Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(shared-data): add deck schema v6 #17250

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sfoster1
Copy link
Member

This schema contains a concept of "locating features" for addressable areas. These locating features are things that constrain the position of labware loaded on top of the addressable area. The presence of a locating feature indicates that the addressable area can contain deck items. Which locating feature is available constrains which labware can be loaded; different labware define different locatable features (for instance, their back left or front left corners, or the outer surface of one of their wells).

Locating feature names are not constrained to enums because we expect a fairly wide number of them.

To come out of draft

  • positions for modules that are not currently in

risk

low, because nothing should be using this (purposeful, will be followup prs)

Closes EXEC-80

This schema contains a concept of "locating features" for addressable
areas. These locating features are things that constrain the position of
labware loaded on top of the addressable area. The presence of a
locating feature indicates that the addressable area can contain deck
items. Which locating feature is available constrains which labware can
be loaded; different labware define different locatable features (for
instance, their back left or front left corners, or the outer surface of
one of their wells).

Locating feature names are not constrained to enums because we expect a
fairly wide number of them.

Closes EXEC-80
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested review from a team as code owners January 10, 2025 20:20
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested review from ncdiehl11 and removed request for a team January 10, 2025 20:20
@sfoster1 sfoster1 marked this pull request as draft January 10, 2025 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant