Skip to content

Issues: JuliaLang/julia

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
15 Open 36 Closed
15 Open 36 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

safer, more foolproof hash: make hash return an opaque value, and take that type as the second argument breaking This change will break code design Design of APIs or of the language itself hashing speculative Whether the change will be implemented is speculative
#57055 opened Jan 15, 2025 by nsajko
Add documentation to Set to clarify that types need hash defined to serve as elements of a Set, not just isequal. collections Data structures holding multiple items, e.g. sets docs This change adds or pertains to documentation equality Issues relating to equality relations: ==, ===, isequal hashing
#56020 opened Oct 7, 2024 by sadish-d
3
Convenient ways to define == and hash design Design of APIs or of the language itself equality Issues relating to equality relations: ==, ===, isequal feature Indicates new feature / enhancement requests hashing
#53565 opened Mar 2, 2024 by aplavin
2
incorrect hash for equal types, with Union instead of lower bound equality Issues relating to equality relations: ==, ===, isequal hashing types and dispatch Types, subtyping and method dispatch
#53109 opened Jan 29, 2024 by vtjnash
@vtjnash
2
hash(::Vector{<abstract type>}, ::UInt) allocates quite a bit due to type instability: why can't hash(::Any) infer UInt return type? hashing performance Must go faster stdlib Julia's standard library
#44244 opened Feb 18, 2022 by NHDaly
11
faster hash for specific types hashing
#43355 opened Dec 7, 2021 by goretkin
2
performance of multidimensional array hashing arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] hashing performance Must go faster
#41880 opened Aug 13, 2021 by michelangelo21
5
[WIP/RFC] broaden the scope of hash hashing
#37964 opened Oct 9, 2020 by rfourquet Loading…
4
randomize hash values per process hashing randomness Random number generation and the Random stdlib security System security concerns and vulnerabilities
#37166 opened Aug 23, 2020 by StefanKarpinski
5
hash_uint: simplify definitions hashing performance Must go faster
#36120 opened Jun 2, 2020 by StefanKarpinski Loading…
8
Adding comparison/hashing to Base.Some equality Issues relating to equality relations: ==, ===, isequal feature Indicates new feature / enhancement requests hashing
#35911 opened May 16, 2020 by schlichtanders
7
keys and hash don't work on ranges with many elements arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior hashing
#35603 opened Apr 26, 2020 by rfourquet
1
Equality and hash for self-referential recursive data-structures: Go Hopcroft? bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior equality Issues relating to equality relations: ==, ===, isequal hashing
#26020 opened Feb 12, 2018 by chethega
5
hash(x, h::UInt=zero(UInt)) => hash(x; h::UInt=zero(UInt)) ? design Design of APIs or of the language itself hashing keyword arguments f(x; keyword=arguments)
#26015 opened Feb 12, 2018 by StefanKarpinski
3
custom hashing is too easy to accidentally break collections Data structures holding multiple items, e.g. sets equality Issues relating to equality relations: ==, ===, isequal hashing
#12198 opened Jul 17, 2015 by StefanKarpinski
@StefanKarpinski
49
ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.