The following feedback from Hunter highlights areas for improvement in our SRS. These changes aim to enhance clarity, formalize certain sections, and ensure traceability:

1. Glossary and Definitions:

   • Simplify and clarify definitions in the glossary section.
   • Define all terminology and acronyms explicitly (e.g., ReLU, LLM).
   • Provide a references section at the end to properly cite and cross-reference sources, avoiding informal citations like "@".

2. Grammar, Formatting, and Conciseness:

   • Address minor grammar and formatting issues throughout the document.
   • Ensure the writing is concise and avoids overly "flowery" language, especially in technical sections like "Current Situation."

3. Notation and Diagrams:

   • Define key notations and terminologies in diagrams and tables (e.g., specify the type of input for an n x m matrix).
   • Use correct mathematical notation and formalize critical sections, potentially leveraging discrete math, finite state machines, or Z notation.

4. Requirements and Traceability:

   • Illustrate relationships between requirements using diagrams or traceability tables.
   • Revisit Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) to ensure they are verifiable.

5. Rationales and Development Plan:

   • Expand on some requirement rationales for better clarity.
   • Include more details on how requirements will be prioritized and implemented in the development plan.

6. Citations and References:

   • Include a dedicated references section.
   • Improve citations for better accuracy and traceability.