-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discussion: Webpack Blocks #598
Comments
Anything that simplifies webpack configs is a good thing! Do you think the blocks they have already created would do everything the current webpack configs do or would custom blocks need to be created? |
I havent used webpack blocks yet but it seems like it can. I'll try to make a PR for this over the next couple of weeks (or early January) |
I'd like to wait for couple of weeks and see how people works with it. Many developers use this boilerplate on production project so we should use bleeding edge technologies carefully. |
@chentsulin good idea. Lets wait for a month or so. Mid-January? |
It's ok. we can send a PR to open discussion at that time. |
It's been a while since this was last discussed. There's a PR open which adds happypack support. This will significantly improve reduce the build time of the boilerplate. |
I believe this package significantly simplifies webpack configurations and that we should consider it the default for the project:
https://github.com/andywer/webpack-blocks
Inspired by:
https://twitter.com/dan_abramov/status/806246431707320320
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: