This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Surgically resected skull base meningiomas demonstrate a divergent postoperative recurrence pattern compared with non–skull base meningiomas

Alireza Mansouri Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;
Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton; and

Search for other papers by Alireza Mansouri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
George Klironomos Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;
Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;

Search for other papers by George Klironomos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Shervin Taslimi Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;
Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;

Search for other papers by Shervin Taslimi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MPH
,
Alex Kilian Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;

Search for other papers by Alex Kilian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fred Gentili Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;
Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;

Search for other papers by Fred Gentili in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MSc
,
Osaama H. Khan Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;
Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;

Search for other papers by Osaama H. Khan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Kenneth Aldape Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Kenneth Aldape in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Gelareh Zadeh Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;
Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto;

Search for other papers by Gelareh Zadeh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $536.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $636.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $536.00
USD  $636.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify the natural history and clinical predictors of postoperative recurrence of skull base and non–skull base meningiomas.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective hospital-based study of all patients with meningioma referred to their institution from September 1993 to January 2014. The cohort constituted both patients with a first-time presentation and those with evidence of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for analysis of recurrence and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify potential predictors of recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 398 intracranial meningiomas were reviewed, including 269 (68%) non–skull base and 129 (32%) skull base meningiomas (median follow-up 30.2 months, interquartile range [IQR] 8.5–76 months). The 10-year recurrence-free survival rates for patients with gross-total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) were 90% and 43%, respectively. Skull base tumors were associated with a lower proliferation index (0.041 vs 0.062, p = 0.001), higher likelihood of WHO Grade I (85.3% vs 69.1%, p = 0.003), and younger patient age (55.2 vs 58.3 years, p = 0.01). Meningiomas in all locations demonstrated an average recurrence rate of 30% at 100 months of follow-up. Subsequently, the recurrence of skull base meningiomas plateaued whereas non–skull base lesions had an 80% recurrence rate at 230 months follow-up (p = 0.02). On univariate analysis, a prior history of recurrence (p < 0.001), initial WHO grade following resection (p < 0.001), and the inability to obtain GTR (p < 0.001) were predictors of future recurrence. On multivariate analysis a prior history of recurrence (p = 0.02) and an STR (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of a recurrence. Assessing only patients with primary presentations, STR and WHO Grades II and III were independent predictors of recurrence (p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with skull base meningiomas present at a younger age and have less aggressive lesions overall. Extent of resection is a key predictor of recurrence and long-term follow-up of meningiomas is necessary, especially for non–skull base tumors. In skull base meningiomas, recurrence risk plateaus approximately 100 months after surgery, suggesting that for this specific cohort, follow-up after 100 months can be less frequent.

ABBREVIATIONS

CI = confidence interval ; EOR = extent of resection ; GTR = gross-total resection ; IQR = interquartile range ; NF2 = neurofibromatosis Type 2 ; OR = odds ratio ; PR = progesterone receptor ; STR = subtotal resection .
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Adegbite AB, , Khan MI, , Paine KW, & Tan LK: The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurosurg 58:5156, 1983

  • 2

    Al-Mefty O, , Kadri PA, , Pravdenkova S, , Sawyer JR, , Stangeby C, & Husain M: Malignant progression in meningioma: documentation of a series and analysis of cytogenetic findings. J Neurosurg 101:210218, 2004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Berghoff AS, , Stefanits H, , Woehrer A, , Heinzl H, , Preusser M, & Hainfellner JA: Clinical neuropathology practice guide 3-2013: levels of evidence and clinical utility of prognostic and predictive candidate brain tumor biomarkers. Clin Neuropathol 32:148158, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Borovich B, & Doron Y: Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: the role played by regional multicentricity. J Neurosurg 64:5863, 1986

  • 5

    Brastianos PK, , Horowitz PM, , Santagata S, , Jones RT, , McKenna A, & Getz G, et al.: Genomic sequencing of meningiomas identifies oncogenic SMO and AKT1 mutations. Nat Genet 45:285289, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Christensen D, , Laursen H, & Klinken L: Prediction of recurrence in meningiomas after surgical treatment. A quantitative approach. Acta Neuropathol 61:130134, 1983

  • 7

    Clark VE, , Erson-Omay EZ, , Serin A, , Yin J, , Cotney J, & Ozduman K, et al.: Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 339:10771080, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Halaka AN, , Bunning RA, , Bird CC, , Gibson M, & Reynolds JJ: Production of collagenase and inhibitor (TIMP) by intracranial tumors and dura in vitro. J Neurosurg 59:461466, 1983

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hashimoto N, , Rabo CS, , Okita Y, , Kinoshita M, , Kagawa N, & Fujimoto Y, et al.: Slower growth of skull base meningiomas compared with non-skull base meningiomas based on volumetric and biological studies. J Neurosurg 116:574580, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hayhurst C, & Zadeh G: Tumor pseudoprogression following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol 14:8792, 2012

  • 11

    Hsu DW, , Efird JT, & Hedley-Whyte ET: Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg 86:113120, 1997

  • 12

    Jääskeläinen J: Seemingly complete removal of histologically benign intracranial meningioma: late recurrence rate and factors predicting recurrence in 657 patients. A multivariate analysis. Surg Neurol 26:461469, 1986

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kane AJ, , Sughrue ME, , Rutkowski MJ, , Shangari G, , Fang S, & McDermott MW, et al.: Anatomic location is a risk factor for atypical and malignant meningiomas. Cancer 117:12721278, 2011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kasuya H, , Kubo O, , Tanaka M, , Amano K, , Kato K, & Hori T: Clinical and radiological features related to the growth potential of meningioma. Neurosurg Rev 29:293297, 2006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Ketter R, , Rahnenführer J, , Henn W, , Kim YJ, , Feiden W, & Steudel WI, et al.: Correspondence of tumor localization with tumor recurrence and cytogenetic progression in meningiomas. Neurosurgery 62:6170, 2008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Langford LA, , Cooksley CS, & DeMonte F: Comparison of MIB-1 (Ki-67) antigen and bromodeoxyuridine proliferation indices in meningiomas. Hum Pathol 27:350354, 1996

  • 17

    Mahmood A, , Qureshi NH, & Malik GM: Intracranial meningiomas: analysis of recurrence after surgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 126:5358, 1994

  • 18

    Marks SM, , Whitwell HL, & Lye RH: Recurrence of meningiomas after operation. Surg Neurol 25:436440, 1986

  • 19

    Mathiesen T, , Lindquist C, , Kihlström L, & Karlsson B: Recurrence of cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 39:29, 1996

  • 20

    McGovern SL, , Aldape KD, , Munsell MF, , Mahajan A, , DeMonte F, & Woo SY: A comparison of World Health Organization tumor grades at recurrence in patients with non-skull base and skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg 112:925933, 2010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Mirimanoff RO, , Dosoretz DE, , Linggood RM, , Ojemann RG, & Martuza RL: Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg 62:1824, 1985

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Mizoue T, , Kawamoto H, , Arita K, , Tominaga A, & Kurisu K: Secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 by meningiomas detected by cell immunoblot analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:481486, 1999

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Morimura T, , Kitz K, & Budka H: In situ analysis of cell kinetics in human brain tumors. A comparative immunocytochemical study of S phase cells by a new in vitro bromodeoxyuridine-labeling technique, and of proliferating pool cells by monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Acta Neuropathol 77:276282, 1989

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Nanda A, & Vannemreddy P: Recurrence and outcome in skull base meningiomas: do they differ from other intracranial meningiomas?. Skull Base 18:243252, 2008

  • 25

    Nunes F, , Shen Y, , Niida Y, , Beauchamp R, , Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, & Ramesh V, et al.: Inactivation patterns of NF2 and DAL-1/4.1B (EPB41L3) in sporadic meningioma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 162:135139, 2005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Olar A, , Wani KM, , Sulman EP, , Mansouri A, , Zadeh G, & Wilson CD, et al.: Mitotic index is an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in meningioma. Brain Pathol 25:266275, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Prayson RA: Malignant meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of 23 patients including MIB1 and p53 immunohistochemistry. Am J Clin Pathol 105:719726, 1996

  • 28

    Prayson RA: The utility of MIB-1/Ki-67 immunostainingin the evaluation of central nervous system neoplasms. Adv Anat Pathol 12:144148, 2005

  • 29

    Sade B, , Chahlavi A, , Krishnaney A, , Nagel S, , Choi E, & Lee JH: World Health Organization Grades II and III meningiomas are rare in the cranial base and spine. Neurosurgery 61:11941198, 2007

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Simpson D: The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:2239, 1957

  • 31

    Sughrue ME, , Kane AJ, , Shangari G, , Rutkowski MJ, , McDermott MW, & Berger MS, et al.: The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg 113:10291035, 2010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Wiemels J, , Wrensch M, & Claus EB: Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 99:307314, 2010

  • 33

    Yushkevich PA, , Piven J, , Hazlett HC, , Smith RG, , Ho S, & Gee JC, et al.: User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:11161128, 2006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Zhou K, , Wang G, , Wang Y, , Jin H, , Yang S, & Liu C: The potential involvement of E-cadherin and beta-catenins in meningioma. PLoS One 5:e11231, 2010

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 483 458 38
Full Text Views 1475 29 0
PDF Downloads 861 43 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0