Skip to main content

Advertisement

Cryoablation of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Work-in-Progress Report of a Multi-Institutional Trial

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With recent improvements in breast imaging, our ability to identify small breast tumors has markedly improved, prompting significant interest in the use of ablation without surgical excision to treat early-stage breast cancer. We conducted a multi-institutional pilot safety study of cryoablation in the treatment of primary breast carcinomas.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with ultrasound-visible primary invasive breast cancer ≤2.0 cm were enrolled. Twenty-seven (93%) successfully underwent ultrasound-guided cryoablation with a tabletop argon gas-based cryoablation system with a double freeze/thaw cycle. Standard surgical resection was performed 1 to 4 weeks after cryoablation. Patients were monitored for complications, and pathology data were used to assess efficacy.

Results

Cryoablation was successfully performed in an office-based setting with only local anesthesia. There were no complications to the procedure or postprocedural pain requiring narcotic pain medications. Cryoablation successfully destroyed 100% of cancers <1.0 cm. For tumors between 1.0 and 1.5 cm, this success rate was achieved only in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma without a significant ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) component. For unselected tumors >1.5 cm, cryoablation was not reliable with this technique. Patients with noncalcified DCIS were the cause of most cryoablation failures.

Conclusions

Cryoablation is a safe and well-tolerated office-based procedure for the ablation of early-stage breast cancer. At this time, cryoablation should be limited to patients with invasive ductal carcinoma ≤1.5 cm and with <25% DCIS in the core biopsy. A multicenter phase II clinical trial is planned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:8–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:822–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, et al. The new era in breast cancer: invasion, size and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 1996;131:301–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeffrey SS, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer. First report of an emerging technology. Arch Surg 1999;134:1064–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Izzo F, Thomas R, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in patients with primary breast carcinoma. A pilot study in 26 patients. Cancer 2001;92:2036–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singletary SE. Minimally invasive ablation techniques in breast cancer treatment (editorial). Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:319–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singletary SE, Fornage BD, Sneige N, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of early-stage invasive breast tumors: an overview. Cancer J 2002;8:177–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Staren ED, Sabel MS, Gianakakis LM, et al. Cryosurgery of breast cancer. Arch Surg 1997;132:28–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfleiderer SO, Freesmeyer MG, Marx C, et al. Cryotherapy of breast cancer under ultrasound guidance: initial results and limitations. Eur Radiol 2002;12:3009–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson DS, Parel J-M, Denham DB, et al. Interstitial laser hyperthermia model development for minimally invasive therapy of breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:284–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson DS, Parel J-M, Denham DB, et al. Stereotactic uses beyond core biopsy: model development for minimally invasive treatment of breast cancer through interstitial laser hyperthermia. Am Surg 1996;62:117–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harries SA, Amin Z, Smith ME, et al. Interstitial laser photocoagulation as a treatment for breast cancer. Br J Surg 1994;81:1617–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dowlatshahi K, Bauich D, Kluiber R. Histologic evaluation of rat mammary tumor necrosis by interstitial Nd: YAG laser hyperthermia. Lasers Surg Med 1992;12:159–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Gould VE, et al. Stereotactically guided laser therapy of occult breast tumors: work in progress report. Arch Surg 2000;135:1345–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dowlatshahi K, Francescatti DS, Bloom KJ. Laser therapy for small breast cancers. Am J Surg 2002;184:359–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mumtaz H, Hall-Graggs MA, Wotherspoon A, et al. Laser therapy for breast cancer: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;200:651–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harms SE. MR-guided minimally invasive procedures. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001;9:381–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill CR, ter Haar GR. High intensity focused ultrasound—potential for cancer treatment. Br J Radiol 1995;68:1296–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ter Haar GR. Ultrasound focal beam surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995;21:1089–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bohris C, Jenne JW, Rastert R, et al. MR monitoring of focused ultrasound surgery (FUS) in a breast tissue model. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:167–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hynynen K, Darkazanli A, Unger E, Schenck JF. MRI-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Med Phys 1993;20:107–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung AH, Jolesz FA, Hynyen K. Thermal dosimetry of a focused ultrasound beam in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1999;26:2017–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Graham SJ, Chen L, Leitch M, et al. Quantifying tissue damage due to focused ultrasound heating observed by MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:321–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hynynen K, Pomeroy O, Smith DN, et al. MR Imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:176–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huber PE, Jenne JW, Rastert R, et al. A new non-invasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer Res 2001;61:8441–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaudhary SS, Mishra RK, Swarup A, Thomas JM. Dielectric properties of normal and malignant human breast tissue at radiowave and microwave frequencies. Indian J Biochem Biophys 1984;21:76–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Joines WT, Zhang Y, Li C, Jirtle RL. The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Med Phys 1994;21:547–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Campbell AM, Land DV. Dielectric properties of female human breast tissue measured in vitro at 3.2 GHz. Phys Med Biol 1992;37:193–210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gardner RA, Vargas HI, Block JB, et al. Focused microwave phased array thermotherapy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:326–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ravikumar TS. The role of cryotherapy in the management of patients with liver tumors. Adv Surg 1997;30:281–91.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weaver ML, Ashton JG, Zemel R. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases by cryotherapy. Semin Surg Oncol 1998;14:167–70.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gage AA, Huben R. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Urol Oncol 2000;5:11–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Onik GM, Cohen J, Reyes G, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided percutaneous radical cryoablation of the prostate. Cancer 1993;72:1291–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Uchida M, Imaide Y, Sugimoto K, et al. Percutaneous cryosurgery for renal tumors. Br J Urol 1995;75:132–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rukstalis D, Khorsandi M, Garcia F, et al. Clinical experience with renal cryoablation. Urology 2001;57:34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzuki Y. Cryosurgical treatment of advanced breast cancer and cryoimmunological responses. Skin Cancer 1995;10:19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tanaka S. Cryosurgical treatment of advanced breast cancer. Skin Cancer 1995;10:9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kaufman CS, Bachman B, Littrup PJ, et al. Office-based ultrasound-guided cryoablation of breast fibroadenomas. Am J Surg 2002;184:394–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rabin Y, Julian TB, Olson P, et al. Long-term follow-up post-cryosurgery in a sheep breast model. Cryobiology 1999;39:29–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rui J, Tatsutani KN, Dahiya R, Rubinsky B. Effect of thermal variables on human breast cancer in cryosurgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;53:185–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rand RW, Rand RP, Eggerding FA, et al. Cryolumpectomy for breast cancer: an experimental study. Cryobiology 1985;22:307–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Neel HB, Ketcham AS, Hammond WG. Requisites for successful cryogenic surgery of cancer. Arch Surg 1971;102:45–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gage AA. History of cryosurgery. Semin Surg Oncol 1998;14:99–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bird HM. James Arnott, MD (Aberdeen, 1797–1883): a pioneer in refrigeration analgesia. Anesthesia 1949;4:10–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Arnott J. Practical illustrations of the remedial efficacy of a very low or anesthetic temperature. Lancet 1850;2:257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rand RW, Rand RP, Eggerding F, et al. Cryolumpectomy for carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;165:392–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Simmons R, Dowlatshahi K, Singletary SE, Staren ED. Image-guided ablation of breast tumors. Contemp Surg 2002;58:61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Deleted in proof.

  49. Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Oberman HA, Adler DD. Invasive lobular carcinoma: imaging features and clinical detection. Invest Radiol 1993;28:202–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Krecke KN, Gisvold JJ. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 183 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;61:957–60.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 2002;89:1296–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chopra S, Evans AJ, Pinder SE, et al. Pure mucinous breast cancer—mammographic and ultrasound findings. Clin Radiol 1996;51:421–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wilson TE, Helvie MA, Oberman HA, et al. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: pathological basis for differences in mammographic appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:285–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Stomper PC, Connolly JL. Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:269–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Satake H, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1726–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Verbeek A, et al. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histologic correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990;335:519–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tresserra F, Feu J, Grases PJ, et al. Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation. J Clin Ultrasound 1999;27:485–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Deleted in proof.

  60. Cady B. Breast cancer in the third millennium. Breast J 2000;6:280–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Shepherd JP, Dawber RPR. Wound healing and scarring after cryosurgery. Cryobiology 1984;21:157–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Deleted in proof.

  63. Johnson JP. Immunologic aspects of cryosurgery: potential modulation of immune recognition and effector cell maturation. Clin Dermatol 1990;8:39–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Gage AA. Cryosurgery for oral and pharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1969;118:669–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Soanes WA, Ablin RJ, Gonder MJ. Remission of metastatic lesions following cryosurgery in prostatic cancer. J Urol 1970;104:154–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ablin RJ. An appreciation and realization of the concept of cryoimmunology. Ablin RJ, eds. Percutaneous Prostate Cryoablation. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing Inc, 1995: 136–54.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bayjoo P, Rees RC, Goepel JR, Jacob G. Natural killer cell activity following cryosurgery of normal and tumour bearing liver in an animal model. J Clin Lab Immunol 1991;35:129–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Bilchik AJ, Sarantou T, Wardlaw JC, Ramming KP. Cryosurgery causes a profound reduction in tumor markers in hepatoma and noncolorectal hepatic metastases. Am Surg 1997;63:796–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Faraci RP, Bagley DH, Marrone JC, Beazley RM. The effect of curative cryosurgery on the tumor-specific immune response of C57 mice. Cryobiology 1975;12:175–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Fazio M, Airoldi M, Gandolfo S, et al. Humoral and cellular immune response to cryosurgery of benign and malignant lesions of the oral cavity (in Italian). Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 1982;58:412–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Faraci RP, Bagley DH, Marrone JC, Beazley RM. In vitro determination of cryosurgical augmentation of tumor immunity. Surgery 1975;77:433–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Hoffmann NE, Coad JE, Huot CS, et al. Investigation of the mechanism and the effect of cryoimmunology in the Copenhagen rat. Cryobiology 2001;41:59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kogel H, Grundmann R, Fohlmeister I, Pichlmaier H. Cryotherapy of rectal cancer. Immunologic results (in German). Zentralbl Chir 1985;110:147–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Misao A, Sakata K, Saji S, Kuneida T. Late appearance of resistance to tumor rechallenge following cryosurgery: a study in an experimental mammary tumor of the rat. Cryobiology 1981;18:386–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Tsujino M. Activation and regulation of macrophages induced by inoculation of cryodestroyed tumor cells (in Japanese). Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi 1990;35:180–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Wang Z. Cryosurgery in rectal carcinoma—report of 41 cases (in Chinese). Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 1989;11:226–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Ravindranath MH, Wood TF, Soh D, et al. Cryosurgical ablation of liver tumors in colon cancer patients increases the serum total ganglioside level and then selectively augments antiganglioside IgM. Cryobiology 2002;45:10–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Sabel MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabel, M.S., Kaufman, C.S., Whitworth, P. et al. Cryoablation of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Work-in-Progress Report of a Multi-Institutional Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 11, 542–549 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.08.003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.08.003

Key Words