Thanks for the PR.

Is it similar to this one: https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/blob/master/modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/languages/K6ClientCodegen.java#L382 ?

@wing328 thanks for review!
k6 client you shared, tries to generate test cases. I'm not sure it useful for the most purposes. I suggest to generate API client library which uses k6 http implementation and leave a decision to a developer how to write tests.

@PertsevRoman I see. Thanks for the explanation.

cc @mostafa

Hey @PertsevRoman and @wing328,

Thanks for your contribution! Let me clarify a few points:

1. There is no such thing as K6s (or k6s). Unlike Kubernetes that is shortened to K8s, k6 is a shorthand for Kapablo, which is a load testing tool.
2. Generating tests from an OpenAPI specification is natural to k6. Although you can do functional testing with k6 or create HTTP requests to smoke test your API, but it is meant for testing, hence the generation of test scripts using the original OpenAPI-k6 integration (that I wrote).

With all that said, your contribution seems like an interesting use case, which generates a set of models and ready-to-use functions to write tests. I'd be happy to see a mix of the two with an optional argument to either generate the test or generate the models and API calls only.

CC: @javaducky @nicolevanderhoeven

Thanks for the PR but your commit (as shown in the Commits tab) is not linked to your Github account, which means this PR won't count as your contribution in https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/graphs/contributors.

Let me know if you need help fixing it.

Ref: https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/wiki/FAQ#how-can-i-update-commits-that-are-not-linked-to-my-github-account

My bad with email, it's not actual anymore. UPD: fixed

@mostafa thanks for review

1. you're right, there is no such things like k6s, k6 only; this is a mix of k6 and k8s in my head - sometimes it happens when you memorizing smth. wrong and then it became very hard to use right name.
2. I'll add the option; anyway, I'm not sure how can generated tests be useful due to generators knows nothing about target system scenarios; running a test which just iterating operations seems won't give a correct results