Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add blocks conflicting with ChainLocks to block index #2923

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 16, 2019
Merged

Add blocks conflicting with ChainLocks to block index #2923

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ef315ca
Print hash of block which conflicts with a ChainLock
codablock May 14, 2019
d382482
Allow specifying custom block status in `AddToBlockIndex`
UdjinM6 May 14, 2019
f938f4d
Add blocks (headers) to block index even if they conflict with chainl…
UdjinM6 May 14, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Add blocks (headers) to block index even if they conflict with chainl… 
…ocks
  • Loading branch information
@UdjinM6 @codablock
UdjinM6 authored and codablock committed May 15, 2019
commit f938f4dd071d3ea4aed8ffbb826386bd30afea5f
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/chain.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ enum BlockStatus: uint32_t {
BLOCK_FAILED_VALID = 32, //!< stage after last reached validness failed
BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD = 64, //!< descends from failed block
BLOCK_FAILED_MASK = BLOCK_FAILED_VALID | BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD,

BLOCK_CONFLICT_CHAINLOCK = 128, //!< conflicts with chainlock system
};

/** The block chain is a tree shaped structure starting with the
Expand Down
10 changes: 9 additions & 1 deletion src/validation.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3473,17 +3473,25 @@ static bool AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state
if (mi == mapBlockIndex.end())
return state.DoS(10, error("%s: prev block not found", __func__), 0, "bad-prevblk");
pindexPrev = (*mi).second;
assert(pindexPrev);

if (pindexPrev->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK)
return state.DoS(100, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk");

assert(pindexPrev);
if (pindexPrev->nStatus & BLOCK_CONFLICT_CHAINLOCK)
// it's ok-ish, the other node is probably missing the latest chainlock
return state.DoS(10, error("%s: prev block %s conflicts with chainlock", __func__, block.hashPrevBlock.ToString()), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk-chainlock");

if (fCheckpointsEnabled && !CheckIndexAgainstCheckpoint(pindexPrev, state, chainparams, hash))
return error("%s: CheckIndexAgainstCheckpoint(): %s", __func__, state.GetRejectReason().c_str());

if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus(), pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime()))
return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));

if (llmq::chainLocksHandler->HasConflictingChainLock(pindexPrev->nHeight + 1, hash)) {
if (pindex == NULL) {
AddToBlockIndex(block, BLOCK_CONFLICT_CHAINLOCK);
}
return state.DoS(10, error("%s: header %s conflicts with chainlock", __func__, hash.ToString()), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-chainlock");
}
}
Expand Down