Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aws: Refactor pagination test based on v1 port #97

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2018
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
aws: Refactor pagination test based on v1 port
  • Loading branch information
jasdel committed Jan 15, 2018
commit df379c06d250c9fa7080e57a464093dd40ba7b7b
205 changes: 73 additions & 132 deletions aws/request_pagination_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -513,152 +513,93 @@ func TestPaginationWithContextNilInput(t *testing.T) {

func TestPagination_Standalone(t *testing.T) {
type testPageInput struct {
NextToken string
NextToken *string
}
type testPageOutput struct {
Value string
Value *string
NextToken *string
}
type testCase struct {
Value, PrevToken, NextToken *string
}

expect := []struct {
Value, PrevToken, NextToken string
}{
{"FirstValue", "InitalToken", "FirstToken"},
{"SecondValue", "FirstToken", "SecondToken"},
{"ThirdValue", "SecondToken", ""},
}
input := testPageInput{
NextToken: expect[0].PrevToken,
}

c := awstesting.NewClient(unit.Config())
i := 0
p := aws.Pagination{
NewRequest: func() (*aws.Request, error) {
r := c.NewRequest(
&aws.Operation{
Name: "Operation",
Paginator: &aws.Paginator{
InputTokens: []string{"NextToken"},
OutputTokens: []string{"NextToken"},
},
},
&input, &testPageOutput{},
)
// Setup handlers for testing
r.Handlers.Clear()
r.Handlers.Build.PushBack(func(req *aws.Request) {
in := req.Params.(*testPageInput)
if e, a := expect[i].PrevToken, in.NextToken; e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect NextToken input %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
})
r.Handlers.Unmarshal.PushBack(func(req *aws.Request) {
out := &testPageOutput{
Value: expect[i].Value,
}
if len(expect[i].NextToken) > 0 {
out.NextToken = aws.String(expect[i].NextToken)
}
req.Data = out
})
return r, nil
cases := map[string][]testCase{
"nil NextToken": {
testCase{aws.String("FirstValue"), aws.String("InitalToken"), aws.String("FirstToken")},
testCase{aws.String("SecondValue"), aws.String("FirstToken"), aws.String("SecondToken")},
testCase{aws.String("ThirdValue"), aws.String("SecondToken"), nil},
},
"zero NextToken": {
testCase{aws.String("FirstValue"), aws.String("InitalToken"), aws.String("FirstToken")},
testCase{aws.String("SecondValue"), aws.String("FirstToken"), aws.String("SecondToken")},
testCase{aws.String("ThirdValue"), aws.String("SecondToken"), aws.String("")},
},
}

for p.Next() {
data := p.Page().(*testPageOutput)
for cName, c := range cases {
t.Run(cName, func(t *testing.T) {
input := testPageInput{
NextToken: c[0].PrevToken,
}

if e, a := expect[i].Value, data.Value; e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect Value to be %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
if e, a := expect[i].NextToken, aws.StringValue(data.NextToken); e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect NextToken to be %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
svc := awstesting.NewClient(unit.Config())
i := 0
p := aws.Pagination{
NewRequest: func() (*aws.Request, error) {
r := svc.NewRequest(
&aws.Operation{
Name: "Operation",
Paginator: &aws.Paginator{
InputTokens: []string{"NextToken"},
OutputTokens: []string{"NextToken"},
},
},
&input, &testPageOutput{},
)
// Setup handlers for testing
r.Handlers.Clear()
r.Handlers.Build.PushBack(func(req *aws.Request) {
if e, a := len(c), i+1; a > e {
Copy link
Contributor

@xibz xibz Jan 18, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this check seems weird. Wouldn't e always be greater than a? Obviously missing something as this test passes.

The first test case e would be three. Calling the first Next would result in i being 0. So would this check fail??

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check is to identify if too many requests have been made and fail the build, because i now is greater than the number of expected tests.

This could be simplified as just e, a := len(c), i; a == e Using equal instead of greater than would remove the need for the +1

t.Fatalf("expect no more than %d requests, got %d", e, a)
}
in := req.Params.(*testPageInput)
if e, a := aws.StringValue(c[i].PrevToken), aws.StringValue(in.NextToken); e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect NextToken input %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
})
r.Handlers.Unmarshal.PushBack(func(req *aws.Request) {
out := &testPageOutput{
Value: c[i].Value,
}
if c[i].NextToken != nil {
next := *c[i].NextToken
out.NextToken = aws.String(next)
}
req.Data = out
})
return r, nil
},
}

i++
}
if e, a := len(expect), i; e != a {
t.Errorf("expected to process %d pages, did %d", e, a)
}
if err := p.Err(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("%d, expected no error, got %v", i, err)
}
}
for p.Next() {
data := p.Page().(*testPageOutput)

func TestPagination_Standalone_Pointers(t *testing.T) {
type testPageInput struct {
NextToken *string
}
type testPageOutput struct {
Value *string
NextToken *string
}

expect := []struct {
Value, PrevToken, NextToken *string
}{
{aws.String("FirstValue"), aws.String("InitalToken"), aws.String("FirstToken")},
{aws.String("SecondValue"), aws.String("FirstToken"), aws.String("SecondToken")},
{aws.String("ThirdValue"), aws.String("SecondToken"), nil},
}
input := testPageInput{
NextToken: expect[0].PrevToken,
}

c := awstesting.NewClient(unit.Config())
i := 0
p := aws.Pagination{
NewRequest: func() (*aws.Request, error) {
r := c.NewRequest(
&aws.Operation{
Name: "Operation",
Paginator: &aws.Paginator{
InputTokens: []string{"NextToken"},
OutputTokens: []string{"NextToken"},
},
},
&input, &testPageOutput{},
)
// Setup handlers for testing
r.Handlers.Clear()
r.Handlers.Build.PushBack(func(req *aws.Request) {
in := req.Params.(*testPageInput)
if e, a := aws.StringValue(expect[i].PrevToken), aws.StringValue(in.NextToken); e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect NextToken input %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
})
r.Handlers.Unmarshal.PushBack(func(req *aws.Request) {
out := &testPageOutput{
Value: expect[i].Value,
if e, a := aws.StringValue(c[i].Value), aws.StringValue(data.Value); e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect Value to be %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
if expect[i].NextToken != nil {
next := *expect[i].NextToken
out.NextToken = aws.String(next)
if e, a := aws.StringValue(c[i].NextToken), aws.StringValue(data.NextToken); e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect NextToken to be %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
req.Data = out
})
return r, nil
},
}

for p.Next() {
data := p.Page().(*testPageOutput)

if e, a := expect[i].Value, data.Value; e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect Value to be %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}
if e, a := aws.StringValue(expect[i].NextToken), aws.StringValue(data.NextToken); e != a {
t.Errorf("%d, expect NextToken to be %q, got %q", i, e, a)
}

i++
}
if e, a := len(expect), i; e != a {
t.Errorf("expected to process %d pages, did %d", e, a)
}
if err := p.Err(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("%d, expected no error, got %v", i, err)
i++
}
if e, a := len(c), i; e != a {
t.Errorf("expected to process %d pages, did %d", e, a)
}
if err := p.Err(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("%d, expected no error, got %v", i, err)
}
})
}
}

Expand Down