Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Bring Asterion's ability names in line with overhauled Makhleb #4247

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ahyangyi
Copy link
Contributor

@ahyangyi ahyangyi commented Jan 16, 2025

Asterion's current ability name, "Greater Servant of Makhleb", comes from Makhleb's old ability names before the 0.32 overhaul.

Since the overhaul was mostly merging the lesser/greater pairs while leaving the actual mechanics untouched, I think we can keep the existing monster spells (along with icons and descriptions), but use the new ability titles.

The other ability, "Major Destruction", is contrasted with another monster spell "Legendary Destruction". It is thus not changed in this PR.

@ahyangyi ahyangyi force-pushed the oneliner/asterion-abilities branch 2 times, most recently from 5e6b020 to 9d3fe50 Compare January 16, 2025 16:23
Asterion's current ability name, "Greater Servant of Makhleb", comes
from Makhleb's old ability names before the 0.32 overhaul.

Since the overhaul was mostly merging the lesser/greater pairs while
leaving the actual mechanics untouched, I think we can keep the
existing monster spells (along with icons and descriptions), but use
the new ability titles.

The other ability, "Major Destruction", is contrasted with another
monster spell "Legendary Destruction". It is thus not changed in this
PR.
@ahyangyi ahyangyi force-pushed the oneliner/asterion-abilities branch from 9d3fe50 to c2063c5 Compare January 16, 2025 16:23
@ahyangyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

BTW, please let me know if you think it's better to also rename Major Destruction here. I'm erring on the "safe" side for now but willing to change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant