Skip to main content

Offline tDCS modulates prefrontal-cortical–subcortical-cerebellar fear pathways in delayed fear extinction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied to enhance extinction-based treatments for anxiety disorders. However, the field shows conflicting results about its anxiolytic effect and only a few studies have observed the extinction of consolidated memories. We looked to study the effect of offline 1 mA tDCS over the right dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex across the fear pathways, in consolidated fear response during delayed extinction. Participants (N = 34 women) underwent in a two-day fear conditioning procedure. On day 1, participants were assigned to the control group (N = 18) or the tDCS group (N = 16) and went through a fear acquisition procedure. On day 2, the tDCS group received 20 min tDCS before extinction and while inside the MRI scanner. The control group completed the extinction procedure only. The tDCS session (for the tDCS group) and the fMRI scan (for both groups) were completed just on the second day. Univariate fMRI analysis showed stimulation-dependent activity during late extinction with the tDCS group showing decreased neural activity during the processing of threat cues (CS +) and increased activity during the processing of safety cues (CS −), in prefrontal, postcentral and paracentral regions, during late extinction. ROI to whole-brain psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis showed the tDCS effect on the connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex three cortical–amygdalo–hippocampal–cerebellar pathway clusters during the processing of the CS + in late extinction (TFCE corrected; p < 0.05). Increased neuronal activity during the processing of safety cues and stronger coupling during the processing of threat cues might be the mechanisms by which tDCS contributes to stimuli discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

In line with Open Science practices, fMRI, SCR and -Self-reports raw data, scripts for stimuli presentation, preprocessing and analysis may be found at https://osf.io/umy7c/.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Soares, M.J, Gerardo, B. for data collection and pre-processing. Georgette Agiris for her contribution in text/grammar review and insightful thoughts, and Professor Karl Friston for his wise advice in methodological choices and analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by a Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal and Programa COMPETE grant to AGA and JA [Grant numbers PTDC/MHC-PCN/3575/2012, SFRH/BD/80945/2011, PTDC/MHC-PAP/5618/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016836)]. The Psychology Research Centre of Minho University is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653]. The Cognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Coimbra is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement [UID/PSI/01662/2013].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AG-Á contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, software, formal analysis, visualization, supervision, verification, funding acquisition, project administration and writing––original draft preparation. RG was involved in investigation, software, formal analysis, data curation, and writing––reviewing and editing. DV contributed to software, formal analysis, and writing––reviewing and editing. ÓG was involved in conceptualization, methodology, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing––reviewing and editing. JA contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing––reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Ganho-Ávila.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The current study was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Coimbra.

Consent to participate

Participants gave their informed consent to participate according to the local ethical committee recommendations (compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki and GDPR recommendations).

Additional information

Communicated by Francesca Frassinetti.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2923 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganho-Ávila, A., Guiomar, R., Valério, D. et al. Offline tDCS modulates prefrontal-cortical–subcortical-cerebellar fear pathways in delayed fear extinction. Exp Brain Res 240, 221–235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06248-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06248-9

Keywords