Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion: Webpack Blocks #598

Closed
amilajack opened this issue Dec 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Discussion: Webpack Blocks #598

amilajack opened this issue Dec 6, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@amilajack
Copy link
Member

amilajack commented Dec 6, 2016

I believe this package significantly simplifies webpack configurations and that we should consider it the default for the project:

https://github.com/andywer/webpack-blocks

Inspired by:
https://twitter.com/dan_abramov/status/806246431707320320

Thoughts?

@dustintownsend
Copy link
Collaborator

Anything that simplifies webpack configs is a good thing!

Do you think the blocks they have already created would do everything the current webpack configs do or would custom blocks need to be created?

@amilajack
Copy link
Member Author

amilajack commented Dec 9, 2016

I havent used webpack blocks yet but it seems like it can. I'll try to make a PR for this over the next couple of weeks (or early January)

@chentsulin
Copy link
Member

I'd like to wait for couple of weeks and see how people works with it. Many developers use this boilerplate on production project so we should use bleeding edge technologies carefully.

@amilajack
Copy link
Member Author

@chentsulin good idea. Lets wait for a month or so. Mid-January?

@chentsulin
Copy link
Member

It's ok. we can send a PR to open discussion at that time.

@amilajack
Copy link
Member Author

It's been a while since this was last discussed. There's a PR open which adds happypack support. This will significantly improve reduce the build time of the boilerplate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants