Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HA Agent][NDMII-3313] Add ha_agent_metadata #33546

Open
wants to merge 26 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AlexandreYang
Copy link
Member

@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang commented Jan 29, 2025

What does this PR do?

Add ha_agent_metadata

Motivation

ha_agent_metadata is needed to show HA Agent related info in UI

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang changed the title Ndmii 3313 ha agent metadata3 NDMII-3313] ha agent metadata3 Jan 29, 2025
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang changed the title NDMII-3313] ha agent metadata3 [NDMII-3313] ha agent metadata3 Jan 29, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it team/agent-shared-components labels Jan 29, 2025
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang added this to the 7.64.0 milestone Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: afb4525
Comparison: ae5d840

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
agentlinuxarm64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
agentwindowsamd64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
agentdarwinamd64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
agentdarwinarm64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/metadata/haagent/impl

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor afb45257bea753d2e534ec9584bc1a3afe3fdee5

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.05MB ⚠️ 456.49MB 456.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.03MB ⚠️ 93.93MB 93.90MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.03MB ⚠️ 93.93MB 93.90MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.03MB ⚠️ 93.86MB 93.84MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.03MB ⚠️ 89.91MB 89.89MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.03MB ⚠️ 89.98MB 89.96MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.02MB ⚠️ 877.21MB 877.18MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.02MB ⚠️ 886.95MB 886.92MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.02MB ⚠️ 886.95MB 886.92MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.02MB ⚠️ 864.99MB 864.97MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.02MB ⚠️ 874.71MB 874.69MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 59.02MB 59.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 59.10MB 59.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 59.10MB 59.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.51MB 56.51MB 0.50MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=54654699 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit ae5d840

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: d3c11132-6846-4d0a-aa76-5fab08101459

Baseline: 77e59ac
Comparison: fa58605
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.76, +0.81] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.62, +0.65] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.75, +0.77] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.27, +0.28] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.03, +0.03] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.00 [-0.03, +0.03] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.85, +0.83] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.98, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.85, +0.70] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.08 [-0.92, +0.75] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.25 [-0.71, +0.22] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.48 [-0.55, -0.41] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.50 [-0.57, -0.43] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.62 [-0.72, -0.52] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.62 [-4.61, +1.38] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -1.72 [-2.61, -0.83] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang changed the title [NDMII-3313] ha agent metadata3 [HA Agent][NDMII-3313] ha agent metadata3 Jan 30, 2025
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang changed the title [HA Agent][NDMII-3313] ha agent metadata3 [HA Agent][NDMII-3313] Add ha_agent_metadata Jan 30, 2025
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Jan 30, 2025
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2025 14:33
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2025 14:33
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang force-pushed the NDMII-3313-ha-agent-metadata3 branch from bfb7066 to bfd81b6 Compare January 30, 2025 16:10
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang removed the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Member

@hush-hush hush-hush left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a few comments but it looks great overall 👍 (thanks for following all the latest guideline around status, flare, endpoints ...)

.github/CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/agent/subcommands/diagnose/command.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/agent/subcommands/diagnose/command.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/agent/subcommands/diagnose/command.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
comp/metadata/bundle.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
comp/metadata/inventoryhaagent/def/component.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
comp/metadata/inventoryhaagent/mock/mock.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
comp/metadata/inventoryhaagent/mock/mock.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
comp/metadata/inventoryhaagent/def/component.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang requested review from a team as code owners January 31, 2025 14:38
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-shared-components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants