The objective of this study was to identify the natural history and clinical predictors of postoperative recurrence of skull base and non–skull base meningiomas.
The authors performed a retrospective hospital-based study of all patients with meningioma referred to their institution from September 1993 to January 2014. The cohort constituted both patients with a first-time presentation and those with evidence of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for analysis of recurrence and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify potential predictors of recurrence.
Overall, 398 intracranial meningiomas were reviewed, including 269 (68%) non–skull base and 129 (32%) skull base meningiomas (median follow-up 30.2 months, interquartile range [IQR] 8.5–76 months). The 10-year recurrence-free survival rates for patients with gross-total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) were 90% and 43%, respectively. Skull base tumors were associated with a lower proliferation index (0.041 vs 0.062, p = 0.001), higher likelihood of WHO Grade I (85.3% vs 69.1%, p = 0.003), and younger patient age (55.2 vs 58.3 years, p = 0.01). Meningiomas in all locations demonstrated an average recurrence rate of 30% at 100 months of follow-up. Subsequently, the recurrence of skull base meningiomas plateaued whereas non–skull base lesions had an 80% recurrence rate at 230 months follow-up (p = 0.02). On univariate analysis, a prior history of recurrence (p < 0.001), initial WHO grade following resection (p < 0.001), and the inability to obtain GTR (p < 0.001) were predictors of future recurrence. On multivariate analysis a prior history of recurrence (p = 0.02) and an STR (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of a recurrence. Assessing only patients with primary presentations, STR and WHO Grades II and III were independent predictors of recurrence (p < 0.001 for both).
Patients with skull base meningiomas present at a younger age and have less aggressive lesions overall. Extent of resection is a key predictor of recurrence and long-term follow-up of meningiomas is necessary, especially for non–skull base tumors. In skull base meningiomas, recurrence risk plateaus approximately 100 months after surgery, suggesting that for this specific cohort, follow-up after 100 months can be less frequent.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 1, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS15546.
Adegbite AB, , Khan MI, , Paine KW, & Tan LK: The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurosurg 58:51–56, 1983
Al-Mefty O, , Kadri PA, , Pravdenkova S, , Sawyer JR, , Stangeby C, & Husain M: Malignant progression in meningioma: documentation of a series and analysis of cytogenetic findings. J Neurosurg 101:210–218, 2004
Berghoff AS, , Stefanits H, , Woehrer A, , Heinzl H, , Preusser M, & Hainfellner JA: Clinical neuropathology practice guide 3-2013: levels of evidence and clinical utility of prognostic and predictive candidate brain tumor biomarkers. Clin Neuropathol 32:148–158, 2013
Borovich B, & Doron Y: Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: the role played by regional multicentricity. J Neurosurg 64:58–63, 1986
Brastianos PK, , Horowitz PM, , Santagata S, , Jones RT, , McKenna A, & Getz G, et al.: Genomic sequencing of meningiomas identifies oncogenic SMO and AKT1 mutations. Nat Genet 45:285–289, 2013
Christensen D, , Laursen H, & Klinken L: Prediction of recurrence in meningiomas after surgical treatment. A quantitative approach. Acta Neuropathol 61:130–134, 1983
Clark VE, , Erson-Omay EZ, , Serin A, , Yin J, , Cotney J, & Ozduman K, et al.: Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 339:1077–1080, 2013
Halaka AN, , Bunning RA, , Bird CC, , Gibson M, & Reynolds JJ: Production of collagenase and inhibitor (TIMP) by intracranial tumors and dura in vitro. J Neurosurg 59:461–466, 1983
Hashimoto N, , Rabo CS, , Okita Y, , Kinoshita M, , Kagawa N, & Fujimoto Y, et al.: Slower growth of skull base meningiomas compared with non-skull base meningiomas based on volumetric and biological studies. J Neurosurg 116:574–580, 2012
Hayhurst C, & Zadeh G: Tumor pseudoprogression following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol 14:87–92, 2012
Hsu DW, , Efird JT, & Hedley-Whyte ET: Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg 86:113–120, 1997
Jääskeläinen J: Seemingly complete removal of histologically benign intracranial meningioma: late recurrence rate and factors predicting recurrence in 657 patients. A multivariate analysis. Surg Neurol 26:461–469, 1986
Kane AJ, , Sughrue ME, , Rutkowski MJ, , Shangari G, , Fang S, & McDermott MW, et al.: Anatomic location is a risk factor for atypical and malignant meningiomas. Cancer 117:1272–1278, 2011
Kasuya H, , Kubo O, , Tanaka M, , Amano K, , Kato K, & Hori T: Clinical and radiological features related to the growth potential of meningioma. Neurosurg Rev 29:293–297, 2006
Ketter R, , Rahnenführer J, , Henn W, , Kim YJ, , Feiden W, & Steudel WI, et al.: Correspondence of tumor localization with tumor recurrence and cytogenetic progression in meningiomas. Neurosurgery 62:61–70, 2008
Langford LA, , Cooksley CS, & DeMonte F: Comparison of MIB-1 (Ki-67) antigen and bromodeoxyuridine proliferation indices in meningiomas. Hum Pathol 27:350–354, 1996
Mahmood A, , Qureshi NH, & Malik GM: Intracranial meningiomas: analysis of recurrence after surgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 126:53–58, 1994
Marks SM, , Whitwell HL, & Lye RH: Recurrence of meningiomas after operation. Surg Neurol 25:436–440, 1986
Mathiesen T, , Lindquist C, , Kihlström L, & Karlsson B: Recurrence of cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 39:2–9, 1996
McGovern SL, , Aldape KD, , Munsell MF, , Mahajan A, , DeMonte F, & Woo SY: A comparison of World Health Organization tumor grades at recurrence in patients with non-skull base and skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg 112:925–933, 2010
Mirimanoff RO, , Dosoretz DE, , Linggood RM, , Ojemann RG, & Martuza RL: Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg 62:18–24, 1985
Mizoue T, , Kawamoto H, , Arita K, , Tominaga A, & Kurisu K: Secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 by meningiomas detected by cell immunoblot analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:481–486, 1999
Morimura T, , Kitz K, & Budka H: In situ analysis of cell kinetics in human brain tumors. A comparative immunocytochemical study of S phase cells by a new in vitro bromodeoxyuridine-labeling technique, and of proliferating pool cells by monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Acta Neuropathol 77:276–282, 1989
Nanda A, & Vannemreddy P: Recurrence and outcome in skull base meningiomas: do they differ from other intracranial meningiomas?. Skull Base 18:243–252, 2008
Nunes F, , Shen Y, , Niida Y, , Beauchamp R, , Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, & Ramesh V, et al.: Inactivation patterns of NF2 and DAL-1/4.1B (EPB41L3) in sporadic meningioma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 162:135–139, 2005
Olar A, , Wani KM, , Sulman EP, , Mansouri A, , Zadeh G, & Wilson CD, et al.: Mitotic index is an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in meningioma. Brain Pathol 25:266–275, 2015
Prayson RA: Malignant meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of 23 patients including MIB1 and p53 immunohistochemistry. Am J Clin Pathol 105:719–726, 1996
Prayson RA: The utility of MIB-1/Ki-67 immunostainingin the evaluation of central nervous system neoplasms. Adv Anat Pathol 12:144–148, 2005
Sade B, , Chahlavi A, , Krishnaney A, , Nagel S, , Choi E, & Lee JH: World Health Organization Grades II and III meningiomas are rare in the cranial base and spine. Neurosurgery 61:1194–1198, 2007
Simpson D: The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–39, 1957
Sughrue ME, , Kane AJ, , Shangari G, , Rutkowski MJ, , McDermott MW, & Berger MS, et al.: The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg 113:1029–1035, 2010
Wiemels J, , Wrensch M, & Claus EB: Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 99:307–314, 2010
Yushkevich PA, , Piven J, , Hazlett HC, , Smith RG, , Ho S, & Gee JC, et al.: User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128, 2006
Zhou K, , Wang G, , Wang Y, , Jin H, , Yang S, & Liu C: The potential involvement of E-cadherin and beta-catenins in meningioma. PLoS One 5:e11231, 2010
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 483 | 458 | 38 |
Full Text Views | 1475 | 29 | 0 |
PDF Downloads | 861 | 43 | 0 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |