This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States

Eric J. Neumann Office of Swine Health Information and Research, National Pork Board, 1776 NW 114th St, Clive, IA 50325.

Search for other papers by Eric J. Neumann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
James B. Kliebenstein Department of Economics, College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Search for other papers by James B. Kliebenstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Colin D. Johnson Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Search for other papers by Colin D. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
John W. Mabry Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Search for other papers by John W. Mabry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Eric J. Bush USDA, Centers for National Animal Health Surveillance, Fort Collins, CO 80526.

Search for other papers by Eric J. Bush in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Ann H. Seitzinger USDA, Centers for National Animal Health Surveillance, Fort Collins, CO 80526.

Search for other papers by Ann H. Seitzinger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Alice L. Green USDA, Centers for National Animal Health Surveillance, Fort Collins, CO 80526.

Search for other papers by Alice L. Green in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
, and
Jeffrey J. Zimmerman Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Search for other papers by Jeffrey J. Zimmerman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVPM

Abstract

Objective—To estimate the annual cost of infections attributable to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus to US swine producers.

Design—Economic analysis.

Sample Population—Data on the health and productivity of PRRS-affected and PRRS-unaffected breeding herds and growing-pig populations were collected from a convenience sample of swine farms in the midwestern United States.

Procedure—Health and productivity variables of PRRS-affected and PRRS-unaffected swine farms were analyzed to estimate the impact of PRRS on specific farms. National estimates of PRRS incidence were then used to determine the annual economic impact of PRRS on US swine producers.

Results—PRRS affected breeding herds and growing-pig populations as measured by a decrease in reproductive health, an increase in deaths, and reductions in the rate and efficiency of growth. Total annual economic impact of these effects on US swine producers was estimated at $66.75 million in breeding herds and $493.57 million in growing-pig populations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—PRRS imposes a substantial financial burden on US swine producers and causes approximately $560.32 million in losses each year. By comparison, prior to eradication, annual losses attributable to classical swine fever (hog cholera) and pseudorabies were estimated at $364.09 million and $36.27 million, respectively (adjusted on the basis of year 2004 dollars). Current PRRS control strategies are not predictably successful; thus, PRRS-associated losses will continue into the future. Research to improve our understanding of ecologic and epidemiologic characteristics of the PRRS virus and technologic advances (vaccines and diagnostic tests) to prevent clinical effects are warranted. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:385–392)

Abstract

Objective—To estimate the annual cost of infections attributable to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus to US swine producers.

Design—Economic analysis.

Sample Population—Data on the health and productivity of PRRS-affected and PRRS-unaffected breeding herds and growing-pig populations were collected from a convenience sample of swine farms in the midwestern United States.

Procedure—Health and productivity variables of PRRS-affected and PRRS-unaffected swine farms were analyzed to estimate the impact of PRRS on specific farms. National estimates of PRRS incidence were then used to determine the annual economic impact of PRRS on US swine producers.

Results—PRRS affected breeding herds and growing-pig populations as measured by a decrease in reproductive health, an increase in deaths, and reductions in the rate and efficiency of growth. Total annual economic impact of these effects on US swine producers was estimated at $66.75 million in breeding herds and $493.57 million in growing-pig populations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—PRRS imposes a substantial financial burden on US swine producers and causes approximately $560.32 million in losses each year. By comparison, prior to eradication, annual losses attributable to classical swine fever (hog cholera) and pseudorabies were estimated at $364.09 million and $36.27 million, respectively (adjusted on the basis of year 2004 dollars). Current PRRS control strategies are not predictably successful; thus, PRRS-associated losses will continue into the future. Research to improve our understanding of ecologic and epidemiologic characteristics of the PRRS virus and technologic advances (vaccines and diagnostic tests) to prevent clinical effects are warranted. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:385–392)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2332 0 0
Full Text Views 3481 2186 114
PDF Downloads 1896 886 82
Advertisement