Next Article in Journal
Lipophilic Compound-Mediated Gene Expression and Implication for Intervention in Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Related Diseases: Mini-review
Next Article in Special Issue
A Retrospective Investigation of Thiamin and Energy Intakes Following an Outbreak of Beriberi in the Gambia
Previous Article in Journal
Short-Term Effect of Prebiotics Administration on Stool Characteristics and Serum Cytokines Dynamics in Very Young Children with Acute Diarrhea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vitamin A–Not for Your Eyes Only: Requirement for Heart Formation Begins Early in Embryogenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 2
Issue 7
10.3390/nu2070693
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vitamin D and Bone Health; Potential Mechanisms

by
Eamon Laird
,
Mary Ward
,
Emeir McSorley
,
J.J. Strain
and
Julie Wallace
*
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2010, 2(7), 693-724; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2070693
Submission received: 5 June 2010 / Revised: 22 June 2010 / Accepted: 29 June 2010 / Published: 5 July 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers for Vitamins)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Osteoporosis is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and significant economic and health costs. Vitamin D is a secosteriod hormone essential for calcium absorption and bone mineralization which is positively associated with bone mineral density [BMD]. It is well-established that prolonged and severe vitamin D deficiency leads to rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. Sub-optimal vitamin D status has been reported in many populations but it is a particular concern in older people; thus there is clearly a need for effective strategies to optimise bone health. A number of recent studies have suggested that the role of vitamin D in preventing fractures may be via its mediating effects on muscle function (a defect in muscle function is one of the classical signs of rickets) and inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation can improve muscle strength which in turn contributes to a decrease in incidence of falls, one of the largest contributors to fracture incidence. Osteoporosis is often considered to be an inflammatory condition and pro-inflammatory cytokines have been associated with increased bone metabolism. The immunoregulatory mechanisms of vitamin D may thus modulate the effect of these cytokines on bone health and subsequent fracture risk. Vitamin D, therefore, may influence fracture risk via a number of different mechanisms.

1. Vitamin D Synthesis

For the majority of the population the principle source of vitamin D is synthesis following exposure of the skin to UVB radiation [290-315 nm] [1]. UVB radiation acts in the upper epidermis of the skin with 7-dehydrocholestrol converted to pre-vitamin D3 by photolysis of the B ring structure followed by isomerisation [1]. These structural modifications mean that the molecule no longer conforms within the plasma membrane and is ejected into the extra-cellular space and drawn into the capillary beds where it is bound by the vitamin D binding protein [DBP] and transported to the liver [1]. Maximal production of vitamin D is reached after 10-15 minutes of sun exposure in summer [2] depending on skin pigmentation [3] and during this period one erythaema dose is achieved which is the equivalent to an intake of over 500µg of vitamin D3 [4]. Further UVB exposure results in the formation of in-active photoproducts such as tachysterol and lumisterol that have negligible effects on calcium metabolism [4] and prevent vitamin D toxicity from sun exposure.
Geographical location is a key determinant of the efficiency of vitamin D synthesis as production is dependent on the angle of sunlight or the solar zenith angle [5]. As latitude increases, the amount of light within the wavelength range 290-315 nm to reach the earth’s surface decreases owing to an increased pathway of transversion and ozone absorption. Therefore, at locations above 35° latitude, the synthesis of vitamin D is seasonal with maximal amounts made during summer and little or no synthesis occurring during winter. Synthesis can also be affected by lifestyle, environmental, and physiological factors. Lifestyle factors such as the use of sun-screen, time spent outside and wearing of clothing significantly affect UVB exposure as do environmental factors such as pollution, cloud cover and ozone presence [6,7,8]. For example a sun protective factor [SPF] sunscreen of 15, if correctly applied, would decrease vitamin D synthesis to 1/15th or about 7% [6]. Also a recent cross-sectional study investigating the vitamin D status of 34 children [9-24 months old] living in a polluted area of Delhi reported that pollution reduced vitamin D serum concentrations by 50% [9]. Physiological differences such as skin complexion and age also affect synthesis: darker skin has significantly higher melanin content and subsequently requires a higher UVB exposure time than paler skin to synthesize an equivalent amount of vitamin D [10]. Increasing age is associated with a significant decrease in the amount of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin and thus, a reduction in vitamin D synthesis with studies reporting up to four times less cutaneous synthesis in adults aged over 70 years compared to a 20 year old adult [11].

2. Dietary Sources

Vitamin D is also obtained to a limited extent from the diet, albeit few dietary sources naturally contain the vitamin in sufficient quantities to make a significant contribution to requirements. The two main vitamin D secosteroids within the diet are vitamin D2 [ergocalciferol] and vitamin D3 [cholecalciferol]. Vitamin D2 is derived from plant and fungi and is produced through the irradiation of ergosterol. Vitamin D3, as previously mentioned, is produced from 7-dehydrocholesterol and is obtained in the diet from animal products with oily fish, fish oils, eggs and dairy produce providing the best dietary sources. A recent double blind, placebo controlled study reported that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two isomers [12]; however it is more often reported that vitamin D3 is the more effective. This higher effectiveness of vitamin D3 over D2 is owing to a possible increased affinity for the vitamin D binding protein [DBP] [13,14] leading to a reduction in clearance of D3 and providing longer lasting concentrations of 25(OH)D in the blood than D2 [14].
In relation to intakes, the composition of the habitual diet will impact on vitamin D status. For example, within Ireland the majority of vitamin D intakes are from sources such as meat and meat products [15] which contain low concentrations of the vitamin. Rich food sources such as oily fish are consumed infrequently. Few vitamin D fortified foods, aside from margarine, are available within Western Europe possibly owing to early adverse advent incidents of infantile hypercalcaemia attributed to over-fortification of dried milk with vitamin D [16]. Other countries, including the USA fortify foods; however, surveys have suggested significant differences between the actual and reported levels of fortification [17,18]. Vitamin D absorption occurs in the ileum and jejunum. It has been estimated that 75% is effectively absorbed [19] but efficiency is dependent on bile salt and micelle formation and, therefore, the presence of malabsorptive disorders such as Coeliac [20] or Crohn’s disease [21] can significantly affect absorption and thus status [22].

3. Vitamin D Metabolism and Function [Figure 1]

Vitamin D is bound by the DBP and transported to the liver [1]. Within the liver, the vitamin D is hydroxylated by 25-hydroxylase [CYP2R1] to the major circulating form of the hormone 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25[OH]D3] [23]. Excess non-hydroxylated vitamin D is stored in the liver, adipose tissue and muscle [24]. The 25[OH]D, bound to the DBP, is transported to the proximal tubule cells of kidney. The DBP is degraded and the 25[OH]D3 is hydroxylated by 1α-hydroxylase [CYP27B1] to the biologically active form of the hormone, 1,25 di-hydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25[OH]2D3] [calcitriol] [25]. The kidney however, is not the only source of CYP27B1: it has also been detected in tissues such as the colon, brain and pancreas suggesting different autocrine functions of the hormone [25]. Regulation of CYP27B1 within the renal tubules is controlled by fibroblast growth factor [FGF-23] and by parathyroid hormone [PTH]. PTH stimulates while FGF-23 inhibits 1α-hydroxylase production in the kidney through a series of feedbacks [23,24]. Once the hormone has been metabolized it is converted to calcitroic acid and excreted. The primary effect of vitamin D is enhanced calcium absorption in the small intestine [23,24,25]. With hypocalcaemia, increased PTH secretion stimulates production of 1,25[OH]2 D3 in the kidney [25]. The hormone interacts with the vitamin D receptor [VDR] in intestinal cells and complexes with the retinoic acid x receptor [RXR] in the nucleus [23,24]. This complex binds to the vitamin-D-responsive element [VDRE] of the calcium channel [TRPV6] which increases uptake of calcium into the cells and increases the absorption of calcium [24,25]. Secondly, within osteoblasts, vitamin D interacts with the VDR and increases the plasma membrane expression of the RANKL [Receptor Activator for Nuclear Factor κ B Ligand] [25]. RANK on preosteoclasts binds RANKL on the osteoblast which then converts the preosteoclast to an osteoclast [25]. This conversion releases chemicals such as hydrochloric acid to metabolise calcium stores from the bones into circulation to maintain the optimal physiological range [25].
Nutrients 02 00693 g001 1024
Figure 1. Summary diagram of vitamin D metabolism and function.
Figure 1. Summary diagram of vitamin D metabolism and function.
Nutrients 02 00693 g001

4. Vitamin D Intake and Status

Until recently, it was generally assumed that enough vitamin D was synthesized from sun exposure to meet requirements and no recommendations for dietary intakes for adults aged 18-65 yrs were set. However, research highlighting the effects of low vitamin D status [26,27] has indicated the importance of vitamin D in the diet. Within Ireland, the Food Safety Authority for Ireland [FSAI] has set a wide range of 0-10 μg/d (day) for adults [28] while in the UK there is no reference nutrient intake [RNI] for adults [18-64 yrs], only for those over 65 yrs [10 μg/d] and pregnant and lactating women [10 μg/d] [29]. In the US, adequate intakes [AI] are set at 5 μg/d [19-50 yrs] and 10 μg/d [51-70 yrs] [30] which also correspond with the WHO/FAO Expert Group recommended intakes [31].
The difficulty in assigning a RNI for vitamin D intake is exacerbated by the current lack of agreement on optimal vitamin D status. While vitamin D deficiency is generally accepted as a 25[OH]D3 serum concentration <25 nmol/L [32], the serum concentrations of 25[OH]D3 defining insufficiency, or optimal status are less clear. Insufficiency can be deemed as mild deficiency with a 25[OH]D3 serum concentration <50 nmol/L [33,34,35]. Over extended periods of time, insufficiency has been associated with increased bone loss and secondary hyperparathyroidism leading to increased fracture risk [36]. Sufficiency has been regarded as the point at which further intakes will have no additional beneficial effects on PTH and calcium metabolism in regard to bone health. However, the cut-off values for sufficiency are still under debate. Studies have demonstrated concentrations of >80 nmol/L [37] or higher, 100-200 nmol/L [35], as optimal.
As mentioned earlier, the dietary intake of vitamin D required to prevent vitamin D deficiency and ensure optimal vitamin D status will vary depending on sun exposure preferences. A recent study concluded that to maintain 25[OH]D >25 nmol/L in 97.5% of the population during wintertime the recommended dietary allowances [RDA] should be set at 8.7ug/d. However, the authors also calculated that a dietary intake of 12.1ug/d would be required to prevent deficiency among sun avoiders [38]. Such intakes are considerably higher than estimated vitamin D intakes in Ireland [3.3 µg] [39], the UK [4.2 µg] [40], the US [8.12 µg] [41] and other European countries [42,43,44].
Vitamin D toxicity is rare [45]. The symptoms include vomiting, nausea, constipation, weight loss, weakness and kidney stones with subsequent hypercalcaemia and ectopic calcification of soft tissue [46]. However, as discussed earlier, the formation of vitamin D from sunlight is a self-limiting reaction; thus preventing toxicity from sun exposure. Reports of toxicity have arisen from excessive dietary intakes of the vitamin [17,47,48,49] with all such cases reporting serum 25[OH]D concentrations >200 nmol/L. However, severe adverse effects have only been reported with extreme intakes of vitamin D of 15,000 µg/d [47,48] or 42,000 µg/d [49], well above any natural intakes from food or supplements from clinical trials.

5. Vitamin D and Bone Health

Peak bone mass is attained by the third decade of life [50] with genetics, physical activity, nutrition and lifestyle factors [51,52] playing key roles in the accumulation and maintenance of bone. Age related bone loss occurs around the fourth decade [53], resulting in a gradual decline of BMD though this process is accelerated in females during and up to 10 years post-menopause owing to possible oestrogen deficiency derived bone loss [54]. The development of bone disease in later life is related to the attainment of maximum peak bone mass and the maintenance of bone mass in adulthood [55]. In relation to vitamin D, research has shown that inadequate vitamin D intakes over long periods of time can lead to bone demineralization [56]. Vitamin D deficiency leads to decreased calcium absorption and ultimately the release of calcium from the bones in order to maintain circulating calcium concentrations [56]. Continuous bone turnover and resorption weakens the architecture of bones and increases fracture risk via secondary hyperparathyroidism [56] ultimately leading to the development of osteomalacia and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is clinically defined as a BMD 2.5 standard deviations below the mean of healthy young individuals [57,58].
There is a direct relationship between BMD and fracture risk [59], with a decrease in bone strength and density associated with an increased incidence rate of fractures [60].Fractures usually occur at the hip, spine and wrist [61] and not only carry considerable health costs, but can also result in increased mortality and a decreased quality of life [62,63,64]. Fracture incidence has been shown to increase with age [65]; therefore it has been imperative to develop preventive strategies in order to minimize the development of this condition. Given the relationship between vitamin D and bone mineralization, optimal vitamin D status is essential for minimization of fracture risk.

6. Fracture Risk

A number of studies have investigated the effects of vitamin D or vitamin D in combination with calcium on fracture incidence (Table 1,Table 2,Table 3). Three intervention trials of vitamin D alone [66,75,77] have reported a significant reduction in fracture occurrence. For example, one study [75] reported a 33% lower rate for fracture and a 22% lower rate for first fracture at any site compared to placebo in free-living individuals with 100,000 IU D3. While in another intervention [66], which supplemented with 150,000-300,000 IU D2, an apparent significant fracture reduction from baseline was reported, especially in the upper limb both in free-living and institutionalized subjects [though this study had no placebo and was not blinded]. Furthermore, in a trial [77] supplementing post-stroke elderly patients with 1000 IU D2, zero hip fractures were reported in the vitamin D arm (n = 48). These results are also supported by trials with vitamin D in combination with calcium. For example, in one study [89], supplementation with 400 IU D3 and calcium resulted in a reduction in the fracture incidence rate of community dwelling individuals. Furthermore, another trial [81] reported a significant reduction in hip fractures among institutionalized elderly females supplemented with calcium and vitamin D3 for two years. A subsequent analysis of the same cohort after 42 months supplementation indicated that hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures remained lower in the treatment group [94]. However, not all trials of vitamin D or vitamin D in combination with calcium have reported significant effects. For example, Lyons et al. [79] in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, supplemented nursing home residents with 100,000 I.U D2 quarterly for five years and reported no significant reduction in fractures. Moreover, in a much larger trial [92] of 36,000 subjects with 400 IU D3 & 500 mg calciumno significant reduction in fractures was reported. The difference in outcomes between trials is difficult to explain, albeit there are a number of possible explanations for lack of reported effects. A large number of trials [69,71,74,76,85,87,88,91,92,93] have supplemented with between 300-800 IU vitamin D which may not be enough to exert a beneficial effect according to a recent meta-analysis [95,96]. In addition, studies which have documented significant fracture reductions have reported that effects may be more evident among institutionalized elderly people compared to free-living individuals.
These observations are supported by a number of meta-analyses. Bischoff-Ferrari (2005) conducted a meta-analysis [97] of 7 RCTs and concluded vitamin D in the range of 700-800 IU/d reduced the risk of hip/non-vertebral fractures by 25% while a calcium intake of more than 700 mg/d was required for non-vertebral fracture prevention. In a separate analysis [98], an 18% reduction in hip fracture risk and a significant reduction in non-vertebral fractures were achieved with vitamin D and calcium supplementation. It has also been reported that vitamin D and calcium intervention is more effective in reducing the risk of hip fracture in patients in institutionalized care compared to free living individuals in the community [94,95] with more than 800 IU vitamin D and more than 1200 mg calcium daily required respectively to exert a beneficial effect. In keeping with this finding of a threshold effect of vitamin D, a more recent analysis [99] concluded that supplementation with 400 IU/d or less was ineffective while doses between 482-770 IU/d reduced fractures [hip 18%, non-vertebral 20%] with no further effect with additional calcium supplementation. Conversely, a recent Cochrane analysis concluded that vitamin D alone did not have a significant effect on fracture prevention and was only effective when combined with calcium in institutionalized individuals [100]. This finding is supported by a recent pooled analysis of over 68,000 patients which reported that 400-800 IU/d of vitamin D alone was not effective but 400 IU/d combined with calcium reduced the rate of hip fracture by 16% and reduced overall fractures by 8% [101]. Two meta-analyses to date [99,102] have looked at the effect of vitamin D analogues with one concluding that calcitriol & alfacalcidol were more effective at reducing fracture risk than D2 or D3 [102]. The use of such analogues, however, is not widely advocated at present given the potential risks and cost implications associated with them [99].
Taken together, the results from the meta-analyses support a cause and effect relationship between vitamin D in combination with calcium in the reduction of risk of vertebral and non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures. Several mechanisms may underlie this positive association between vitamin D and fracture risk including the well documented beneficial effects of vitamin D on bone mineral density.
Table
Table 1. Intervention with vitamin D on fracture prevention.
Table 1. Intervention with vitamin D on fracture prevention.
StudyStudy designnSexMean age [years]TreatmentLengthResults
CT, controlled trial;OSD, open study design trial; F, female; M, male; D3, cholecalciferol; D2, ergocalciferol; Ca, calcium;/d, daily; mths, months; yrly, yearly; IU, International units
Heikinheimo et al. 1992 (66)CT320M/F75-84150,000-300,000 IUD2 yrly5 yrsGroups with vitamin D had sig lower rate of fractures,
479M/F>85150,000-300,000 IU D2 yrly5 yrsparticularly upper limb but not lower limb fractures
Lips et al. 1996 (69)CT2578M/F80400 IU D3/d3.5 yrsNo effect
Peacock et al. 2000 (71)CT438M/F74800 IU D3/d4 yrsNo effect
Meyer et al. 2002 (74)CT1144M/F84400 IU D3/d2 yrsNo effect
Trivedi et al. 2003 (75)CT2686M/F75100 000 IU D3 four monthly 5 yrs33% lower rate for fracture at hip, forearm and vertebrae
Grant et al. 2005 (76)CT2675M/F77800 IU D3/d2 yrsNo effect
Sato et al. 2005(77)CT96F741, 000 IU D2/d2 yrsReduction in hip fracture
Law et al. 2006 (78)OSD3717M/F851,100 IU D2/d10 mthsNo effect
Lyons et al. 2006 (79)CT3440M/F84100 000 IU D2 four monthly3 yrsNo effect
Smith et al. 2007 (80)CT9440M/F79300 000 IU D2/d3 yrsNo effect
Table
Table 2. Interventionwith vitamin D plus calcium on fracture prevention.
Table 2. Interventionwith vitamin D plus calcium on fracture prevention.
StudyStudy designnSexMean age [years]TreatmentLengthResults
CT, controlled trial;OSD, open study design trial; F, female; M, male; D3, cholecalciferol; D2, ergocalciferol; Ca, calcium;/d, daily; yr, year; yrs, years
Chapuy et al. 1992 (81)CT3270F84800 IU D3 & 1200 mg Ca/d2 yrsHip fractures 43% & non-vertebral fractures 32% lower
Dawson Hughes et al. 1997 (84)CT389M/F71700 IU D3 & 500 mg Ca/d3 yrsReduction in non-vertebral fractures
Komulainen et al. 1999 (85)CT464F52300 IU D3 (100 IU in last yr) & 93 mg Ca/d5 yrsNoeffect
Chapuy et al. 2002 (87)CT583F85800 IU D3 & 1200 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effect
Harwood et al. 2004 (88)OSD76F82800 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d1 yrNo effect
Larsen et al. 2004 (89)CT9605M/F74400 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d3 yrs16% reduction in fracture risk
Flicker et al. 2005 (90)CT625M/F8310,000 IU D2 wk to 1000 IU/d& 600 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effect
Porthouse et al. 2005 (91)OSD3314F70800 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d25 mthsNo effect
Grant et al. 2005 (76)CT2638M/F77800 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effect
Jackson et al. 2006 (92)CT36282F62400 IU D3 & 500 mg Ca/d7 yrsNo effect
Pfeifer et al. 2009 (93)CT242M/F77800 IU D3/1000 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effect
Table
Table 3. Intervention with vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on fracture incidence.
Table 3. Intervention with vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on fracture incidence.
StudyStudy designnSexMean age (years)TreatmentLengthResults
CT, controlled trial; F, female; M, male; Cl, Calcitriol; Ac, Alfacalcidol; Ca, Calcium; /d, daily; wkly, weekly; yr, year;yrs, years
Vitamin D analogues
Hayashi et al. 1992 (67)CT740M/F7540 IU Ac/d1 yrLower fracture incidence
Tyliard et al. 1992 (68)CT622F6320 IU Cl/d3 yrsReduction in vertebral fractures
Sato et al. 1999 (70)CT86M/F7040 IU Ac/d2 yrs17.5% lower fracture rate
Ebeling et al. 2001 (72)CT41M57.520 IU Cl/d2 yrsNo effect
Gallagher et al. 2001 (73)CT489F7220 IU Cl/d2 yrsNo effect
Vitamin D analogues with calcium
Orimo et al. 1994 (82)CT80F7040 IU Ac & 300mg Ca/d1 yrDecreased vertebral fracture incidence
Shikari et al. 1996 (83)CT113F7030 IU Ac & 300mg Ca/d2 yrsDecreased incidence of fractures
Stempfle et al. 1999 (86)CT132M/F5010 IU Cl & 1000mg Ca/d3 yrsNo effect

7. Vitamin D and BMD

A number of cross-sectional studies have investigated the relationship between vitamin D status and BMD. For example, one study [103] of middle aged women reported that serum concentrations of 25[OH]D were positively related to bone density of the lumbar spine, neck and trochanteric regions of the femur. In addition, a more recent study [104] reported a positive association of vitamin D and BMD and suggested the effect may be even greater in the 90-100 nmol/L serum range of vitamin D. Given the observed relationship between vitamin D status and BMD, a large number of intervention studies have investigated the effects of vitamin D alone or vitamin D in combination with calcium on BMD (Table 4,Table 5, Table 6).
Vitamin D alone and in combination with calcium appears to have a clear significant effect on BMD. For example, 5 out of 9 studies of vitamin D alone [70,73,105,106,107], plus 16 of 22 studies [81,84,88,92,94,98,110,111,112,116,117,118,120,122] of vitamin D in combination with calcium have reported significant positive effects on BMD. For example, in supplementation with vitamin D alone, one study [107] reported a significant benefit after only five weeks in participants with impaired vitamin D status and osteoporosis/osteopenia. Supplementation with 100 000 IU D2 resulted in rapid improvement in vitamin D status and significant improvement in spinal and the femoral neck BMD. The findings are supported by another trial [106] of over 300 elderly mobile females in whom two years of vitamin D3 supplementation resulted in significant improvements in BMD. The improvements in BMD can also be seen in the trials with vitamin D and calcium. Over the last 20 years, 14 intervention studies examining the effect of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on BMD have been published. Overall, positive results have been reported, with doses more than 400 IU associated with significant effects on bone heath. However, the optimal dosage of vitamin D remains unclear. For example, two trials [117,120] which supplemented with 560 IU D3 & 1000 mg calcium/d [117] or 560 IU D3 and 500 mg Ca/d [120] reported increases in lumbar spine BMD while conversely; another trial [115] supplementing with 500 IU D3 and 1000 mg calcium/d over the same intervention period reported no significant effect. Four trials have reported significant increases in BMD with 700 IU [84,112] to 800 IU [81,88] D3 and calcium [500-1,200 mg]; however, in a study that supplemented African-American females with 800 IU D3 and 1,200-1,500mg of calcium [121] no significant effects were reported. The findings in African-American females could be explained, in part, by lower bone remodelling rates [124] and enhanced skeletal resistance to the effects of PTH [125] in this population group. Studies intervening with higher doses of vitamin D have also produced conflicting results.For example, one trial [120], supplementing with 1428 IU D2 and 1000 mg calcium/d reported no effect while another [123] supplementing 5000 IU D3/d with 320mg calcium reported significant effects. In the latter trial, 45 elderly participants were supplemented with vitamin D3 through bread fortification. An impressive 4% increase in spine and 23.4% in hip BMD were reported. Trials (Table 5) supplementing with vitamin D analogues have also reported significant improvements in BMD. For example, in one trial [73], 20 IU alone resulted in a significant increase in spine BMD. Trials [98,99,111,116,118,119] with vitamin D analogues and calcium have also reported consistent results with the majority reporting significant improvements in BMD [70,73,98,99,111,116,118,119].
Vitamin D alone and in combination with calcium appears to have a clear significant effect on BMD. For example, 5 out of 9 studies of vitamin D alone [70,73,105,106,107], plus 16 of 22 studies [81,84,88,92,94,98,110,111,112,116,117,118,120,122] of vitamin D in combination with calcium have reported significant positive effects on BMD. For example, in supplementation with vitamin D alone, one study [107] reported a significant benefit after only five weeks in participants with impaired vitamin D status and osteoporosis/osteopenia. Supplementation with 100 000 IU D2 resulted in rapid improvement in vitamin D status and significant improvement in spinal and the femoral neck BMD. The findings are supported by another trial [106] of over 300 elderly mobile females in whom two years of vitamin D3 supplementation resulted in significant improvements in BMD. The improvements in BMD can also be seen in the trials with vitamin D and calcium. Over the last 20 years, 14 intervention studies examining the effect of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on BMD have been published. Overall, positive results have been reported, with doses more than 400 IU associated with significant effects on bone heath. However, the optimal dosage of vitamin D remains unclear. For example, two trials [117,120] which supplemented with 560 IU D3 & 1000 mg calcium/d [117] or 560 IU D3 and 500 mg Ca/d [120] reported increases in lumbar spine BMD while conversely; another trial [115] supplementing with 500 IU D3 and 1000 mg calcium/d over the same intervention period reported no significant effect. Four trials have reported significant increases in BMD with 700 IU [84,112] to 800 IU [81,88] D3 and calcium [500-1,200 mg]; however, in a study that supplemented African-American females with 800 IU D3 and 1,200-1,500mg of calcium [121] no significant effects were reported. The findings in African-American females could be explained, in part, by lower bone remodelling rates [124] and enhanced skeletal resistance to the effects of PTH [125] in this population group. Studies intervening with higher doses of vitamin D have also produced conflicting results.For example, one trial [120], supplementing with 1428 IU D2 and 1000 mg calcium/d reported no effect while another [123] supplementing 5000 IU D3/d with 320mg calcium reported significant effects. In the latter trial, 45 elderly participants were supplemented with vitamin D3 through bread fortification. An impressive 4% increase in spine and 23.4% in hip BMD were reported. Trials (Table 5) supplementing with vitamin D analogues have also reported significant improvements in BMD. For example, in one trial [73], 20 IU alone resulted in a significant increase in spine BMD. Trials [98,99,111,116,118,119] with vitamin D analogues and calcium have also reported consistent results with the majority reporting significant improvements in BMD [70,73,98,99,111,116,118,119].
In summary, the majority of vitamin D supplementation trials demonstrate a positive effect of the vitamin on BMD and in de facto fracture incidence although further studies are required to confirm the optimal dose of vitamin D associated with these benefits. Moreover, although the potential benefits of vitamin D on fracture incidence may be at least partly attributed to beneficial effects on BMD, vitamin D may also impart advantages by reducing fracture occurrence through other mechanisms. One such mechanism is based on the potential of vitamin D to enhance muscle strength and thereby decrease the risk of falls.

8. Vitamin D and Muscle Strength

A recent review [126] concluded that falls were the biggest contributor to fractures and observational studies have reported that vitamin D deficiency is associated with muscle weakness [127] and an increased pre-disposition for falling [128]. Such associations are not surprising given that research has shown that the VDR is expressed in both skeletal muscle [129] and myoblast cells [130]. In vitro evidence has demonstrated that vitamin D can increase protein synthesis and cellular growth in muscle cells with an increase in size and number of type 2 muscle fibres [131] which are of particular importance as these are the first muscle fibres recruited when falling [132]. In support of these findings, a recent observational study [133] has reported vitamin D plasma concentrations in the range of 40-90nmol/L was associated with improved musculoskeletal function than serum concentrations <40nmol/L. Additionally, another study [134] has suggested that impaired muscle function in vitamin D deficient subjects could be present even before indications of bone disease have been recognised. Such evidence clearly provides a mechanism to support an improvement in muscle strength and in defacto bone health following vitamin D supplementation.
A number of intervention trials have investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on muscle with contrasting results. One of the earliest supplementation studies reported that 40 IU alfacalcidol administered over a period of between 3 and 6 months increased the size and number of type 2 muscle fibres [131]; however, a subsequent study using a lower dose [20 IU alfacalcidol] for three years reported no effect of supplementation on muscle strength [135]. In the later study, baseline vitamin D status was reported at 60nmol/L, potentially reducing any likely beneficial effect of supplementation. Furthermore, a single 300,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 failed to exert a beneficial effect in frail elderly individuals, even in those deficient in vitamin D [136]. In contrast, Sato et al. [77] reported that daily supplementation with 1000 IU vitamin D2 for two years produced a significant increase in type 2 muscle fibre diameter in hospitalized elderly females with post-stroke hemiplegia. More recently, two studies have reported significant associations with vitamin D and muscle strength [137,138] with one study reporting a significant association between vitamin D and lower extremity function. The observed beneficial effects of vitamin D on muscle could be explained by its modulating effects on PTH as hyperparathyroidism has been reported to induce muscle weakness and atrophy of type 2 muscle fibres in animal models [139]. The observations, in turn, could be explained by the promoting effects of PTH on pro-inflammatory cytokines [140], which are often considered co-factors for muscle wasting and disability, especially in older individuals [141]. For example, PTH has been shown to increase production of IL-6 in vivo [140], which has been linked with muscle weakness and bone resorption.
Table
Table 4. Intervention with vitamin D (with / without calcium) on bone mineral density (BMD).
Table 4. Intervention with vitamin D (with / without calcium) on bone mineral density (BMD).
StudyStudy designnSexMean age (years)TreatmentLengthResults
CT, controlled trial; SAD, single arm den; OSD, open study design; F, female; M, male; D3, cholecalciferol; D2, ergocalciferol; Ca, calcium;/d, daily; wkly, weekly; mths, months; Inc., increase yr, year; yrs, years *added calcium supplements to ensure intakes were 1200-1500 mg/d
Vitamin D
Nordin et al. 1985 (105) CT109F65-7415,000 IU D2 wkly2 yrsReduced rate of metacarpal cortical bone loss
Ooms et al. 1995 (106) CT348F80400 IU D3/d2 yrsInc. in BMD; femoral neck; 1.9% in left, 2.6% in right
Adams et al. 1999 (107) IT12F60100 000 IU D2/wkly5 weeksInc. in BMD; femoral neck (4.9%) & spine (4.1%)
Hunter et al. 2000 (108) CT128F58.7800 IU D3/d2 yrsNo effect
Peacock et al. 2000 (71)CT438M/F74800 IU D3/d4 yrsNo effect
Patel et al. 2001(109) CT70F47.2800 IU D3/d2 yrsNo effect
Vitamin D with calcium
Dawson Hughes et al. 1991(110)CT249F81400 IU D3 & 377 mg Ca/d1 yrReduced winter time bone loss/improved BMD of spine
Chapuy et al. 1992 (81)CT3270F84800 IU D3 & 1200 mg Ca/d2 yrsBMD of femur increased by 2.7% compared to placebo
Dawson Hughes et al. 1995 (112)CT247F63700 IU D3 & 500 mg Ca/d3 yrs1.5% inc. in BMD in femoral neck in 700 IU group only
Adachi et al. 1995 (113) CT62M/F647142 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d35mthsNo effect
Bernstein et al. 1996 (114) CT24M/F35250 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d1yrNo effect
Buckley et al. 1996 (115) CT66M/F52500 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effect
DawsonHughes et al. 1997 (84)CT389M/F71700 IU D3 & 500 mg Ca/d3 yrsInc. in BMD
Baeksgaard et al. 1998(117) CT240F62.5560 IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d2 yrs1.6% inc. in lumbar spine BMD
Komulainen et al. 1999 (85)RT464F52300 IU C/c/d (100IU D3/d 5th year) & 93 mg Ca/d5 yrsNo effect
Cooper et al. 2003(120) CT187F561,428 IU D2 & 1000 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effect
Meier et al. 2004 (121) OSD55M/F56500 IU D3 & 500 mg Ca/d2 yrs0.8 % inc. in lumbar spine BMD
Harwood et al. 2004 (88)OSD76F82800IU D3 & 1000 mg Ca/d1 yrChange in Hip BMD
Aloia et al. 2005 (122) CT280F50-75800 IU D3/d (2000IU after 2yrs)3 yrsNo effect
Jackson et al. 2006 (92)CT36282F62400 IU D3 & 500 mg Ca/d7 yrsChange in Hip BMD (+1.06% compared to placebo)
Mocanu et al. 2009 (123) SAD45M/F715000 IU D3/d & 320 mg Ca/d1 yr4% inc. lumbar spine & 23.4% inc. hip BMD
Table
Table 5. Intervention with vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on BMD.
Table 5. Intervention with vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on BMD.
StudyStudy designnSexMean age (years)TreatmentLengthResults
CT, controlled trial; F, female; M, male; Cl, Calcitriol; Ac, Alfacalcidol; Ca, Calcium;/d, daily; wkly, weekly;mths, months; yr, year; yrs, years
Vitamin D analogues
Sato et al. 1999 (70)CT86M/F7040 IU Ac/d2 yrsDecreased loss of BMD compared to placebo
Ebeling et al. 2001 (72)CT41M57.520 IU Cl/d2 yrsNo effect
Gallagher et al. 2001 (73)CT489F7220 IU Cl/d2 yrsIncrease in spine BMD
Vitamin D analogues with calcium
Sambrook et al. 1993 (111)CT103M/F4624 IU Cl & 1000 mg Ca/d1 yrReduced corticosteroid bone loss in the lumbar spine.
Orimo et al. 1994 (98)CT80F7040 IU Ac & 300 mg Ca/d1 yrIncrease in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD in 0.65%
Shikari et al. 1996 (99)CT113F7030 IU Ac & 300 mg Ca/d2 yrsIncrease in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD (1.81-2.32%)
Sato et al. 1997 (116) CT64M/F6840 IU Cl & 300 mg Ca/d6 mthsImprovement in BMD on intact side of stroke subjects
Lambrinoudaki et al. 1999 (118)CT81F3120 IU Cl & 1200 mg Ca/d2 yrsIncrease in BMD at lumbar spine
Stempfle et al. 1999 (86)CT132M/F5010 IU Cl & 1000 mg Ca/d3 yrsNo effect
Sambrook et al. 2000 (119) CT65M/F4620-30 IU Cc & 600 mg Ca/d2 yrsReduced bone loss in proximal femur
Therefore, though studies to date have been conflicting, vitamin D supplementation has the potential to positively benefit muscle function which could subsequently lead to a decreased propensity to fall and fracture.

9. Falls and Vitamin D

Given the potential for vitamin D to modulate muscle strength, it is perhaps not surprising that a large number of studies which have investigated the effects of intervention with vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium on risk of falls [Table 6, Table 7]. Of six trials that have supplemented with vitamin D alone, two [77,143] have reported significant reductions in fall rate following supplementation with vitamin D at 1000 or 800IU of vitamin D2/d respectively. Importantly, however, seven out of nine studies [89,144,145,146,147,148,149] that supplemented with vitamin D in combination with calcium have reported significant reductions in falls. Therefore, as with fracture prevention, vitamin D appears to be more effective in reducing the risk of falls when used in combination with calcium. Significantly, one meta-analysis of 5 RCTs [150] concluded that vitamin D reduced the risk of falling by 22% while another more recent meta-analysis [151] of eight RCTs concluded that supplementation with vitamin D in the region of 700-1,000 IU/d reduced falls by 19% with doses below this level ineffective. It has been suggested that vitamin D supplementation exerts greater effects on institutionalized versus free-living individuals [145], a finding which may be explained by a number of factors. Individuals in care typically have lower serum concentrations of vitamin D compared to free-living individuals [152] leaving them pre-disposed to muscle weakness and increased risk of falling and also more likely to benefit from supplementation. Furthermore, compliance with the supplementations regimen may be better among institutionalised individuals where supplements are provided by caregivers. Nevertheless, not all trials of institutionalized individuals have produced significant findings [78].
In summary, based on the evidence reported, vitamin D, particularly when supplemented with calcium, can have a beneficial effect on the prevention of falls and thus fractures.
Table
Table 6. Intervention with vitamin D or vitamin D analogues on falls.
Table 6. Intervention with vitamin D or vitamin D analogues on falls.
StudyStudy designnSexMean age (years)TreatmentDurationResults
CT, controlled trial; F, female; M, male; D3, cholecalciferol; D2, ergocalciferol;Ac, Alfacalcidol /d, daily; wkly, weekly; Ca, calcium;
Graafmans et al. 1996 (142)CT354M/F>70400 IU D3/d (2 yrs)7 mthsNo effect on falls
Sato et al. 1999 (70) CT86M/F7040 IU Ac/d2 yrsNo effect on falls
Latham et al. 2002 (136)CT243M/F79300,000 IU D3 once6 mthsNo effect on falls
Trivedi et al. 2003 (75) CT2686M/F75100,000 IU D3 quartley5 yrsNo effect on falls
Sato et al. 2005 (77)CT96F741,000 IU D2/d 2 yrs59% reduction in falls and increase in size/number type 2 muscle
Law et al. 2006 (78) OSD3717M/F851,100 IU D2/d10 mthsNoeffect
Broe et al. 2007 (143) CT124M/F89800 IU D2/d5 mths72% lower fall rate
Table
Table 7. Intervention with vitamin D or vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on falls.
Table 7. Intervention with vitamin D or vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on falls.
StudyStudy designnSexMean age (years)TreatmentDurationResults
CT, controlled trial; F, female; M, male; D3, cholecalciferol; D2, ergocalciferol;Ac, Alfacalcidol /d, daily; wkly, weekly; Ca, calcium;*changed to 1000 IU D2 daily with 600 mg calcium
DawsonHughes et al. 1997 (84)CT389M/F>65 700 IU D3/ 500 mg Ca/d3 yrsNo effect on falls
Pfeifer et al. 2000(144)CT148F70-86800 IU D3/1,200 mg Ca/d2 mthsReduced body sway (9%) and 1 yr follow up lower number of falls
Chapuy et al. 2002 (87) CT583F85800IU D3/1200 mg Ca/d2 yrsNo effects on falls
Larsen et al. 2002 (89)IT5771F74400 IU D3/1000 mg Ca/d3.5yrsReduced risk of severe falling by 12%
Bischoff et al. 2003 (145) CT122F>65800IU D3/1200 mg Ca/d12 wks49% reduction in falling and improved muscoskeletal function
Dukas et al. 2004(146) CT378M/F7540 IU Ac/d9 mthsReduction in falls only with Ca intake >512 mg/d in addition
Flicker et al. 2005 (147) CT625M/F8310,000 IU D2/wkly* 2 yrsReduction in incidence ratio for falls
Bischoff et al. 2006 (148) CT445M/F>65700 IU D3/500 mg Ca/d3 yrs46% reduction falls in womem (65% reduction in non-active women)
Pfeifer et al. 2009 (149) CT242M/F>70800 IU D3/1000mg Ca/d18 mths27% reduction in falls & 28% decrease in body sway

10. Bone Health, Vitamin D and Inflammation

Increasing age is not only associated with a decrease in BMD and muscle strength but is also associated with marked changes in immune and inflammatory responses. Studies conducted predominantly in individuals >70 y of age have demonstrated that, while the most striking age-related changes have been observed in the cell-mediated arm of the immune system, age-associated restructuring of the immune system is a consequence of alterations in virtually all of its components.These alterations result in the up-regulation of some components of the immune system as well as diminished function of others [153,154]. Changes include decreased mature lymphocyte function, decreased replication of hematopoietic cells [153] and an up-regulation in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 [IL-6] and tumour necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α] [154].
Inflammation is considered a characteristic of osteoporosis [155] and research has focused on the effects of cytokines on bone metabolism [156]. The cytokines IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α have been shown to regulate bone [157] and evidence from animal models has suggested that these cytokines are associated with the development of osteoporosis [154,155] through stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and subsequent bone resorption [158]. In vitro studies have indicated that TNF-α and IL-1 can stimulate human osteoclastic bone resorption [159], possibly owing to increased RANKL expression in a synergistic relationship; with TNF-α depending on the presence of IL-1 for optimal osteoclast formation [160].
To date, of the pro-inflammatory markers related to bone, the most studied is IL-6, the production of which can be stimulated by PTH [161]. However, findings from in vitro studies have been inconsistent, with reports that IL-6 stimulates both bone formation [162] and resorption [163]. Human studies have also produced inconsistent results on the relationship between IL-6 and bone health. A recent longitudinal study [164], reported that baseline IL-6 and change in IL-6 over a period of 2.9 years were consistently associated with bone loss in elderly adults. These findings are supported by a similar study in post-menopausal women [165]. Two other cross-sectional studies found no significant association between IL-6 and BMD [166,167] and another longitudinal study reported a positive association between IL-6 and bone loss in the lumbar spine [168]. The associations between other cytokines and bone health have also been assessed; TNF-α is associated with bone resorption [169], as is IL-17, which is reported to act synergistically with TNF-α to promote bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis patients [170]. Conversely, some animal studies have suggested that IL-17 is protective in oestrogen-derived bone loss which commonly occurs during the menopause [171].
The relationship between polymorphisms in cytokine genes, which alter expression of the particular cytokine, and bone health has been investigated with varying results. Polymorphisms in the IL-1 receptor antagonist [IL-1ra] gene in post-menopausal women have been associated with lower BMD and increased fracture risk [172,173]; however, such associations with this polymorphism are not evident in all trials [174]. Other polymorphisms that have been identified include the 174 GG polymorphism in IL-6; this polymorphism results in a higher expression of IL-6 protein and has been associated with increased bone resorption [175]. This particular polymorphism has also been reported as a potential risk factor for hip fracture among late postmenopausal women without oestrogen replacement therapy and those with inadequate calcium intakes [176]. Studies have also indicated that polymorphisms in the TNFRSF1B gene, which codes for a TNF receptor, also contain polymorphisms which show associations with BMD [177,178]. This relationship between bone and cytokines is further strengthened by another study which reported that a polymorphism in transforming growth factor [TGF]-β1 is associated with increased bone mass and is less common in individuals with osteoporotic fractures [173].
Evidence from both epidemiological and observational studies has highlighted the immunoregulatory effects of vitamin D; research suggesting a potential role for the vitamin in the management of immunological disorders such as multiple sclerosis [179] and rheumatoid arthritis [180]. The VDR are located in of a variety of immune cells, including monocytes and macrophages [181]. Following binding of 1,25 [OH]2D to the VDR, monocyte and macrophage activity is up regulated enhancing the host defences and an immunosuppressive effect is observed in lymphocytes decreasing the activity of T and B cells [182]. A number of studies have reported that vitamin D, in the form of 1,25[OH]2D3, can down regulate cytokine production. For example, in vitro studies have reported a significant decrease in IL-6 and TNF-α with vitamin D [183,184]. In vivo studies have also reported positive associations. For example, Zhu et al [185] investigated an animal model of inflammatory bowel disease and reported that vitamin D, in the form of 1,25[OH]2D, downgraded the production of TNF-α. This finding is supported by other studies investigating clinical populations which have reported positive effects of vitamin D supplementation on cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure [186] and multiple sclerosis [187]. Moreover, in relation to bone health, one study has investigated the potential of vitamin D to alter cytokine production in individuals at increased risk of fracture and concluded that 20 IU/day of calcitriol for 6 months decreased both IL-1 and TNF-α concentrations and increased BMD in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis [188].
In summary, while not assessed in the majority of vitamin D intervention studies to date, it is possible given the immunoregulatory effects of vitamin D together with the reported inflammatory aetiology of osteoporosis, that the beneficial effects of vitamin D on fracture risk may be mediated, at least in part, by an effect of vitamin D on cytokine concentration. Clearly there is a need for more studies, both observational and intervention studies, to determine whether vitamin D status favourably modulates bone health through an effect on the immune and inflammatory systems.

11. Conclusions

It is clear that vitamin D is essential for bone health; with insufficient intakes resulting not only in the classical deficiency diseases of rickets and osteomalacia but also in increased bone metabolism and enhanced fracture risk. With evidence accumulating of inadequate vitamin D status in many countries worldwide and particularly in older people, who represent an ever increasing section of the population, maintaining bone health and decreasing fracture risk is set to become an even greater economic and social challenge over the coming decades. The evidence from research findings to-date indicates that supplementation with vitamin D in those most at-risk of impaired bone health (immobile or institutionalized elderly) has a beneficial effect on fracture prevention. Research clearly suggests vitamin D not only improves BMD but also enhances muscle function leading to a decreased number of falls and has the potential to modulate the effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines on bone metabolism. The level of supplementation required for an optimal effect on fracture prevention, however, is still under debate with multiple studies indicating different dosage regimens. The majority of trials and meta-analyses indicate that a dose of vitamin D of 800 IU/d in combination with a sufficient intake of calcium is optimal, albeit some studies suggest an even greater benefit at higher intakes. Further studies are required to confirm the optimal dose of vitamin D required to reduce fracture risk in older people. In addition, further research is warranted in order to explore the emerging and potentially exciting effect of vitamin D on pro-inflammatory cytokines and bone health.

References

  1. Holick, M.F. Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nut. 2004, 80, 1678S–1688S. [Google Scholar]
  2. Diamond, T.H.; Eisman, J.A.; Mason, R.S.; Nowson, C.A.; Pasco, J.A.; Sambrook, P.N; Wark, J.D. Vitamin D and adult bone health in Australia and New Zealand:a position statement. MJA 2005, 182, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Holick, M.F. McCollum Award Lecture, Vitamin D: New Horizons for the 21st Century. Am. J. Clin. Nut. 1994, 60, 619–630. [Google Scholar]
  4. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D: a millennium perspective. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 88, 296–307. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, T. Factors that affect the cutaneous synthesis and dietary sources of vitamin D. Arch. Biochem. Biophysics 2007, 460, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  6. Matsuoka, L.Y.; Ide, L.; Wortsman, J.; MacLaughlin, J.A.; Holick, M.F. Sunscreens suppress vitamin D3 synthesis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 64, 1165–1168. [Google Scholar]
  7. Holick, M.F. Environmental factors that influence the cutaneous production of vitamin D. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 61, 638S–645S. [Google Scholar]
  8. Josefsson, W.; Landelius, T. Effects of clouds on UV irradiance as estimated from cloud amount, cloud type, precipitation, global radiation and sunshine duration. J. Geo. Research. 2000, 105, 4927–4935. [Google Scholar]
  9. Agarwal, K.S.; Mughal, M.Z.; Upadhyay, P.; Berry, J.L.; Mawer, E.B.; Puliyel, J.M. The impact of atmospheric pollution on vitamin D status of infants and toddlers in Delhi, India. Arch. Dis. Child. 2002, 87, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Matsuoka, L.Y.; Wortsman, J.; Haddad, J.G.; Kolm, P.; Hollis, B.W. Racial pigmentation and the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D. Arch. Dermatol. 1991, 127, 536–538. [Google Scholar]
  11. MacLaughlin, J.; Holick, M.F. Aging decreases the capacity of human skin to produce vitamin D3. J. Clin. Invest. 1985, 76, 1536–1538. [Google Scholar]
  12. Holick, M.F.; Biancuzzo, R.M.; Chen, T.C.; Klein, E.K.; Young, A.; Douglass, B.; Reitz, R.; Salameh, W.; Ameri, A.; Tannenbaum, A.D. Vitamin D2 is as effective as Vitamin D3 in maintaining circulating concentrations of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D status. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Trang, H.M.; Cole, D.E.; Rubin, L.A.; Pierratos, A.; Siu, S.; Vieth, R. Evidence that vitamin D3 increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D more efficiently than does vitamin D2. Am. J. Clin. Nut. 1998, 68, 854–858. [Google Scholar]
  14. Armas, L.A.; Hollis, B.W.; Heaney, R.P. Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 5387–5391. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill, T.R.; O’Brien, M.M.; Cashman, K.D.; Flynn, A.; Kiely, M. Vitamin D intakes in 18-64 year old Irish adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nut. 2004, 58, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. British Paediatric Association. Hypercalcaemia in infants and vitamin D. BMJ 1956, 2, 149. [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, T.C.; Heath, H.; Holick, M.F. An update on the vitamin D content of fortified milk from the United States and Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1507. [Google Scholar]
  18. Calvo, M.S.; Whiting, S.J.; Barton, C.N. Vitamin D fortification in the United States and Canada: current status and data needs. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 1710S–1716S. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bikle, D. Vitamin D Insufficiency/Deficiency in Gastrointestinal Disorders. J. Bone. Min. Res. 2007, 22, 2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Avioii, L.V. Absorption and metabolism of vitamin D3 in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1969, 22, 437–446. [Google Scholar]
  21. Driscoll, R.H.; Meredith, S.C.; Sitrin, M.; Rosenberg, I.H. Vitamin D deficiency and bone disease in patients with Crohns disease. Gastroenterology 1982, 83, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sitrin, M.D.; Pollack, K.L.; Bolt, M.G.; Rosenberg, I.H. Comparison of vitamin D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D absorption in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1982, 242, G326. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bouillon, R. Vitamin D: from photosynthesis, metabolism, and action to clinical applications. In Endocrinology, 3rd; De Groot, L., Jameson, J.L., Burger, H.G., Eds.; Saunders: Philadelphia, USA, 2001; pp. 1009–1028. [Google Scholar]
  24. Holick, M.F. Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 2062–2072. [Google Scholar]
  25. Khosla, S. The OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 5050–5055. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zittermann, A.; Schleithoff, S.S.; Tenderich, G.; Berthold, H.K.; Korfre, R.; Stehle, P. Low vitamin D status: a contributing factorin the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003, 41, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266–281. [Google Scholar]
  28. Food Safety Authority of Ireland, [1999]: Recommended Dietary Allowances for Ireland; Government Publications Sales Office: Dublin, Ireland, 1999.
  29. Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. In Report 41. Report of the Panel on Dietary Reference Values of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy; HMSO: London, UK, 1997.
  30. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Vitamin D and Fluoride; National Academy: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  31. FAO/World Health Organization, Human vitamin and mineral requirements: a report of the joint FAO/WHO expert consultation, Bangkok, Thailand; Food and Nutrition Division: Rome, Italy, 1996.
  32. UK Department of Health, Nutrition and bone health: with particular reference to calcium and vitamin D. Report on Health and Social subjects; The Stationary Office: London, United Kingdom, 1998.
  33. McKenna, M.; Freaney, R.; Meade, A.; Muldowney, F. Hypovitaminosis D and elevated serum alkaline phosphatase in elderly Irish people. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985, 41, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  34. McKenna, M.; Freaney, R. Secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: means to defining hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos. Int. 1998, 8, S3–S6. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zittermann, A.; Scheld, K.; Stehle, P. Seasonal variations in vitamin D status and calcium absorption do not influence bone turnover in young women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 52, 501–506. [Google Scholar]
  36. Van der Wielen, R.P.; Lowik, M.R.; Van den Berg, H.; De Groot, LC.; Haller, J.; Moreiras, O.; van Staveren, W.A. Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet 1995, 346, 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  37. McKenna, M. Differences in vitamin D status between countries in young adults and elderly. Am. J. Med. 1992, 93, 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cashman, K.D.; Hill, T.R.; Lucey, A.J.; Taylor, N.; Seamans, K.M.; Muldowney, S.; Fitzgerald, A.P.; Flynn, A.; Barnes, M.S.; Horigan, G. Estimation of the dietary requirement for vitamin D in healthy adults. Am. J. Clinl. Nut. 2008, 88, 1535–1542. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hill, T.R.; O’Brien, M.M.; Cashman, K.D.; Flynn, A.; Kiely, M. Vitamin D intakes in 18-64 year old Irish adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nut. 2004, 58, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar]
  40. Henderson, L.; Irving, K.; Gregory, J.; Bates, C.J.; Prentice, A.; Perks, J.; Swan, G.; Farron, M. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years-vitamin and mineral intake and urinary analysis. Volume 3; HMSO: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  41. Park, Y.K.; Barton, C.N.; Calvo, M.S. Dietary contributions to serum 25 [OH] vitamin D levels [25[OH] D] differ in black and white adults in the United States: Results from NHANES III. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16, F281. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rasmussen, L.B.; Hansen, G.L.; Hansen, E.; Koch, B.; Mosekilde, L.; Mølgaard, C.; Sørensen, O.H.; Ovesen, L. Vitamin D: should the supply in the Danish population be increased? Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2001, 51, 209–215. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ovesen, L.; Andersen, R.; Jakobsen, J. Geographical differences in vitamin D status, with particular reference to European countries. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 813–821. [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Der Wielen, R.P.J.; Lowik, M.R.H.; Van Den Berg, H.; De Groot, L.; Haller, J.; Moreiras, O.; Van Staveren, W.A. Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet. 1995, 346, 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  45. Barnes, M.S.; Robson, J.P.; Bonham, M.P.; Strain, J.; Wallace, J. Vitamin D: Status, Supplementation and Immunodulation. Cur. Nut. Food. Sci. 2006, 2, 315–336. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vieth, R.; Chan, P.; MacFarlane, G. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Todd, M.A.; Bailey, R.R.; Espiner, E.A.; Lynn, K.L. Vitamin D2 for the treatment of chilblains-a cautionary tale. N Z. Med. J. 1987, 100, 465. [Google Scholar]
  48. Barrueto F., Jr.; Wang-Flores, H.H.; Howland, M.A.; Hoffman, R.S.; Nelson, L.S. Acute vitamin D intoxication in a child. Pediatrics 2005, 116, E453–456. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vieth, R.; Pinto, T.R.; Reen, B.S.; Wong, M.M. Vitamin D poisoning by table sugar. Lancet 2002, 359–672. [Google Scholar]
  50. Matkovic, V.; Jelic, T.; Wardlaw, G.M.; Ilich, J.Z.; Goel, P.K.; Wright, J.K.; Andon, M.B.; Smith, K.T.; Heaney, R.P. Timing of peak bone mass in Caucasian females and its implication for the prevention of osteoporosis. J. Clin. Invest. 1994, 93, 799–808. [Google Scholar]
  51. Heaney, R.P.; Abrams, S.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Looker, A.; Marcus, R.; Matkovic, V.; Weaver, C. Peak bone mass Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11, 985–1009. [Google Scholar]
  52. Seeman, E. The effects of tobacco and alcohol use on bone. In Osteoporosis, 1st; Marcus, R., Feldman, D., Kelsey, J., Eds.; Calif Academic Press Inc: San Diego, USA, 1996; pp. 577–598. [Google Scholar]
  53. Emaus, N.; Berntsen, G.K.; Joakimsen, R.M.; V, Fønnebø. Longitudinal changes in forearm bone mineral density in women and men aged 25-44 years: the Tromsø Study: a population-based study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 162, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Weitzmann, N.M.; Pacifici, R. Estrogen deficiency and bone loss: an inflammatory tale. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 1186–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Slemenda, C.W.; Hui, S.L.; Longcope, C.; Wellman, H.; Johnston, C.C., Jr. Predictors of bone mass in perimenopausal women. Ann. Intern. Med. 1990, 112, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lips, P. Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocrinology. Rev. 2001, 22, 477–501. [Google Scholar]
  57. World Health Organisation, Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. In Technical Report Series 843.; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 1994.
  58. Binkley, N.C.; Schmeer, P.; Wasnich, R.D.; Lenchik, L. What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians? J. Clin. Densitom. 2002, 5, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Cummings, S.R.; Black, D.M.; Nevitt, M.C.; Browner, W.; Cauley, J.; Ensrud, K.; Genant, H.K.; Palermo, L.; Scott, J.; Vogt, T.M. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 1993, 341, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Marshall, D.; Johnell, O.; Wedel, H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996, 312, 1254–1259. [Google Scholar]
  61. Delmas, P.D.; Marin, F.; Marcus, R.; Misurski, D.A.; Mitlak, B.H. Beyond Hip: Importance of Other Nonspinal Fractures. Am. J. Med. 2007, 120, 381–387. [Google Scholar]
  62. Haentjens, P.; Autier, P.; Barette, M.; Boonen, S. The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women. A one year prospective, observational cohort study with matched pair analysis. Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. J. Bone. Joint. Surg. Am. Ed. 2001, 83, 493–500. [Google Scholar]
  63. Cooper, C. The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am. J. Med. 1997, 103, 12S–17S. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cauley, J.A.; Thompson, D.E.; Ensrud, K.C.; Scott, J.C.; Black, D. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteo.Intern. 2000, 11, 556–561. [Google Scholar]
  65. Melton, L.J. Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow. Bone 1993, 14, S1–8. [Google Scholar]
  66. Heikinheimo, R.J.; Inkovaara, J.A.; Harju, E.J.; Haavisto, M.V.; Kaarela, R.H.; Kataja, J.M.; Kokko, A.L.; Kolho, L.A.; Rajala, S.A. Annual injection of vitamin D and fractures of aged bones. Calcified. Tissue. Int. 1992, 51, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hayashi, Y.; Fujita, T.; Inoue, T. Decrease of vertebral fracture in osteoporosis by administration of 1a-hydroxyvitamin D3. J. Bone. Min. Res. 1992, 10, 184–188. [Google Scholar]
  68. Tilyard, M.W.; Spears, G.F.S.; Thomson, J.; Dovey, S. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with calcitriol and calcium. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 326, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lips, P.; Graafmans, W.C.; Ooms, M.E.; Bezemer, P.D.; Bouter, L.M. Vitamin D supplementation and fracture incidence in elderly persons. Ann. Intern. Med. 1996, 124, 400–406. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sato, Y.; Manabe, S.; Kuno, H.; Oizumi, K. Amelioration of osteopenia and hypovitaminosis D by 1a-hydroxyvitamin D3 in elderly patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999, 66, 64–68. [Google Scholar]
  71. Peacock, M.; Liu, G.; Carey, M.; McClintock, R.; Ambrosius, W.; Hui, S.; Johnston, C.C. Effect of calcium or 25OH vitamin D3 dietary supplementation on bone loss at the hip in men and women over the age of 60. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 3011–3019. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ebeling, P.R.; Wark, J.D.; Yeung, S.; Poon, C.; Salehi, N.; Nicholson, G.C.; Kotowicz, M.A. Effects of calcitriol or calcium on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and fractures in men with primary osteoporosis: a two-years randomized, double blind, double placebo study. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 2001, 86, 4096–4103. [Google Scholar]
  73. Gallagher, J.C.; Fowler, S.E.; Detter, J.R.; Sherman, S.S. Combination treatment with estrogen and calcitriol in the prevention of age-related bone loss. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 3618–3628. [Google Scholar]
  74. Meyer, H.E.; Smedshaug, G.B.; Kvaavik, E.; Falch, J.A.; Tverdal, A.; Pedersen, J.I. Can vitamin D supplementation reduce the risk of fracture in the elderly? A randomized controlled trial. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2002, 17, 709–715. [Google Scholar]
  75. Trivedi, D.P.; Doll, R.; Khaw, K.T. Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 [cholecalciferol] supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ 2003, 326, 469. [Google Scholar]
  76. Grant, A.M.; Avenell, A.; Campbell, M.K.; Cooper, C.; Donaldson, C.; Francis, R.M.; Gillespie, W.J.; Robinson, C.M.; Torgerson, D.J. Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or Vitamin D, RECORD): a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 365, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar]
  77. Sato, Y.; Iwamoto, J.; Kanoko, T.; Satoh, K. Low-Dose Vitamin D Prevents Muscular Atrophy and Reduces Falls and Hip Fractures in Women after Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2005, 20, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
  78. Law, M.; Withers, H.; Morris, J.; Anderson, F. Vitamin D supplementation and the prevention of fractures and falls: results of a randomised trial in elderly people in residential accommodation. Age Ageing 2006, 35, 482–486. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lyons, R.A.; Johansen, A.; Brophy, S.; Newcombe, R.; Phillips, C.; Lervy, B.; Evans, R.; Wareham, K.; Stone, M. Preventing fractures among older people living in institutional care: a pragmatic randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation. Osteoporos. Int. 2007, 18, 811–818. [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith, H.; Anderson, F.; Raphael, H.; Maslin, P.; Crozier, S.; Cooper, C. Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women-a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology 2007, 46, 1852–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Chapuy, M.C.; Arlot, M.E.; Duboeuf, F.; Brun, J.; Crouzet, B.; Arnaud, S.; Delmas, P.D.; Meunier, P.J. Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in elderly women. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 327, 1637–1642. [Google Scholar]
  82. Orimo, H.; Shiraki, M.; Hayashi, Y.; Hoshino, T.; Onaya, T. Effects of 1a-hydroxyvitamin D3 on lumbar bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif. Tissue. Int. 1994, 54, 370–376. [Google Scholar]
  83. Shiraki, M.; Kushida, K.; Yamazaki, K.; Nagai, T.; Inoue, T.; Orimo, H. Effects of 2 year’s treatment of osteoporosis with 1a-hydroxy vitamin D3 on bone mineral density and incidence of fracture: a placebo-controlled, double blind prospective study. Endocr. J. 1996, 43, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dawson-Hughes, B.; Harris, S.S.; Krall, E.A.; Dallal, G.E. Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 670–676. [Google Scholar]
  85. Komulainen, M.; Kroger, H.; Tuppurainen, M.T.; Heikkinen, A.M.; Alhava, E.; Honkanen, R.; Saarikoski, S. HRT and vitamin D in prevention of non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women; a 5 year randomized trial. Maturitas 1998, 31, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Stempfle, H.U.; Werner, C.; Echtler, S.; Wehr, U.; Rambeck, W.A.; Siebert, U.; Üderfuhr, P.; Angermann, C.E.; Theisen, K.; Gärtner, R. Prevention of osteoporosis after cardiac transplantation. Transplantation. 1999, 68, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chapuy, M.C.; Pamphile, R.; Paris, E.; Kempf, C.; Schlichting, M.; Arnaud, S.; Garnero, P.; Meunier, P.J. Combined calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation in elderly women: confirmation of reversal of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hip fracture risk: the Decalyos II Study. Osteoporos. Int. 2002, 13, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  88. Harwood, R.H.; Sahota, O.; Gaynor, K.; Masud, T.; Hosking, D.J. Nottingham Neck of Femur [NONOF] Study. A randomised, controlled comparison of different calcium and vitamin D supplementation regimens in elderly women after hip fracture: the Nottingham Neck of Femur [NONOF] Study. Age. Ageing. 2004, 33, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Larsen, E.R.; Mosekilde, L.; Foldspang, A. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures in elderly community dwelling residents: a pragmatic population-based 3-year intervention study. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 370–378. [Google Scholar]
  90. Flicker, L.; MacInnis, R.J.; Stein, M.S.; Scherer, S.C.; Mead, K.E.; Nowson, C.A.; Thomas, J.; Lowndes, C.; Hopper, J.L.; Wark, J.D. Should older people in residential care receive vitamin D to prevent falls? Results of a randomized trial. J.Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 1881–1888. [Google Scholar]
  91. Porthouse, J.; Cockayne, S.; King, C.; Saxon, L.; Steele, E.; Aspray, T.; Baverstock, M.;Birks, Y.; Dumville, J.; Francis, R.; Iglesias, C.; Puffer, S.; Sutcliffe, A.; Watt, I; Torgerson, D.J. Randomised controlled trial of calcium and supplementation with cholecalciferol [vitamin D3] for prevention of fractures in primary care. BMJ 2005, 330, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Jackson, R.D.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Gass, M.; Wallace, R.B.; Robbins, J.; Bassford, T.; Berresford, S.; Black, H.; Blanchette, P.; Bonds, D. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 669–683. [Google Scholar]
  93. Pfeifer, M.; Begerow, B.; Minne, H.W.; Suppan, K.; Fahrleitner-Pammer, A.; Dobnig, H. Effects of a long-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls and parameters of muscle function in community-dwelling older individuals. Osteoporos. Int. 2009, 20, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  94. Chapuy, M.C.; Arlot, M.E.; Delmas, P.D.; Meunier, P.J. Effect of calcium and cholecalciferol treatment for three years on hip fractures in elderly women. BMJ 1994, 308, 1081–1082. [Google Scholar]
  95. Avenell, A.; Gillespie, W.J.; Gillespie, L.D.; O’Connell, D. Vitamin D and vitamin D analoques for preventing fractures associated with involutional and postmenopausalosteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, 2, CD000227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Tang, B.M.P.; Eslick, G.D.; Nowson, C.; Smith, C.; Bensoussan, A. Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2007, 370, 657–666. [Google Scholar]
  97. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Willett, W.C.; Wong, J.B.; Giovannucci, E.; Dietrich, T.; Dawson-Hughes, B. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2005, 293, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar]
  98. Boonen, S.; Lips, P.; Bouillon, R.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A; Vanderschueren, D.; Haentjens, P. Need for additional calcium to reduce the risk of hip fracture with vitamin D supplementation: Evidence from a comparative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. 92, 2007, 1415–1423. [Google Scholar]
  99. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Willett, W.C.; Wong, J.B.; Stuck, A.E.; Staehelin, H.B.; Orav, E.J.; Thoma, A.; Kiel, D.P.; Henschkowski, J. Prevention of non-vertebral fractures with oral vitamin D and dose dependency. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Avernell, A.; Gillespie, W.J.; Gillespie, L.D.; O'Connell, D. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005, 3, CD000227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. The DIPART (vitamin D Individual Patient Analysis of Randomized Trials) Group. Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe. B.M.J. 2010, 340, b5463. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Richy, F.; Schacht, E.; Bruyere, O.; Ethgen, O.; Gourlay, M.; Reginster, J.Y. Vitamin D Analogs Versus Native Vitamin D in Preventing Bone Loss and Osteoporosis-Related Fractures: A Comparative Meta-analysis. Calcif. Tissue. Int. 2005, 76, 176–186. [Google Scholar]
  103. Khaw, K.T.; Sneyd, M.J.; Compston, J. Bone density, parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in middle-aged women. Br. Med. J. 1992, 305, 273–277. [Google Scholar]
  104. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A; Dietrich, T.; Orav, E.J.; Dawson-Hughes, B. Positive association between 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels and bone mineral density: a population-based study of younger and older adults. Am. J. Med. 2004, 116, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nordin, B.E.C.; Baker, M.R.; Horsman, A.; Peacock, M. A prospective trial of the effect of vitamin D supplementation on metacarpal bone loss in elderly women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985, 42, 470–474. [Google Scholar]
  106. Ooms, M.E.; Roos, J.C.; Bezemer, P.D.; Van Der Vijgh, J.F.; Bouter, L.M.; Lips, P. Prevention of bone loss by vitamin D supplementation in elderly women: a randomized double-blind trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar]
  107. Adams, J.S.; Kantorovich, V.; Wu, C.; Javanbakht, M.; Hollis, B.W. Resolution of vitamin D insufficiency in osteopenic patients results in rapid recovery of bone mineral density. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 2729–2730. [Google Scholar]
  108. Hunter, D.; Major, P.; Arden, N.; Swaminathan, R.; Andrew, T.; MacGregor, A.J.; Keen, R.; Snieder, H.; Spector, T.D. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation on preventing postmenopausal bone loss and modifying bone metabolism using identical twin pairs. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 2276–2283. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Patel, R.; Collins, D.; Bullock, S.; Swaminathan, R.; Blake, G.M.; Fogelman, I. The effect of season and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in healthy women: A double-masked crossover study. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Dawson-Hughes, B.; Dallal, G.E.; Krall, E.A.; Harris, S.; Sokoll, L.J.; Falconer, G. Effect of vitamin D supplementationon wintertime and overall bone loss in healthy postmenopausal women. Ann. Intern. Med. 1991, 115, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Sambrook, P.; Birmingham, J.; Kelly, P.; Kempler, S.; Nguyen, T.; Pocock, N.; Eisman, J. Prevention of corticosteroid osteoporosis. A comparison of calcium, calcitriol, and calcitonin. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 328, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Dawson Hughes, B.; Harris, S.S.; Krall, E.L.; Dallal, G.E.; Falconer, G.; Green, C.L. Rates of bone loss in postmenopausal women randomly assigned to one of two dosages of vitamin D. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 61, 1140–1145. [Google Scholar]
  113. Adachi, J.D.; Bensen, W.G.; Bianchi, F.; Cividino, A.; Pillersdorf, S.; Sebaldt, R.J.; Tugwell, P.; Gordon, M.; Steele, M.; Webber, C.; Goldsmith, C.H. Vitamin D and calcium in the prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis: a 3 year followup. J. Rheum. 1996, 23, 995–1000. [Google Scholar]
  114. Bernstein, C.N.; Seeger, L.L.; Anton, P.A.; Artinian, L.; Geffrey, S.; Goodman, W.; Belin, T.R.; Shanahan, F. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of calcium supplementation for decreased bone density in corticosteroid-using patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 10, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Buckley, L.M.; Leib, E.S.; Cartularo, K.S.; Vacek, P.M.; Cooper, S.M. Calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation prevents bone loss in the spine secondary to low-dose corticosteroids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Intern. Med. 1996, 125, 961–968. [Google Scholar]
  116. Sato, Y.; Maruoka, H.; Oizumi, K. Amelioration of hemiplegia-associated osteopenia more than 4 years after stroke by 1a-hydroxyvitamin D3 and calcium supplementation. Stroke 1997, 28, 736–739. [Google Scholar]
  117. Baeksgaard, L.; Andersen, K.P.; Hyldstrup, L. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation increases spinal BMD in healthy, postmenopausal women. Osteoporos. Int. 1998, 8, 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  118. Lambrinoudaki, I.; Chan, D.T.; Lau, C.S.; Wong, R.W.; Yeung, S.S.; Kung, A.W. Effect of calcitriol on bone mineral density in premenopausal Chinese women taking chronic steroid therapy. A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J. Rheumatol. 2000, 27, 1759–1765. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Sambrook, P.; Henderson, N.K.; Keogh, A.; Maodonald, P.; Glanville, A. Effect of calcitriol on bone loss after cardiac or lung transplantation. J. Bone. Min. Res. 2000, 15, 1818–1824. [Google Scholar]
  120. Cooper, L.; Clifton-Bligh, P.; Nery, M.L.; Figtree, G.; Twigg, S.; Hibbert, E.; Robinson, B.G. Vitamin D supplementation and bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Meier, C.; Woitge, H.W.; Witte, K.; Lemmer, B.; Seibel, M.J. Supplementation with oral vitamin D3 and calciumduring winter season prevents seasonal bone loss: a randomized controlled open-label prospective trial. J. Bone. Min. Res. 2004, 19, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar]
  122. Aloia, J.F.; Talwar, S.A.; Pollack, S.; Yeh, J. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D3 supplementation in African American women. Arch. Inter. Med. 2005, 165, 1618–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mocanu, V.; Stitt, P.A.; Costan, A.R.; Voroniuc, O.; Zbranca, E.; Luca, V.; Vieth, R. Long-term effects of giving nursing home residents bread fortified with 125 µg [5000 IU] vitamin D3 per daily serving. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1132–1137. [Google Scholar]
  124. Nelson, D.A.; Barondess, D.A.; Hendrix, S.L.; Beck, T.J. Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1992–1997. [Google Scholar]
  125. Aloia, J.F.; Mikhail, M.; Pagan, C.D.; Arunachalam, A.; Yeh, J.K.; Flaster, E. Biochemical and hormonalvariables in black and white women matched for age and weight. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1998, 132, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  126. Gillespie, L.D.; Gillespie, W.J.; Robertson, M.C.; Lamb, S.E.; Cumming, R.G.; Rowe, B.H. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003, 4, CD000340. [Google Scholar]
  127. Boland, R. Role of vitamin D in skeletal muscle function. Endocr. Rev. 1986, 7, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  128. Pfeifer, M.; Begerow, B.; Minne, H.W.; Schlotthauer, T.; Pospeschill, M.; Scholz, M.; Lazarescu, A.D.; Pollähne, W. Vitamin D status, trunk muscle strength, body sway, falls, and fractures among 237 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2001, 109, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  129. Costa, E.M.; Blau, H.M.; Feldman, D. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors and hormonal responses in cloned human skeletal muscle cells. Endocrinology 1986, 119, 2214–2220. [Google Scholar]
  130. Simpson, R.U.; Thomas, G.A.; Arnold, A.J. Identification of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors and activities in muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 8882–8891. [Google Scholar]
  131. Sorensen, O.H.; Lund, B.; Saltin, B.; Lund, B.; Andersen, R.B.; Hjorth, L.; Melsen, F.;Mosekilde, L. Myopathy in bone loss of ageing: improvement by treatment with 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol and calcium. Clin. Sci. (Lond). 1979, 56, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. McComas, A.J. Skeletal muscle: form and function. Champaign: Human Kinetics 1996, 62–65. [Google Scholar]
  133. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Dietrich, T.; Orav, J.E.; Hu, F.B.; Zhang, Y.; Karlson, E.W.; Dawson-Hughes, B. Higher 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged >60 yrs. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 752–728. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Glerup, H.; Mikkelsen, K.; Poulsen, L.; Hass, E.; Overbeck, S.; Andersen, H.; Charles, P.; Eriksen, E.F. Hypovitaminosis D myopathy without biochemical signs of osteomalacic bone involvement. Calcif. Tissue. Int. 2000, 66, 419–424. [Google Scholar]
  135. Grady, D.; Halloran, B.; Cummings, S. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and muscle strength in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1991, 73, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar]
  136. Latham, N.K.; Anderson, C.S.; Lee, A.; Bennett, D.A.; Moseley, A.; Cameron, I.D. A randomized, controlled trial of quadriceps resistance exercise and vitamin D in frail older people: the Frailty Interventions Trial in Elderly Subjects (FITNESS). J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2003, 51, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Gerdhem, P.; Ringsberg, K.A.M.; Obrant, K.J.; Akesson, K. Association between 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels, physical activity, muscle strength and fractures in the propective population-based OPRA study of elderly women. Osteoporos. Int. 2005, 16, 1425–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Houston, D.K.; Cesari, M.; Ferruci, L.; Cherubini, A.; Maggio, D.; Bartali, B.; Johnson, M.A.; Schwartz, G.G.; Kritchevsky, S.B. Association between vitamin D and physical performance: The InCHIANTI study. J. Gerontol. 2007, 62, 440–446. [Google Scholar]
  139. Garber, A.J. Effects of parathyroid hormone on skeletal muscle protein and amino acid metabolism in the rat. J. Clin. Invest. 1983, 71, 1806–1821. [Google Scholar]
  140. Mitnick, M.A.; Grey, A.; Masiukiewicz, U.; Bartkiewicz, M.; Rios-Velez, L.; Friedman, S.; Xu, L.; Horowitz, M.C.; Insogna, K. Parathyroid hormone induces hepatic production of bioactive interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 280, E405–E412. [Google Scholar]
  141. Han, K.O.; Choi, J.T.; Moon, I.G.; Jeong, M.S.; Yim, C.H.; Chung, H.Y.; Jang, H.C.; Yoon, H.K.; Han, I.K. Nonassociation of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist genotypes with bone mineral density, bone turnover status, and estrogen responsiveness in Korean postmenopausal women. Bone 2002, 31, 612–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Graafmans, W.C.; Ooms, M.E.; Hofstee, H.M.; Bezemer, P.D.; Bouter, L.M.; Lips, P. Falls in the elderly: a prospective study of risk factors and risk profiles. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1996, 143, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Broe, K.E.; Chen, T.C.; Weinberg, J.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Holick, M.F.; Kiel, D.P. A higher dose of vitamin D reduces the risk of falls in nursing home residents: a randomized, multiple-dose study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007, 55, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  144. Pfeifer, M.; Begerow, B.; Minne, H.W.; Abrams, C.; Nachtigall, D.; Hansen, C. Effects of a short-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on body sway and secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly women. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Bischoff, H.A.; Stahelin, H.B.; Dick, W.; Akos, R.; Knecht, M.; Salis, C.; Nebiker, M.; Theiler, R.; Pfeifer, M.; Begerow, B.; Lew, R.A.; Conzelmann, M. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2003, 18, 43–351. [Google Scholar]
  146. Dukas, L.; Bischoff, H.A.; Lindpaintner, L.S.; Schacht, E.; Birkner-Binder, D.; Damm, T.N.; Thalmann, B.; Stähelin, H.B. Alfacalcidol reduces the number of fallers in a communitydwelling elderly population with a minimum calcium intake of more than 500 mg daily. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2004, 52, 230–236. [Google Scholar]
  147. Flicker, L.; MacInnis, R.J.; Stein, M.S.; Scherer, S.C.; Mead, K.E.; Nowson, C.A.; Thomas, J.; Lowndes, C.; Hopper, J.L.; Wark, J.D. Should older people in residential care receive vitamin D to prevent falls? Results of a randomized trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 1881–1888. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  148. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Orav, E.J.; Dawson-Hughes, B. Effect of cholecalciferol plus calcium on falling in ambulatory older men and women: a 3-year randomized controlled trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  149. Pfeifer, M.; Begerow, B.; Minne, H.W.; Suppan, K.; Fahrleitner-Pammer, A.; Dobnig, H. Effects of a long-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls and parameters of muscle function in community-dwelling older individuals. Osteoporos. Int. 2009, 20, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  150. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Willett, W.C. Effect of Vitamin D on Falls: A Meta-analysis. JAMA 2004, 291, 16. [Google Scholar]
  151. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Staehelin, H.B.; Orav, J.E.; Stuck, A.E.; Theiler, R.; Wong, J.; Egli, A.; Kiel, D.; Henschkowski, J. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2009, 339, 3692. [Google Scholar]
  152. Agrawal, S.; Krueger, D.; Engelke, J.A.; Nest, L.; Krause, P.; Drinka, P.; Binkley, N. Vitamin D status, risedronate and bone turnover in nursing home residents. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2006, 54, 790–795. [Google Scholar]
  153. Linton, P.J.; Dorshkind, K. Age-related changesin lymphocyte development and function. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  154. Gabay, C.; Kushner, I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 448–454. [Google Scholar]
  155. Clowes, J.A.; Riggs, B.L.; Khosla, S. The role of the immune system in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Immunol. Rev. 2005, 208, 207–227. [Google Scholar]
  156. Jilka, R.L.; Hangoc, G.; Girasole, G.; Passeri, G.; Williams, D.C.; Abrams, J.S.; Boyce, B.; Broxmeyer, H.; Manolagas, S.C. Increased osteoclast development after oestrogen loss: mediation by interleukin-6. Science 1992, 257, 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  157. Collin-Osdoby, P.; Rothe, L.; Anderson, F. Receptor activator of NF-kappa B and osteoprotegerin expression by human microvascular endothelial cells, regulation by inflammatory cytokines, and role in human osteoclastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 20659–20672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Bendixen, A.C.; Shevde, N.K.; Dienger, K.M.; Willson, T.M.; Funk, C.D.; Pike, J.W. IL-4 inhibits osteoclast formation through a direct action on osteoclast precursors via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2443–2448. [Google Scholar]
  159. Bertolini, D.R.; Nedwin, G.E.; Bringman, T.S.; Smith, D.D.; Mundy, D.D. Stimulation of bone resorption and inhibition of bone formation in vitro by human tumor necrosis factor. Nature 1986, 319, 516–518. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  160. Wei, S.; Kitaura, H.; Zhou, P.; Patrick, R.F.; Teitelbaum, S.L. IL-1 mediates TNF-induced osteoclastogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 2005, 115, 2. [Google Scholar]
  161. Ershler, W.B.; Keller, E.T. Age-associated increased interleukin-6 gene expression, late-life diseases, and frailty. Annu. Rev. Med. 2000, 51, 245–270. [Google Scholar]
  162. Takeuchi, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Ishii, G.; Takeda, S.; Nakayama, K.; Fukumoto, S.; Kaneta, Y.; Inoue, D.; Matsumoto, T.; Harigaya, K. Interleukin-11 as a stimulatory factor for bone formation prevents bone loss with advancing age in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 49011–49018. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  163. Palmqvist, P.; Persson, E.; Conaway, H.H.; Lerner, U.H. IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M stimulate bone resorption and regulate the expression of receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF-kappa B in mouse calvar. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 3353–3362. [Google Scholar]
  164. Ding, C.; Parameswaran, V.; Udayan, R.; Burgess, J.; Jones, G. Circulating Levels of Inflammatory Markers Predict Change in Bone Mineral Density and Resorption in Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 1952–1958. [Google Scholar]
  165. Scheidt-Nave, C.; Bismar, H.; Leidig-Bruckner, G.; Woitge, H.; Seibel, M.J.; Ziegler, R.; Pfeilschifter, J. Serum interleukin 6 is a major predictor of bone loss in women specific to the first decade past menopause. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 2032–2042. [Google Scholar]
  166. McKane, W.R.; Khosla, S.; Peterson, J.M.; Egan, K.; Riggs, B.L. Circulating levels of cytokines that modulate bone resorption: effects of age and menopause in women. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 1994, 9, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar]
  167. Kania, D.M.; Binkley, N.; Checovich, M.; Havighurst, T.; Schilling, M.; Ershler, W.B. Elevated plasma levels of interleukin-6 in postmenopausal women do not correlate with bone density. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1995, 43, 236–239. [Google Scholar]
  168. Abrahamsen, B.; Bonnevie-Nielsen, V.; Ebbesen, E.N.; Gram, J.; Beck-Nielsen, H. Cytokines and bone loss in a 5-year longitudinal study-hormone replacement therapy suppresses serum soluble interleukin-6 receptor and increases interleukin-1-receptor antagonist: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1545–1554. [Google Scholar]
  169. Nanes, M.S. Tumor necrosis factor- α: molecular and cellular mechanisms in skeletal pathology. Gene 2003, 321, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  170. Gaffen, S. L. Biology of recently discovered cytokines: interleukin- 17-a unique inflammatory cytokine with roles in bone biology and arthritis. Arthritis. Res. Ther. 2004, 6, 240–247. [Google Scholar]
  171. Goswami, J.; Hernández-Santos, N.; Zuniga, L.A.; Gaffen, S.L. A bone-protective role for IL-17 receptor signaling in ovariectomy-induced bone loss Europ. J. Immun. 2009, 39, 2831–2839. [Google Scholar]
  172. Kim, J.G.; Lim, K.S.; Ku, S.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Choi, Y.M.; Moon, S.Y. Relations between interleukin-1, its receptor antagonist gene polymorphism, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal Korean women. J. Bone. Miner. Metab. 2006, 24, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Langdahl, B.L.; Løkke, E.; Carstens, M.; Stenkjaer, L.L.; Eriksen, E.F. Osteoporotic fractures are associated with an 86-base pair repeat polymorphism in the interleukin-1--receptor antagonist gene but not with polymorphisms in the interleukin-1beta gene. J Bone Miner Res. 2000, 15, 402–414. [Google Scholar]
  174. Han, K.O.; Choi, J.T.; Moon, I.G.; Jeong, M.S.; Yim, C.H.; Chung, H.Y.; Jang, H.C.; Yoon, H.K.; Han, I.K. Nonassociation of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist genotypes with bone mineral density, bone turnover status, and estrogen responsiveness in Korean postmenopausal women. Bone 2002, 31, 612–615. [Google Scholar]
  175. Ferrari, S.L.; Ahn-Luong, L.; Garnero, P.; Humphries, S.E.; Greenspan, S.L. Two promoter polymorphisms regulating interleukin-6 gene expression are associated with circulating levels of C-reactive protein and markers of bone resorption in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  176. Ferrari, L.S.; Karasik, D.; Liu, J.; Karamohamed, S.; Herbert, A.G.; Cupples, L.; Kiel, P.D. Interactions of Interleukin-6 Promoter Polymorphisms With Dietary and Lifestyle Factors and Their Association With Bone Mass in Men and Women From the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 552–559. [Google Scholar]
  177. Spotila, L.D.; Rodriguez, H.; Koch, M.; Adams, K.; Caminis, J.; Tenenhouse, H.S.; Tenenhouse, A. Association of a polymorphism in the TNFR2 gene with low bone mineral density. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1376–1383. [Google Scholar]
  178. Albagha, O.M.E.; Tasker, P.N.; McGuigan, F.E.A.; Reid, D.M.; Ralston, S.H. Linkage disequilibrium between polymorphisms in the human TNFRSF1B gene and their association with bone mass in perimenopausal women. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 2289–2295. [Google Scholar]
  179. Hutter, C.; Laing, P. Multiple sclerosis: sunlight, diet, immunology and aetiology. Med. Hypotheses. 1996, 46, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  180. Merlino, L.A,.; Curtis, J.; Mikuls, T.R.; Cerhan, J.R.; Criswell, L.A.; Saag, K.G. Vitamin D intake is inversely associated with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Arthritis. Rheum. 2004, 50, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Veldman, C.M.; Cantorna, M.T.; DeLuca, H.F. Expression of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor in the immune system. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 15, 334–338. [Google Scholar]
  182. De Luca, H.F.; Cantorna, M.T. Vitamin D: its role and uses in immunology. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 2579–2585. [Google Scholar]
  183. Muller, K.; Haahr, P.M.; Diamant, M. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits cytokine production by human blood monocytes at the post-transcriptional level. Cytokine 1992, 4, 506–512. [Google Scholar]
  184. Evans, K.N.; Nguyen, L.; Chan, J.; Innes, B.A.; Bulmer, J.N.; Kilby, M.D.; Hewison, M. Effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on cytokine production by human decidual cells. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 75, 816–822. [Google Scholar]
  185. Zhu, Y.; Mahon, B.D.; Froicu, M.; Cantorna, M.T. Calcium and 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target the TNF-alpha pathway to suppress experimental inflammatory bowel disease. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  186. Schleithoff, S.S.; Zittermann, A.; Tenderich, G.; Berthold, H.K.; Stehle, P.; Koerfer, R. Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  187. Mahon, B.D.; Gordon, S.A.; Cruz, J.; Cosman, F.; Cantorna, M.T. Cytokine profile in patients with multiple sclerosis following vitamin D supplementation. J. Neuroimmunol. 2003, 134, 128–132. [Google Scholar]
  188. Inanir, A.; Ozoran, K.; Tutkak, H.; Mermerci, B. The effects of calcitriol therapy on serum interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha concentrations in post-menopausal patients with osteoporosis. J. Int. Med. Res. 2004, 32, 570–582. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Laird, E.; Ward, M.; McSorley, E.; Strain, J.J.; Wallace, J. Vitamin D and Bone Health; Potential Mechanisms. Nutrients 2010, 2, 693-724. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2070693

AMA Style

Laird E, Ward M, McSorley E, Strain JJ, Wallace J. Vitamin D and Bone Health; Potential Mechanisms. Nutrients. 2010; 2(7):693-724. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2070693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Laird, Eamon, Mary Ward, Emeir McSorley, J.J. Strain, and Julie Wallace. 2010. "Vitamin D and Bone Health; Potential Mechanisms" Nutrients 2, no. 7: 693-724. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2070693

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop