-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(pkg_size): Delete old code and round the diff #32207
Conversation
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 51468064 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision |
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesAdded Jobscheck_pkg_sizecheck_pkg_size:
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/deb_x64$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES
needs:
- agent_deb-x64-a7
- iot_agent_deb-x64
- dogstatsd_deb-x64
- agent_heroku_deb-x64-a7
- agent_rpm-x64-a7
- iot_agent_rpm-x64
- dogstatsd_rpm-x64
- agent_suse-x64-a7
- dogstatsd_suse-x64
- iot_agent_suse-x64
- agent_deb-arm64-a7
- iot_agent_deb-arm64
- dogstatsd_deb-arm64
- agent_rpm-arm64-a7
- iot_agent_rpm-arm64
rules:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- when: on_success
script:
- GITHUB_KEY_B64=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP key_b64)
|| exit $?; export GITHUB_KEY_B64
- GITHUB_APP_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP app_id)
|| exit $?; export GITHUB_APP_ID
- GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP
installation_id) || exit $?; export GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID
- echo "Using agent GitHub App"
- inv package.check-size
stage: pkg_metrics
tags:
- arch:amd64 Removed Jobs
Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: fde3c5b Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.28 | [+0.24, +0.32] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.27 | [-0.20, +0.74] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.00, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.79, +0.88] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.61, +0.71] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.09, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.83, +0.85] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.74, +0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.85, +0.85] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.80, +0.73] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.11 | [-0.74, +0.52] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.12 | [-0.25, +0.00] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.24 | [-0.96, +0.49] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.49 | [-1.28, +0.30] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -1.00 | [-1.13, -0.88] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -1.15 | [-4.09, +1.79] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 9/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
pkg_size
methodMotivation
Concerning the report update, we are currently facing PR changing no code and reporting warnings because the package size diff is not 0.
This is due to 2 causes:
minimized-btfs.tar.xz
can vary because of metadata (timestamp)Describe how you validated your changes
Updated the unit tests associated
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
With this we hide small updates on the package size that could be caused by other origin than the 2 listed above. We have on-going threads to be able to get rid of these 2 constraints, so we will have to deactivate this rounding to be as precise as possible
Additional Notes