This PR only contains repeated removal of with-ivy-window, so I assume it could potentially be treated as legally insignificant?

A regular series of repeated changes, such as renaming a symbol, is not legally significant even if the symbol has to be renamed in many places

One thing this PR does not cover is the outdated description of the usage of with-ivy-window in Section 7.3 of the user manual. But those changes would probably require the copyright assignment.

Its usage was subsequently replaced by (select-window (ivy--get-window ivy-last)) in 1c09e99.

Cross-referencing #639 and #665 for posterity.

Its usage was subsequently replaced by (select-window (ivy--get-window ivy-last)) in 1c09e99.

That commit says:

So now we use only the first part of `with-ivy-window', which
is (select-window (ivy--get-window ivy-last)).

But in fact, the first part of with-ivy-window is (select-window ... 'norecord), i.e. do not record this temporary window switch.

I'm inclined to bring back the norecord argument. Do you foresee any issues with that?

Either way, thanks for the careful analysis so far! As you can tell I'm still double checking the history and details of this part of the code.

This PR only contains repeated removal of with-ivy-window, so I assume it could potentially be treated as legally insignificant?

Yes, that's my understanding.

One thing this PR does not cover is the outdated description of the usage of with-ivy-window in Section 7.3 of the user manual.

I can take care of these changes...

But those changes would probably require the copyright assignment.

...unless you prefer to get started on the CA process?

This PR removes all with-ivy-window usages in actions in swiper.el

What about these two?

I'm inclined to bring back the norecord argument. Do you foresee any issues with that?

I don't see potential issues from my perspective. Maybe you can push a separate commit to this PR?

...unless you prefer to get started on the CA process?

I think I would avoid the lengthy paperwork unless absolutely necessary. So I will leave this part to you, thanks!

What about these two?

These were missed. Thanks for the quick review and I will update the PR.

This usage might still be necessary because of 3656dfe?

swiper/swiper.el

Lines 239 to 245 in 2a25a6f

	(ivy-exit-with-action
	(lambda (_)
	(with-ivy-window
	(move-beginning-of-line 1)
	(let ((inhibit-read-only t))
	(perform-replace from to
	t t nil))))))