You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is really an inspiring idea to construct a series of mixup-like images to evaluate the reliability of various NR-IQA metrics.
Although the rationale is clear, I am still confused about how the "reliability" in Figure 4 is computed. Specifically, how do you measure/quantify the degree of a certain NR-IQA metric follows the monotonicity law? Is it the ratio of the samples in the dataset that totally follow the monotonicity through a certain NR-IQA metric, or some more well-defined scores?
Would appreciate it if you could share your ideas/code on that! (sorry if I miss it in the repository)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for sharing this great work!
It is really an inspiring idea to construct a series of mixup-like images to evaluate the reliability of various NR-IQA metrics.
Although the rationale is clear, I am still confused about how the "reliability" in Figure 4 is computed. Specifically, how do you measure/quantify the degree of a certain NR-IQA metric follows the monotonicity law? Is it the ratio of the samples in the dataset that totally follow the monotonicity through a certain NR-IQA metric, or some more well-defined scores?
Would appreciate it if you could share your ideas/code on that! (sorry if I miss it in the repository)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: