15519
  - Significantly overhauling etcd codebase linting (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16634, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16628, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16626, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16608, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16605, https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/16601) 


- [x] Knowledgeable about the codebase.
  - @fuweid is a project go to person for gRPC and protobuf
  - @fuweid has contributed to etcd robustness testing suite which is crucial knowledge moving forward
  - @fuweid has significantly improved etcd codebase quality recently with linting overhauls


- [x] Sponsored by two active maintainers.
  - @spzala, IBM
  - @ahrtr, VMware


- [x] Sponsors must be from multiple member companies to demonstrate integration across community.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Nominating @fuweid as etcd reviewer #16650

Who would you like to nominate?

Requirements

How do the new members meet the regular active contribution requirements?

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development