- Documentation
- [Email](mailto:joe at deepc.io)
PassiveRecord is an extremely lightweight in-memory pseudo-relational algebra.
We implement a simplified subset of AR's interface in pure Ruby.
Do you need to track objects by ID and look them up again, or look them up based on attributes, or even utilize some relational semantics, but have no real need for persistence?
PassiveRecord may be right for you!
- Build relationships with belongs_to, has_one and has_many
- Query on attributes and associations
- Supports many-to-many and self-referential relationships
- No database required!
- Just
include PassiveRecord
to get started
require 'passive_record'
class Model
include PassiveRecord
end
class Dog < Model
attr_accessor :breed
belongs_to :child
end
class Child < Model
has_one :dog
belongs_to :parent
end
class Parent < Model
has_many :children
has_many :dogs, :through => :children
end
# Let's build some models!
parent = Parent.create
=> Parent (id: 1, child_ids: [], dog_ids: [])
child = parent.create_child
=> Child (id: 1, dog_id: nil, parent_id: 1)
dog = child.create_dog(breed: "Pug")
=> Dog (id: 1, child_id: 1, breed: "Pug")
# Inverse relationships
dog.child
Dog.find_by child: child
=> Dog (id: 1, child_id: 1, breed: "Pug")
# Has many through
parent.dogs
=> [ ...has_many :through relation... ]
parent.dogs.all
=> [Dog (id: 1, child_id: 1, breed: "Pug")]
# Nested queries
Dog.find_all_by(child: { parent: parent })
=> [Dog (id: 1, child_id: 1, breed: "Pug")]
A class including PassiveRecord will gain the following new instance and class methods.
A class Role
which is declared to include PassiveRecord
will gain the following instance methods:
role.update(attrs_hash)
role.destroy
role.to_h
- We override
role.inspect
to show ID and visible attributes
A class User
which is declared to include PassiveRecord
will gain the following class methods:
User.all
andUser.each
User.create(name: 'Aloysius')
User.descendants
User.destroy(id)
User.destroy_all
User.each
enumerates overUser.all
, givingUser.count
,User.first
, etc.User.find(id_or_ids)
User.find_by(conditions)
User.find_all_by(conditions)
User.where(conditions)
(returns aPassiveRecord::Query
object)
A model Child
which is declared belongs_to :parent
will gain:
child.parent
child.parent_id
child.parent=
child.parent_id=
A model Parent
which declares has_one :child
will gain:
parent.child
parent.child_id
parent.child=
parent.child_id=
parent.create_child(attrs)
A model Parent
which declares has_many :children
or has_and_belongs_to_many :children
will gain:
parent.children
(returns aRelation
, documented below)parent.children=
parent.children_ids
parent.children_ids=
parent.children<<
parent.create_child(attrs)
parent.children.all?(&predicate)
parent.children.empty?
parent.children.where(conditions)
(returns aCore::Query
)parent.children.pluck(attribute)
parent.children.sum(attribute)
parent.children.average(attribute)
parent.children.mode(attribute)
Parent models which declare has_many :children
gain a parent.children
instance that returns an explicit PassiveRecord relation object, which has the following public methods:
parent.children.all
parent.children.each
enumerates overparent.children.all
, givingparent.children.count
,parent.children.first
, etc.parent.children.all?(&predicate)
parent.children.empty?
parent.children.where(conditions)
(returns aCore::Query
)parent.children<<
(insert a new child into the relation)
You can acquire Core::Query
objects through the class method where
. These are chainable, accept nested conditions that traverse relationships, and understand scopes defined as class methods. The query object will have the following public methods:
Post.where(conditions).all
Post.where(conditions).each
enumerates overwhere(conditions).all
, so we havewhere(conditions).count
,where(conditions).first
, etc.Post.where(conditions).create(attrs)
Post.where(conditions).first_or_create(attrs)
Post.where(conditions).pluck(attr)
Post.where(conditions).sum(attr)
Post.where(conditions).average(attr)
Post.where(conditions).mode(attr)
Post.where(conditions).where(further_conditions)
(chaining)Post.where.not(conditions)
(negation)Post.where(conditions).or(Post.where(conditions))
(disjunction)Post.active.recent
(scoping with class methods that return queries; supports chaining)
conditions
here is expected to be a hash of attribute values. Note that there is special behavior for certain kinds of values.
- Ranges select models with an attribute covered by the range (behaving like
BETWEEN
). For instance you might query for users with birthdays between yesterday and today withUser.where(birthday: 1.day.ago...1.day.from_now)
- Arrays select models with an attribute whose value is in the array (behaving like
IN
), so for instance you may query for users whose job title is included in a list of job titles like:User.where(job_title: ['manager', 'developer', 'qa'])
- Hash values (subhashes) select models with related models who attributes match the inner hash. So
Doctor.where(appointments: { patient: patient })
would lookup doctors whose appointments include an appointment withpatient
.
before_create :call_a_method
after_create :call_another_method, :and_then_call_another_one
before_update do manually_invoke(a_method) end
after_update { or_use_a_block }
before_destroy :something
after_destroy { something_else }
- Approaches exist that use ActiveRecord directly, and then override various methods in such a way to prevent AR from trying to persist the model. The canonical example here is the tableless model approach, and the use case given there is a model that wraps around sending an email. This is maybe interesting because, similar to the round-trip with a database, sending mail is externally "effectful" (and so, for instance, you may wish to take additional care around confirmation or retry logic, in order ensure you are not sending the same message more than once.)
- These approaches are seen as somewhat hacky today, given that ActiveModel can give plain old Ruby objects a lot of the augmentations that ActiveRecord gives, such as validations, hooks and attribute management. However I don't really see a way to do relations that interoperate with ActiveRecord the way you could, at least to some degree, with tableless models.
- It's not really clear to me yet if it's interesting for PassiveRecord to be able to interoperate smoothly with ActiveRecord relations. It seems like we might be able to pull some similar tricks as the "tableless" approach in order to permit at least some relations to work between them. But their intentions are so different I can't help but think there would be very strange bugs lurking in any such integration -- so the encouraged architecture would be a complete separation between active and passive models.
Copyright (c) 2016 Joseph Weissman