Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ssi): decoupling admission controller webhooks #33599

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

betterengineering
Copy link
Member

@betterengineering betterengineering commented Jan 30, 2025

What does this PR do?

Motivation

The short version is that we have three webooks that are tightly coupled, and they all rely on configuration for SSI. We're looking to substantially modify the SSI configuration in Kubernetes SSI | Workload Selection 🎯. Decoupling these webhooks is a necessary step to safely modifying the single step configuration. See Decoupling Admission Controller Webhooks for more details.

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

This commit migrates the injection filter into the mutate/common package
given it's used by multiple webhooks.
This commit moves config fetching out of the NewInjectorFIlter method
and instead requires it to be passed in.
BREAKING CHANGE: This commit updates the config webhook and the tags to
labels webhook to use their own configs when constructing their
injection filter. While there were no substantial changes to the tests,
this change could certainly have subtle consequences.
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/container-platform The Container Platform Team medium review PR review might take time labels Jan 30, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 78991f6b4f90368bb9b7d51816beb5dd16b89d4a

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 882.18MB 882.18MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 891.92MB 891.92MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 891.92MB 891.92MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 89.94MB 89.94MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 869.97MB 869.97MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 879.69MB 879.69MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 59.02MB 59.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 461.46MB 461.46MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 93.81MB 93.81MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 89.87MB 89.87MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.00MB 93.88MB 93.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse -0.00MB 93.88MB 93.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm -0.00MB 59.10MB 59.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse -0.00MB 59.10MB 59.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb -0.00MB 56.50MB 56.50MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=54594598 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 748d0b8

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 7bd96955-e743-4eda-9e15-da42dbea837a

Baseline: 78991f6
Comparison: 5ed5b03
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.56 [-2.50, +3.61] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.46 [+0.42, +0.50] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.40 [-0.07, +0.87] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.10 [+0.02, +0.17] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.07 [-0.81, +0.94] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.02] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.29, +0.28] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.65, +0.64] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.75, +0.74] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.84, +0.78] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.81, +0.75] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.04 [-0.84, +0.75] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.14 [-0.22, -0.07] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.34 [-1.13, +0.45] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.34 [-0.41, -0.27] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.38 [-1.27, +0.50] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

betterengineering and others added 2 commits January 31, 2025 10:14
Co-authored-by: Adel Haj Hassan <41540817+adel121@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds an injector interface and refactors the tagsfromlabels
and the config webhooks to use it. This will allow us to use the
injector logic without needing to instantiate a webhook.
@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels Jan 31, 2025
@betterengineering betterengineering changed the title fix(ssi): separate out usages of InjectionFilter fix(ssi): decoupling admission controller webhooks Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
long review PR is complex, plan time to review it team/container-platform The Container Platform Team team/injection-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants