-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reapply "[ASCII-2587] Migrating TraceAgent to use IPC cert" #32355
Reapply "[ASCII-2587] Migrating TraceAgent to use IPC cert" #32355
Conversation
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51608556 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit bda75e0 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 3763407 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +2.18 | [-1.09, +5.46] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +1.37 | [+0.64, +2.09] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.16 | [-0.73, +1.04] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.13 | [-0.34, +0.60] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.05 | [-0.08, +0.19] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.60, +0.69] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.88, +0.93] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.78, +0.80] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.85, +0.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.13, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.72, +0.68] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.82, +0.72] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.54 | [-0.62, -0.46] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.67 | [-0.73, -0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.94 | [-1.61, -0.26] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -1.50 | [-1.54, -1.47] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 9/10 | |
❌ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 9/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on --variable RUN_KMT_TESTS=on |
Devflow running:
|
…587-migrating-trace-agent-to-use-IPC-cert
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on --variable RUN_KMT_TESTS=on |
Devflow running:
|
…587-migrating-trace-agent-to-use-IPC-cert
…587-migrating-trace-agent-to-use-IPC-cert
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
Reverts #32320
The original PR was failing due to a failing e2e test (trying to connect to
http
and nothttps
)The first commit is the squash of the original PR (#31847).
The second commit is the fix for the failing e2e test.