Skip to main content
Download PDF

Activation of conventional protein kinase C (PKC) is critical in the generation of human neutrophil extracellular traps

Journal of Inflammation volumeĀ 10, ArticleĀ number:Ā 12 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Activation of NADPH oxidase is required for neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Protein kinase C (PKC) is an upstream mediator of NADPH oxidase activation and thus likely to have a role in NET formation.

Methods

Pharmacological inhibitors were used to block PKC activity in neutrophils harvested from healthy donor blood.

Results

Pan PKC inhibition with Ro-31-8220 (p<0.001), conventional PKC inhibition with Go 6976 (p<0.001) and specific PKCĪ² inhibition with LY333531 (p<0.01) blocked NET formation in response to PMA. Inhibition of novel and atypical PKC had no effect. LY333531 blocked NET induction by the diacylglycerol analogue OAG (conventional PKC activator) (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Conventional PKCs have a prominent role in NET formation. Furthermore PKCĪ² is the major isoform implicated in NET formation.

Introduction

Neutrophil granulocytes are key cells of the innate immune system with a primary function of killing invading microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and parasites to prevent pathogenic spread and invasion[1, 2]. Once identified, neutrophils phagocytose and destroy microbes inside the phagolysosome by localised disgorgement of granule contents and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)[3]. Engulfment of the microorganism allows killing to take place in a confined area within the cell and not in the extracellular space. Neutrophils may also liberate granule contents and ROS into the surrounding extracellular space to destroy nearby foreign pathogens. Dysregulation of these processes may cause histotoxic damage surrounding host cells. More recently a further extracellular killing mechanism available to neutrophils has been described known as neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation[3, 4]. NETs are formed by the mixing of cytoplasmic contents with nuclear histones and DNA to form a network which is propelled to the exterior of the cell. Microbes are caught in this mesh and killed by the neutrophil proteins and histones contained in the NETs. This process of NET formation leads to a form of cell death, NETosis, that has been characterised as being different from either apoptosis or necrosis[5].

NET formation is known to be stimulated by specific cytokines (e.g., interleukin 8 (IL-8)), bacterial products (e.g., lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) and importantly by clinically relevant pathogens such as Shigella flexneri, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella thyphimurium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and the fungus Candida albicans[6]. Stimulation and activation of neutrophils with the diacylglycerol (DAG) mimetic phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) also results in the production of NETs and has given important clues as to the possible mechanism involved in the formation of such structures. It is clear that NET formation following PMA stimulation is dependent on ROS production (via the NADPH oxidase system) and this is likely to follow the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) as well as other pathways such as raf-MEK-ERK[7].

The PKC isozyme family is comprised of conventional, novel and atypical isoforms[8]. There are at least four conventional isozymes: PKCĪ±, PKCĪ²I, PKCĪ²II and PKCĪ³. The novel isozyme group has four subtypes: PKCĪ“, PKCĪµ, PKCĪ· and PKCĪø. The third group, atypical isozymes, consists of PKCĪ¶ and PKCĪ¹[9]. PMA stimulates conventional (Ī±, Ī²I, Ī²II, Ī³) and novel (Ī“, Īµ, Ī·, Īø) PKC by mimicking the activating ligand DAG[8]. PKC isoforms of all classifications have been reported in neutrophils from healthy donors[10]. Given that PMA activation triggers NET formation, we hypothesised that specific isoform(s) of PKC are a key modulator of the NET formation pathway. To address this hypothesis we evaluated a panel of PKC inhibitors on NET formation.

Material and methods

Reagents

Dihydrorhodamine (DHR), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), diphenyliodonium (DPI), Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), Ro-31-8220, PKCĪ¶ pseudosubstrate myristoyl trifluoroacetate (PKCĪ¶ inhibitor) and SYTOX green were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK); Rottlerin, Gƶ 6976 and LY333531 were from Calbiochem (Merck) (Darmstadt, Germany).

Isolation of human neutrophils

Peripheral blood neutrophils were isolated from healthy human volunteers according to Lothian Research Ethics Committee approvals #08/S1103/38 via dextran sedimentation and Percollā„¢ discontinuous gradients as described[11, 12]. Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects. Purity of the neutrophils was assessed by examination of cytocentrifuge preparations and was greater than 95%.

Assessment of NET formation

Neutrophils (5Ɨ104 cells/well) in HBSS containing Ca2+, Mg2+ and Hepes (20Ā mM) were aliquoted (180Ā Ī¼l) into 96 well plates and left to settle for 30Ā min at 37Ā°C. The inhibitors Ro-31-8220, DPI, rottlerin, PKCĪ¶ inhibitor, Gƶ 6976 and PKCĪ² inhibitor were added at appropriate concentrations to wells in duplicates and incubated for 30Ā min before adding PMA. The final volume in each well was 200Ā Ī¼l. Plates were incubated for 4Ā h and then SYTOX green (6Ā Ī¼M final concentration), a cell-impermeable nucleic acid stain, with an excitation/emission maxima of 504/523Ā nm to give a green fluorescent light, was added and NET formation was observed by measuring mean fluorescence in 96 well plates. In some experiments 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) was used to stimulate cells in place of PMA. Results were evaluated by measuring the mean fluorescence in 96 well plates after the subtraction of background fluorescence. Cells were also visualised by fluorescent microscopy carried out on a Zeiss Axiovert S100 fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and an Evos fl inverted microscope (AMG, Bothwell, WA).

Statistical analysis

Data were assessed by one way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Dunnettā€™s test. The data were expressed as mean Ā± standard error of the mean (SEM), and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad, CA, USA).

Results

PMA induced NET formation

Incubation of human neutrophils with PMA induced dramatic changes in morphology at 4Ā h after stimulation, resulting in NETs that stained positive with SYTOX green which is impermeable to cells with an intact membrane. The abundance of NETs was almost maximal at 10Ā nM PMA above which the magnitude of NET formation plateaued (FigureĀ 1A-N). Cells stimulated with PMA demonstrated typical morphology of diffuse and spread NETs (FigureĀ 1M). Measuring the level of total fluorescence with SYTOX green allowed the assessment of total extracellular DNA and thus NET formation (FigureĀ 1N). NET formation determined by microscopy and cell counting (i.e., by expressing the number of areas of extracellular DNA as a percentage of total cell count[14]) strongly correlated with the measurement of NET abundance based on total fluorescence (r2=0.98), data not shown. Therefore total fluorescence was utilised as a reliable screening assay in further experiments to allow a range of inhibitors to be compared, before confirmation with gold-standard microscopic validation. This test was reproducible with an average inter-assay coefficient of variation of 14.3%. As almost maximal NET formation was gained with 10Ā nM PMA (FigureĀ 1B), this concentration was selected for all further experiments.

Figure 1
figure 1

PMA induced NET formation: A-M) Cells were treated for 4Ā h with PMA (A,B: control, C,D: 0.1Ā nM, E,F 1Ā nM, G,H 10Ā nM, I,J 100Ā nM, K,L 1Ā Ī¼M,) and microscopy performed at a density of 50,000 cells per well in a 96 well plate. Sytox Green cell impermeable dye was added at a concentration of 6Ā Ī¼M. Cells with a typical morphology of diffuse and spread NETs were noted [in this figure 50,000 cells were plated in 1Ā ml of media in plastic 24 well plates and stimulated as above with 100Ā nM PMA] (M). Scale bars = 10 microns. A greater abundance of NETs was seen with increases in PMA concentration but abundance was similar in the 10ā€“1000Ā nM range. N) Fluorescence of extracellular DNA by cell impermeable Sytox Green was measured with an excitation of 485Ā nm and measured at 530Ā nm. Background fluorescence was subtracted and the abundance of NETS expressed as fluorescence in arbitrary units. The concentration-dependent response of NET formation plateaued after 10Ā nM PMA. Data show mean +/āˆ’ SEM for n = 6 independent experiments.

Full size image

NET formation is PKC and NADPH oxidase dependent

In order to determine whether NET formation was dependent on the activation of PKC and NADPH oxidase, cells were preincubated with increasing concentrations of the specific but isozyme non-selective PKC inhibitor, Ro-31-8220 or the NADPH inhibitor diphenyloidonium (DPI) for 30Ā min and then treated with 10Ā nM PMA. Both Ro-31-8220 and DPI, completely inhibited PMA induced NET formation (FigureĀ 2A and2B) measured by SYTOX green fluorescence and confirmed by microscopy. These data confirm the key role of NADPH oxidase and demonstrate that the NET-forming activity of PMA is critically dependent upon PKC pathways upstream of NADPH oxidase.

Figure 2
figure 2

Effect of DPI and Ro-31-8220 on NET formation: Cells were plated as described and either pre-treated with DPI or Ro-31-8220 at increasing concentrations, or control media, before stimulating with PMA at 10Ā nM for 4Ā h. NET abundance was measured by total fluorescence from Sytox Green cell impermeable dye. A) Pre-treatment with Ro-31-8220 completely abrogated NET formation at 100Ā nM and 1Ā Ī¼M. Data show mean +/āˆ’ SEM for n=4 independent experiments. *** indicates p<0.001. B) Pre-treatment with DPI significantly decreased NET formation at 10Ā nM, and completely abrogated NET formation at 100Ā nM and 1Ā Ī¼M. Data show mean +/āˆ’ SEM for n=4 independent experiments. *** indicates p<0.001.

Full size image

Specific PKC isoforms regulated NET formation

Ro-31-8220 is an inhibitor of multiple PKC isoforms, therefore in order to investigate PKC isoform specificity, PKC isoform classes were targeted with specific inhibitors; Gƶ 6976 (Conventional), rottlerin (Novel), PKCĪ¶ psuedosubstrate (Atypical) (FigureĀ 3A, B, C). FigureĀ 3A demonstrates that Gƶ 6976 significantly inhibited NET formation at 100Ā nM (p<0.05) and 1Ā Ī¼M (p<0.001). In contrast, Rottlerin and PKCĪ¶ psuedosubstrate had no significant effect on NET formation (FigureĀ 3B and C). These data were confirmed microscopically and demonstrate a key role for conventional PKC in NET formation.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of isozyme specific PKC inhibitors on NET formation: Cells were plated as described and either pre-treated with at increasing concentrations of Gƶ 6976 (conventional PKC inhibitor), Rottlerin (atypical PKC inhibitor), PKCĪ¶ psuedosubstrate (novel PKC inhibitor), or control media, before stimulation with PMA at 10Ā nM for 4Ā h. A) Pre-treatment with Gƶ 6976 significantly reduced NET formation at 100Ā nM (P<0.05) and 1Ā Ī¼M (p<0.001). B) Pre-treatment with Rottlerin had no effect on NET formation. C) Pre-treatment with PKCĪ¶ psuedosubstrate had no effect on NET formation. Data show mean +/āˆ’ SEM for n=3 independent experiments. * indicates p<0.05, *** indicates p<0.001.

Full size image

PKC Ī² is Primarily Implicated in NET formation in Response to PMA and OAG

Gƶ 6976 is an inhibitor of both PKCĪ± and Ī², thus, in order to separate the roles of these two isozymes, a specific PKCĪ² inhibitor (LY333531) was employed (FigureĀ 4). LY333531 significantly inhibited NET formation by PMA at a concentration of 100Ā nM (p<0.05) and 1Ā Ī¼M (p<0.01) (FigureĀ 4A). In addition, 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG; a DAG analogue and activator of conventional PKC isoforms) stimulated NET formation in a manner similar to that of PMA (albeit at higher concentrations) and was also significantly inhibited by 1Ā Ī¼M LY333531 (p<0.01) (FigureĀ 4B). These data were confirmed by microscopy and delineate a central role for PKC Ī² in PMA and OAG-induced NET formation (FigureĀ 4C-J). Interestingly as well as knocking down total NET production LY333531 completely abrogated the presence of ā€œspreading NETsā€ at the 100Ā nm concentration but some diffuse NET formation was still observed (FigureĀ 4K,L).

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of PKC Ī² on NET formation in response to PMA and DAG analogue OAG: Cells were plated as described and pre-treated with increasing concentrations of LY333531 (PKCĪ² inhibitor) before treatment with either 10Ā nM PMA or 20Ā Ī¼M 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) for 4Ā h. A) Pre-Treatment with increasing concentrations of LY333531 decreases NET formation in response to 10 nM PMA. Data show mean +/āˆ’ SEM for n=6 independent experiments for PMA stimulated cells and n=3 for OAG stimulated cells. *indicates p<0.05, ***p<0.001. B). Pre-treatment with increasing concentrations of LY333531 completely abrogated NET formation in response to 20Ā Ī¼M OAG. Data show mean +/āˆ’ SEM for n=3 independent experiments. *** indicates p<0.001. C-J). Pre-treatment with 1Ā Ī¼M LY333531 completely abrogated NET formation in response to PMA and OAG, images representative of n=3 independent experiments (C,D Cells treated with 10Ā nM PMA. E,F cells pre-treated with 1Ā Ī¼M LY333531 for 30Ā min then 10Ā nM PMA. G,H cells treated with 20Ā Ī¼M OAG. I,G Cells pre-treated with 1Ā Ī¼M LY333531 for 30Ā min then 20Ā Ī¼M OAG. K,L Higher magnification images of effects of treatment with 100Ā nM LY333531 (L) prior to 10Ā nM PMA. Fluorescent and phase images combined. There is an absence of spreading NET material in the LY333531 treated cells although some diffuse NET formation is still present at this concentration of inhibitor. Scale bars = 10 microns.

Full size image

PKCĪ² inhibition has downstream effects on oxidative burst

To elucidate the downstream effects of PKCĪ² inhibition we assessed the effects of LY333531 on oxidative burst as measured by DHR fluorescence on flow cytometry. LY333531 reduced NADPH oxidative burst at the same concentrations required to reduce NET formation, with a partial but significant knock down of activity at 100Ā nM (p<0.01) and a complete knockdown at 1Ā Ī¼M (p<0.001) in comparison to the positive controls of DPI and Ro-31-8220 (FigureĀ 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

The downstream effect of PKC Ī² inhibition on oxidative burst. Cells were pretreated with LY333531 (Ly) at increasing concentrations and NADPH oxidase activity measured by DHR fluorescence on flow-cytometry. DPI and Ro-31-8220 (Ro) were used as positive controls. LY333531 reduced NADPH oxidase activity at both 100Ā nM (p<0.01) and 1Ā Ī¼M (p<0.001) consistent with the concentrations of inhibitor required to reduce NET formation. # indicates p<0.05, ## indicates p<0.01, and ### indicates p<0.001 vs. untreated control. ** indicates p<0.01 and *** indicates p<0.001 vs. PMA treated cells.

Full size image

Assessment of downstream effects of PKCĪ² inhibition with specific inhibitors

ROS generation was assessed by dihydrorhodamine (DHR) fluorescence as described previously[13]. Neutrophils were resuspended in HBSS with cations and loaded with DHR (2Ā M; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 10Ā min. Cells were then incubated with or without PKCĪ² inhibitor (at 10, 100 and 1000Ā nM) or the positive controls Ro-31-8220 or DPI at 1Ī¼M on a shaking heat block for 30Ā min before stimulation with PMA 10Ā nM for a further 15Ā min. DHR fluorescence was analyzed by flow cytometry (FL-1).

Discussion

The results clearly show that NET formation induced by PMA is PKC and NADPH oxidase dependent. NET formation was blocked by both Pan-PKC inhibition and conventional-PKC inhibition. Furthermore, a specific PKCĪ² inhibitor (LY333531) also blocked NET formation. LY333531 has high selectivity for PKCĪ² over other conventional isoforms (IC50 of around 5Ā nM) with a 60 fold selectivity for PKCĪ² over PKCĪ±[15]. At higher concentrations specific inhibitors may have non-selective effects on other PKC isoforms. The IC50 of LY333531 for PKCĪ± is around 300Ā nM, suggesting that the majority of the effect of this compound at the concentrations utilised in our study is via the inhibition of PKCĪ² and not PKCĪ±; this is evidenced by the significant reduction in NET formation with 100Ā nM LY333531. The intracellular concentration of LY333531 within the neutrophil following incubation is unknown but it is unlikely to be fully absorbed and as such again we would suggest the effects are due to inhibition of PKCĪ². Previous work has demonstrated that PKCĪ² accounts for 50% of the neutrophil response to PMA further underlining the likely predominant role of PKCĪ² in NET production[16].

Oxidative burst and the generation of reactive oxygen species including superoxide anions (02-) and nitric oxide (NO) are fundamental responses of the neutrophil to inflammatory stimuli and pathogens. NET formation is dependent on NADPH oxidase activation and consequently on the generation of 02- which can be blocked by DPI. DPI inhibits NADPH oxidase by binding to specific subunits in the enzyme complex and preventing electron flow and 02- production[17]. The main component of NADPH oxidase is the flavocytochrome b558, a dimer of p22phox and gp91phox, which is an active transporter of electrons across the membrane. Coupled to these are proteins p40phox, p47phox, p67phox and p21rac which are crucial to electron translocation[18]. These proteins assemble when activated to produce 02- which are then spontaneously converted to H2O2. Interestingly, p47phox has to be phosphorylated to acquire a conformational rearrangement to expose the domains that are important for the NADPH oxidase function, and this phosphorylation is mediated by PKC[19]. This is consistent with our findings that PKC is involved in PMA induced NET formation and furthermore that PKCĪ² is the isoform crucially involved. This is further underlined by the finding that oxidative burst is reduced by concentrations of LY333531 that reduce NET formation.

The beneficial anti-microbial effects of NET formation have been described in several studies[4, 20ā€“25]. Indeed, this is perhaps most pertinently displayed in restoration of NADPH oxidase function in chronic granulomatous disease by gene therapy leading to an increased resistance to fungal infection and clinical improvement secondary to the restoration of the ability to form NETs[22]. Several studies however have demonstrated a pro-inflammatory potential of NETs in a diverse range of diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus[26ā€“28], cystic fibrosis[1, 29, 30] and psoriasis[31]. Therefore the modulation of NET production may be a viable anti-inflammatory target. Inhibition of PKC activity represents one such target as PKC inhibitors have been in development for many years as potential anti-cancer therapies, many of which are orally bioavailable[9]. Furthermore the relative redundancy in PKC function due to multiple isoforms may allow the targeting of specific PKCs in specific cell types at specific organ sites. PKCĪ² knock out in a murine model has been demonstrated to modulate ischemia reperfusion injury in vivo[32], however these mice may also be immunodeficient[33] and thus caution must be exercised in any strategy to specifically target PKC. Extracellular traps from both neutrophils and mast cells have been demonstrated in psoriatic skin lesions and from purified neutrophils from psoriasis patients in association with IL-17 and MPO, directly implicating extracellular traps in the pathogenesis of disease[31]. A previous study of a PKC inhibitor AEB071 with specificity for PKC Ī±, Ī², and Īø in psoriasis demonstrated not only in-vitro effects on T cell proliferation and cytokine production but also a clinical improvement in psoriatic lesions in treated patients[34]. We may infer that some of this effect may be due to a direct effect of PKC inhibition on NET formation and thus inflammation in the skin lesions of these patients. Further studies will of course be required to support this hypothesis.

In summary, NET formation in response to PMA and DAG analogues is dependent on PKC activation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that conventional PKC and in particular PKCĪ² is the predominant isoform responsible for NET formation under these conditions. Although NETs have been demonstrated to entrap and kill various microorganisms there is burgeoning evidence implicating a role for these structures in inflammatory disease and potential modulation of NET production (by PKC inhibition) may offer a novel anti-inflammatory strategy.

Funding

RDG is a Wellcome Trust Fellow (093767). DD is an MRC Senior Research Fellow (G1002046). This work was also funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT094415; CL) and the MRC (G0601481; AGR and CH).

References

  1. Papayannopoulos V, Staab D, Zychlinsky A: Neutrophil elastase enhances sputum solubilization in cystic fibrosis patients receiving DNase therapy. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e28526-10.1371/journal.pone.0028526.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Nathan C: Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006, 6: 173-182. 10.1038/nri1785.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A: Beneficial suicide: why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007, 5: 577-582. 10.1038/nrmicro1710.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, Weinrauch Y, Zychlinsky A: Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004, 303: 1532-1535. 10.1126/science.1092385.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V, Weinrauch Y, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A: Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol. 2007, 176: 231-241. 10.1083/jcb.200606027.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Medina E: Neutrophil extracellular traps: a strategic tactic to defeat pathogens with potential consequences for the host. J Innate Immun. 2009, 1: 176-180. 10.1159/000203699.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Hakkim A, Fuchs TA, Martinez NE, Hess S, Prinz H, Zychlinsky A, Waldmann H: Activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Nat Chem Biol. 2011, 7: 75-77.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Way KJ, Chou E, King GL: Identification of PKC-isoform-specific biological actions using pharmacological approaches. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000, 21: 181-187. 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01468-1.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Roffey J, Rosse C, Linch M, Hibbert A, McDonald NQ, Parker PJ: Protein kinase C intervention: the state of play. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009, 21: 268-279. 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.019.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Balasubramanian N, Advani SH, Zingde SM: Protein kinase C isoforms in normal and leukemic neutrophils: altered levels in leukemic neutrophils and changes during myeloid maturation in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2002, 26: 67-81. 10.1016/S0145-2126(01)00098-4.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Haslett C, Guthrie LA, Kopaniak MM, Johnston RB, Henson PM: Modulation of multiple neutrophil functions by preparative methods or trace concentrations of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Am J Pathol. 1985, 119: 101-110.

    PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Rossi AG, Sawatzky DA, Walker A, Ward C, Sheldrake TA, Riley NA, Caldicott A, Martinez-Losa M, Walker TR, Duffin R: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors enhance the resolution of inflammation by promoting inflammatory cell apoptosis. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 1056-1064. 10.1038/nm1468.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Lucas CD, Allen KC, Dorward DA, Hoodless LJ, Melrose LA, Marwick JA, Tucker CS, Haslett C, Duffin R, Rossi AG: Flavones induce neutrophil apoptosis by down-regulation of Mcl-1 via a proteasomal-dependent pathway. FASEB J. 2013, 27 (3): 1084-1094. 10.1096/fj.12-218990.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Metzler KD, Fuchs TA, Nauseef WM, Reumaux D, Roesler J, Schulze I, Wahn V, Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A: Myeloperoxidase is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation: implications for innate immunity. Blood. 2010, 117: 953-959.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Jirousek MR, Gillig JR, Gonzalez CM, Heath WF, McDonald JH, Neel DA, Rito CJ, Singh U, Stramm LE, Melikian-Badalian A: (S)-13-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-10,11,14,15-tetrahydro-4,9:16, 21-dimetheno-1H, 13H-dibenzo[e, k]pyrrolo[3,4-h][1,4,13]oxadiazacyclohexadecene-1,3(2H)-d ione (LY333531) and related analogues: isozyme selective inhibitors of protein kinase C beta. J Med Chem. 1996, 39: 2664-2671. 10.1021/jm950588y.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Dekker LV, Leitges M, Altschuler G, Mistry N, McDermott A, Roes J, Segal AW: Protein kinase C-beta contributes to NADPH oxidase activation in neutrophils. Biochem J. 2000, 347 (Pt 1): 285-289.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Doussiere J, Vignais PV: Diphenylene iodonium as an inhibitor of the NADPH oxidase complex of bovine neutrophils. Factors controlling the inhibitory potency of diphenylene iodonium in a cell-free system of oxidase activation. Eur J Biochem. 1992, 208: 61-71. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17159.x.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Segal AW: How neutrophils kill microbes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005, 23: 197-223. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115653.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Babior BM, Lambeth JD, Nauseef W: The neutrophil NADPH oxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002, 397: 342-344. 10.1006/abbi.2001.2642.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Yost CC, Cody MJ, Harris ES, Thornton NL, McInturff AM, Martinez ML, Chandler NB, Rodesch CK, Albertine KH, Petti CA: Impaired neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation: a novel innate immune deficiency of human neonates. Blood. 2009, 113: 6419-6427. 10.1182/blood-2008-07-171629.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Urban CF, Reichard U, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A: Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8: 668-676. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00659.x.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Bianchi M, Hakkim A, Brinkmann V, Siler U, Seger RA, Zychlinsky A, Reichenbach J: Restoration of NET formation by gene therapy in CGD controls aspergillosis. Blood. 2009, 114: 2619-2622. 10.1182/blood-2009-05-221606.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Ermert D, Urban CF, Laube B, Goosmann C, Zychlinsky A, Brinkmann V: Mouse neutrophil extracellular traps in microbial infections. J Innate Immun. 2009, 1: 181-193. 10.1159/000205281.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A: NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons. Trends Immunol. 2009, 30: 513-521. 10.1016/j.it.2009.07.011.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Urban CF, Ermert D, Schmid M, Abu-Abed U, Goosmann C, Nacken W, Brinkmann V, Jungblut PR, Zychlinsky A: Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000639-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000639.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Lande R, Ganguly D, Facchinetti V, Frasca L, Conrad C, Gregorio J, Meller S, Chamilos G, Sebasigari R, Riccieri V: Neutrophils activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells by releasing self-DNA-peptide complexes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Transl Med. 2011, 3: 73ra19-10.1126/scitranslmed.3001180.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Leffler J, Martin M, Gullstrand B, Tyden H, Lood C, Truedsson L, Bengtsson AA, Blom AM: Neutrophil extracellular traps that are not degraded in systemic lupus erythematosus activate complement exacerbating the disease. J Immunol. 2012, 188 (7): 3522-3531. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102404.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Garcia-Romo GS, Caielli S, Vega B, Connolly J, Allantaz F, Xu Z, Punaro M, Baisch J, Guiducci C, Coffman RL: Netting neutrophils are major inducers of type I IFN production in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Transl Med. 2011, 3: 73ra20-10.1126/scitranslmed.3001201.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Manzenreiter R, Kienberger F, Marcos V, Schilcher K, Krautgartner WD, Obermayer A, Huml M, Stoiber W, Hector A, Griese M: Ultrastructural characterization of cystic fibrosis sputum using atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. J Cyst Fibros. 2012, 11 (2): 84-92. 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.09.008.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Marcos V, Zhou Z, Yildirim AO, Bohla A, Hector A, Vitkov L, Wiedenbauer EM, Krautgartner WD, Stoiber W, Belohradsky BH: CXCR2 mediates NADPH oxidase-independent neutrophil extracellular trap formation in cystic fibrosis airway inflammation. Nat Med. 2010, 16: 1018-1023. 10.1038/nm.2209.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Lin AM, Rubin CJ, Khandpur R, Wang JY, Riblett M, Yalavarthi S, Villanueva EC, Shah P, Kaplan MJ, Bruce AT: Mast cells and neutrophils release IL-17 through extracellular trap formation in psoriasis. J Immunol. 2011, 187: 490-500. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100123.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Kong L, Andrassy M, Chang JS, Huang C, Asai T, Szabolcs MJ, Homma S, Liu R, Zou YS, Leitges M: PKCbeta modulates ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008, 294: H1862-H1870. 10.1152/ajpheart.01346.2007.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Leitges M, Schmedt C, Guinamard R, Davoust J, Schaal S, Stabel S, Tarakhovsky A: Immunodeficiency in protein kinase cbeta-deficient mice. Science. 1996, 273: 788-791. 10.1126/science.273.5276.788.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Skvara H, Dawid M, Kleyn E, Wolff B, Meingassner JG, Knight H, Dumortier T, Kopp T, Fallahi N, Stary G: The PKC inhibitor AEB071 may be a therapeutic option for psoriasis. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 3151-3159. 10.1172/JCI35636.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh Medical School, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

      Robert D Gray,Ā Christopher D Lucas,Ā Annie MacKellar,Ā Feng Li,Ā Katia Hiersemenzel,Ā Chris Haslett,Ā Donald J DavidsonĀ &Ā Adriano G Rossi

    Authors
    1. Robert D Gray
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    2. Christopher D Lucas
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    3. Annie MacKellar
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    4. Feng Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    5. Katia Hiersemenzel
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    6. Chris Haslett
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    7. Donald J Davidson
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    8. Adriano G Rossi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Robert D Gray.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authorsā€™ contributions

    RDG, CDL, AM, FL and KM carried out the experiments. RDG, CH, DJD and AGR designed the experiments and provided a critical review of methods. RDG drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Donald J Davidson and Adriano G Rossi contributed equally to this work.

    Authorsā€™ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Gray, R.D., Lucas, C.D., MacKellar, A. et al. Activation of conventional protein kinase C (PKC) is critical in the generation of human neutrophil extracellular traps. J Inflamm 10, 12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-10-12

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-10-12

    Keywords

    Journal of Inflammation

    ISSN: 1476-9255

    Contact us