-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ssi): decoupling admission controller webhooks #33599
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix(ssi): decoupling admission controller webhooks #33599
Conversation
This commit migrates the injection filter into the mutate/common package given it's used by multiple webhooks.
This commit moves config fetching out of the NewInjectorFIlter method and instead requires it to be passed in.
BREAKING CHANGE: This commit updates the config webhook and the tags to labels webhook to use their own configs when constructing their injection filter. While there were no substantial changes to the tests, this change could certainly have subtle consequences.
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=54594598 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 748d0b8 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 78991f6 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +0.56 | [-2.50, +3.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.46 | [+0.42, +0.50] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.40 | [-0.07, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.10 | [+0.02, +0.17] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.81, +0.94] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.29, +0.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.65, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.75, +0.74] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.84, +0.78] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.81, +0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.84, +0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.14 | [-0.22, -0.07] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.34 | [-1.13, +0.45] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.34 | [-0.41, -0.27] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.38 | [-1.27, +0.50] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Co-authored-by: Adel Haj Hassan <41540817+adel121@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds an injector interface and refactors the tagsfromlabels and the config webhooks to use it. This will allow us to use the injector logic without needing to instantiate a webhook.
What does this PR do?
Motivation
The short version is that we have three webooks that are tightly coupled, and they all rely on configuration for SSI. We're looking to substantially modify the SSI configuration in Kubernetes SSI | Workload Selection 🎯. Decoupling these webhooks is a necessary step to safely modifying the single step configuration. See Decoupling Admission Controller Webhooks for more details.
Describe how you validated your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes