Vous avez du mal à améliorer les résultats d’un projet. Comment pouvez-vous appliquer le raisonnement syllogistique en tant que gestionnaire de programme ?

Using syllogistic reasoning helps ensure that decisions and improvements are logically aligned with overarching principles and specific project needs. 1. Identify Major Premise: Determine a broad principle related to project management (e.g., "Effective planning leads to successful project outcomes"). 2. Establish Minor Premise: Relate this principle to a specific aspect of your project (e.g., "This project lacks a detailed plan"). 3. Draw a Conclusion: Apply the principle to the specific case (e.g., "Therefore, improving planning will enhance the project outcome").

One example of syllogistic reasoning is (premise) )whenever any project issue is struggling to find solution then (conclusion) set up daily stand up meeting till team aligns on resolution actions. This logical relationship has helped me as well as PMs in my team to huddle up team everyday for stand up meetings. It also helps to understand if team needs any help and brings sense of urgency for issue resolution at hand.

Syllogistic reasoning, based on logical deduction, can help you enhance project outcomes as a program manager by breaking complex problems into clear, manageable steps. Start by identifying the premises that are driving the project's challenges. For example, if your premise is, "All successful projects have effective communication," and "This project lacks communication," the logical conclusion is that improving communication will boost success. Apply this logical framework to different aspects of the project, like resource allocation, risk management, or stakeholder engagement. By using syllogistic reasoning, you can make clearer, data-driven decisions that lead to better project results. 🔄

Testing your conclusions is crucial to ensure they’re based on solid premises. Validating whether your deductions hold up under scrutiny—like checking if training is genuinely lacking before assuming delays—prevents faulty reasoning and ensures more accurate decision-making.

To use syllogistic reasoning properly you must continuously test your conclusions so that you are not blinded by your desire to prove your arguments true, often called 'drinking your own Koolaide." Create Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that will allow you to objectively test your logic. A simple example of this is a teamwide velocity metric that is monitored at least every sprint. Example: The project requires that we complete 50 User Stories to meet the Minimum Lovable Product (MLP) for our next Go/No-Go meeting, our team completes 10 User Stories per sprint, therefore it will require 5 sprints to meet the MLP. If you record the velocity of the team every sprint you will know exactly when this logic problem is no longer true.

Identify Major Premises: Clearly define the overarching goals and objectives of your program. Identify the constraints and limitations that may impact project outcomes, such as budget, time, or resources. Establish Minor Premises: Break down the project into smaller, manageable activities or tasks. Determine the resources required for each activity, including personnel, equipment, and materials. Draw Conclusions: Use syllogistic reasoning to identify potential risks or challenges that may hinder progress. Evaluate and Adjust: Evaluate the assumptions underlying & If necessary, adjust your project strategy or tactics based on the conclusions drawn from your syllogistic reasoning.