Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: deglobalization of bls_legacy_scheme 3/N #6508

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

refactor: deglobalization of bls_legacy_scheme 3/N #6508

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
544031d
fix: do not pass param 'modOrder' for bls::PrivateKey
knst Dec 13, 2024
b5cd09e
fix: rename argument name for IsTriviallyValid for protx
knst Dec 13, 2024
f1a7e95
fix: condition of bls activation to make work even from block 1 in sp…
knst Dec 24, 2024
4acdd79
refactor: remove general constructor of BLS objects from bytes, add o…
knst Dec 23, 2024
f728fc9
refactor: drop legacy flag from CActiveMasternodeInfo
knst Dec 23, 2024
caedaba
refactor: remove CheckMalleable without bls scheme argument
knst Dec 24, 2024
394d649
feat: use basic scheme for RPC `bls generate` by default
knst Dec 23, 2024
7cbb26b
style: clang suggestion for bls rpcs
knst Dec 25, 2024
26c058a
refactor: optimize usages bls_ies.h and bls.h
knst Dec 23, 2024
91f10b1
refactor: removed unused functions from bls_ies
knst Dec 24, 2024
99e9c65
feat: use Basic scheme only for public key serialization in bls_ies
knst Dec 24, 2024
5ea9ff9
feat: enforce using _legacy suffix for protx commands; no more guessi…
knst Dec 23, 2024
954e5ef
fix: undefined behaviour in evo RPC calls of RPCHelpMan
knst Dec 26, 2024
ce18dcd
refactor: enforce passing bls scheme for each call of sign by BLS
knst Dec 24, 2024
6fa033e
feat: p2p message mnauth to always use Basic BLS scheme
knst Dec 24, 2024
5c36bb2
docs: add TODO about bls global variable
knst Dec 24, 2024
f76f943
docs: comments about invariant for CBLSSecretKey for bls scheme
knst Dec 23, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
fix: condition of bls activation to make work even from block 1 in sp… 
…ecialtxman

It used to be incorrectly processed of v19 is activated from block 1
  • Loading branch information
@knst
knst committed Dec 27, 2024
commit f1a7e95096cfdfee0f7613b41f1729dbcdc2c21a
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ bool CSpecialTxProcessor::ProcessSpecialTxsInBlock(const CBlock& block, const CB
nTimeMnehf += nTime7 - nTime6;
LogPrint(BCLog::BENCHMARK, " - m_mnhfman: %.2fms [%.2fs]\n", 0.001 * (nTime7 - nTime6), nTimeMnehf * 0.000001);

if (Params().GetConsensus().V19Height == pindex->nHeight + 1) {
if (DeploymentActiveAfter(pindex, m_consensus_params, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_V19) && bls::bls_legacy_scheme.load()) {
// NOTE: The block next to the activation is the one that is using new rules.
// V19 activated just activated, so we must switch to the new rules here.
bls::bls_legacy_scheme.store(false);
Expand All @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ bool CSpecialTxProcessor::UndoSpecialTxsInBlock(const CBlock& block, const CBloc
auto bls_legacy_scheme = bls::bls_legacy_scheme.load();

try {
if (Params().GetConsensus().V19Height == pindex->nHeight + 1) {
if (!DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_consensus_params, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_V19) && !bls_legacy_scheme) {
// NOTE: The block next to the activation is the one that is using new rules.
// Removing the activation block here, so we must switch back to the old rules.
bls::bls_legacy_scheme.store(true);
Expand Down